Mirrorless vs regular cameras... Opinion
Bruce T wrote:
Hi. My Canon RP doesn’t have IBIS? My Canon RP is a mirrorless. I was shooting a car show on Sunday and with the sun out, I had a hard time seeing the back screen. I had to use the viewfinder.
Doesn’t my Canon 5D4 have focus peaking, also? I just heard about focus peaking just a few days ago.
Stale material. Need new writers.
(
Download)
ken_stern wrote:
OMG --
The cost of all those mirrorless L-Primes not to mention what they are now charging for the L- zooms
Are there actually "L" lenses for Canon R series? Or just L equivalent.
I am NOT about to wade through 20+ more pages of replies to this philosophical question but thankj you anyway for burning a hole in another hour of my time.
EJMcD wrote:
Let's ask CHG_CANON if he finally realized that he needs a Nikon DSLR. We can get miles of giggles out of that.
But you can’t fault the man for his brand loyalty. Canon could come out with a state of the art mirrorless pin hole camera and he would gladly point out its virtues. Gotta admire a person with that much faith.
EJMcD wrote:
Another secret is VOLUME...if you take enough photos, some of them are going to be good.
That is true. The monkey at a keyboard will eventually type a Sonnet. ;)
ken_stern wrote:
You're right it's all about the sensors & I for one like seeing in real-time
Seeing in real time is good, but in quite a few cases I wouldn't see ANYTHING using a DSLR, while mirrorless shows me the image fine.
Such cases include:
High magnification macro
Low light
Infrared
If the sensor see's it, it shows in the EVF (boosted if required).
For motorsports I still mainly use my DSLRs as the viewfinder update makes more difference than the brightness.
However I don't think the title is right in calling DSLRs regular cameras, there are now far more cameras in use that don't have the mirror. DSLRs are becoming niche bodies :)
petrochemist wrote:
Seeing in real time is good, but in quite a few cases I wouldn't see ANYTHING using a DSLR, while mirrorless shows me the image fine.
Such cases include:
High magnification macro
Low light
Infrared
If the sensor see's it, it shows in the EVF (boosted if required).
For motorsports I still mainly use my DSLRs as the viewfinder update makes more difference than the brightness.
However I don't think the title is right in calling DSLRs regular cameras, there are now far more cameras in use that don't have the mirror. DSLRs are becoming niche bodies :)
Seeing in real time is good, but in quite a few ca... (
show quote)
You can see infrared? How’s that again?
This is a fun thread and lots of strong opinions here. I think I will keep using the cameras that I like and just have fun doing that.
JD750 wrote:
You can see infrared? How’s that again?
This is a fun thread and lots of strong opinions here. I think I will keep using the cameras that I like and just have fun doing that.
The answer is right there in the post.
Any image the sensor can form will be transmitted to the EVF and monitor (or monitor only, for SLRs).
Yes plenty of strong opinions. Strong on opinion, and feeble on logic, as per UHH Sacred Tradition !
Nevertheless, glad to see some stubborn loyalty to SLRs, cuz Ive still got several hanging around to get rid of ;-) I still use typical SLR lenses. My one complaint with modern SLRs is simply their viewfinders.
Latest features of post SLR cameras have proven very beneficial but I was toadally successful without them. The intolerable modern SLR viewfinders is what brought electronic viewfinders into my world. But acoarst I now use IBIS, preburst, etc etc. Evolution produced revolution.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.