Cany143 wrote:
Interesting that you might mention that (the composition in the first), Poppie. The 'composition' itself is more a result of a manner of processing I've been doing these past several months, and is something many might not agree with or like, but what others don't like or don't agree with does not greatly concern me. In effect, that first image is an amalgam of three separate shots taken from several paces apart from each other, then processed/merged together as a pano rather than a stacked and de-opasticized (as in the Pep Ventosa manner) series of blended images. I've posted a few such images in the past, but nobody's noticed the planned and intended visual repetitions that result. Which is okay by me.
Interesting that you might mention that (the compo... (
show quote)
well, you did a good job with the blend. I thought that the 2 trees looked an awful lot alike but other than that I didn't really have any idea