Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Sub-Gallery: Birds
Had to be quick
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 17, 2024 10:33:34   #
bajadreamer Loc: Baja California Sur
 
I have talked before about the "frame rate" of modern cameras; ie, the ability of the camera to take many pictures per second-in some cameras now up to 120 pictures per second. Usually this ability, "fps", is used to capture action, like birds flying. This image shows another advantage to a high fps rate. Deb took this picture of a Blonde-crested Woodpecker in SE Brazil this last summer. This species is often very wary and does not like people near. As a consequence, when this bird flew up and landed on a tree near Deb, she had to focus and shoot quickly. It was very dark-just after dawn, so her shutter speed was very slow. Ordinarily this would lead to blurry images, but she just held the shutter down and took about 25 images in just over one second. Only one of them was sharp and well focused; the others had "motion blur". Had she only shot one or two images the chances of a sharp one would have been low. Shot with a Canon R7, 100-500mm lens at 500 mm, SS 1/50, ISO 1000, f/7.1, EC of 0.3 (probably a mistake). Yes, she could have shot faster and raised her ISO, but this bird was on the side of tree only 2-3 seconds. Processed in PS, with about 50% crop.


(Download)

Reply
Mar 17, 2024 11:02:22   #
theaverlo Loc: Iowa
 
Beautiful bird! Great catch!

Reply
Mar 17, 2024 11:03:19   #
kpmac Loc: Ragley, La
 
Outstanding. I have often used the same technique to acquire a sharp image.

Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2024 11:27:47   #
Retired CPO Loc: Travel full time in an RV
 
Your wife deserves the prize of the year!!! Outstanding photo!!!
I use high frame rate too sometimes, but rarely. With flighty birds, often! And birds in flight.

Reply
Mar 17, 2024 11:29:26   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
bajadreamer wrote:
I have talked before about the "frame rate" of modern cameras; ie, the ability of the camera to take many pictures per second-in some cameras now up to 120 pictures per second. Usually this ability, "fps", is used to capture action, like birds flying. This image shows another advantage to a high fps rate. Deb took this picture of a Blonde-crested Woodpecker in SE Brazil this last summer. This species is often very wary and does not like people near. As a consequence, when this bird flew up and landed on a tree near Deb, she had to focus and shoot quickly. It was very dark-just after dawn, so her shutter speed was very slow. Ordinarily this would lead to blurry images, but she just held the shutter down and took about 25 images in just over one second. Only one of them was sharp and well focused; the others had "motion blur". Had she only shot one or two images the chances of a sharp one would have been low. Shot with a Canon R7, 100-500mm lens at 500 mm, SS 1/50, ISO 1000, f/7.1, EC of 0.3 (probably a mistake). Yes, she could have shot faster and raised her ISO, but this bird was on the side of tree only 2-3 seconds. Processed in PS, with about 50% crop.
I have talked before about the "frame rate&qu... (show quote)


Looks like a wild morph Pileated ! Thanks for the tip and sharing - GREAT catch !

Reply
Mar 17, 2024 11:42:17   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
Excellent result!

Reply
Mar 17, 2024 11:54:32   #
Manglesphoto Loc: 70 miles south of St.Louis
 
bajadreamer wrote:
I have talked before about the "frame rate" of modern cameras; ie, the ability of the camera to take many pictures per second-in some cameras now up to 120 pictures per second. Usually this ability, "fps", is used to capture action, like birds flying. This image shows another advantage to a high fps rate. Deb took this picture of a Blonde-crested Woodpecker in SE Brazil this last summer. This species is often very wary and does not like people near. As a consequence, when this bird flew up and landed on a tree near Deb, she had to focus and shoot quickly. It was very dark-just after dawn, so her shutter speed was very slow. Ordinarily this would lead to blurry images, but she just held the shutter down and took about 25 images in just over one second. Only one of them was sharp and well focused; the others had "motion blur". Had she only shot one or two images the chances of a sharp one would have been low. Shot with a Canon R7, 100-500mm lens at 500 mm, SS 1/50, ISO 1000, f/7.1, EC of 0.3 (probably a mistake). Yes, she could have shot faster and raised her ISO, but this bird was on the side of tree only 2-3 seconds. Processed in PS, with about 50% crop.
I have talked before about the "frame rate&qu... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2024 12:15:27   #
NMGal Loc: NE NM
 
Really nice capture.

Reply
Mar 17, 2024 14:20:05   #
Barn Owl
 
bajadreamer, Thanks for your post and the details on how the photos were taken. It was a good review for those times of low light. Sometimes it is not necessary to push the speed so high with the high level digital cameras. Plus, the key word was Quick.

Reply
Mar 17, 2024 16:18:25   #
cahale Loc: San Angelo, TX
 
First time I've seen a woodpecker that color. Thanks for the (excellent) post.

Reply
Mar 17, 2024 22:01:55   #
joecichjr Loc: Chicago S. Suburbs, Illinois, USA
 
bajadreamer wrote:
I have talked before about the "frame rate" of modern cameras; ie, the ability of the camera to take many pictures per second-in some cameras now up to 120 pictures per second. Usually this ability, "fps", is used to capture action, like birds flying. This image shows another advantage to a high fps rate. Deb took this picture of a Blonde-crested Woodpecker in SE Brazil this last summer. This species is often very wary and does not like people near. As a consequence, when this bird flew up and landed on a tree near Deb, she had to focus and shoot quickly. It was very dark-just after dawn, so her shutter speed was very slow. Ordinarily this would lead to blurry images, but she just held the shutter down and took about 25 images in just over one second. Only one of them was sharp and well focused; the others had "motion blur". Had she only shot one or two images the chances of a sharp one would have been low. Shot with a Canon R7, 100-500mm lens at 500 mm, SS 1/50, ISO 1000, f/7.1, EC of 0.3 (probably a mistake). Yes, she could have shot faster and raised her ISO, but this bird was on the side of tree only 2-3 seconds. Processed in PS, with about 50% crop.
I have talked before about the "frame rate&qu... (show quote)


Never, ever seen on of these - and you took a fantabulous shot

Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2024 23:29:49   #
Sinewsworn Loc: Port Orchard, WA
 
bajadreamer wrote:
I have talked before about the "frame rate" of modern cameras; ie, the ability of the camera to take many pictures per second-in some cameras now up to 120 pictures per second. Usually this ability, "fps", is used to capture action, like birds flying. This image shows another advantage to a high fps rate. Deb took this picture of a Blonde-crested Woodpecker in SE Brazil this last summer. This species is often very wary and does not like people near. As a consequence, when this bird flew up and landed on a tree near Deb, she had to focus and shoot quickly. It was very dark-just after dawn, so her shutter speed was very slow. Ordinarily this would lead to blurry images, but she just held the shutter down and took about 25 images in just over one second. Only one of them was sharp and well focused; the others had "motion blur". Had she only shot one or two images the chances of a sharp one would have been low. Shot with a Canon R7, 100-500mm lens at 500 mm, SS 1/50, ISO 1000, f/7.1, EC of 0.3 (probably a mistake). Yes, she could have shot faster and raised her ISO, but this bird was on the side of tree only 2-3 seconds. Processed in PS, with about 50% crop.
I have talked before about the "frame rate&qu... (show quote)


Great shot! Spray and pray. Used that in Vietnam. Used that technique but got tired of buying back-up drives.

Reply
Mar 17, 2024 23:30:36   #
CCPhotoist Loc: Cape Cod
 
Great shot! I love the rapid fire option.

Reply
Mar 18, 2024 07:11:41   #
raymondh Loc: Walker, MI
 
theaverlo wrote:
Beautiful bird! Great catch!


Yes and yes!

Reply
Mar 18, 2024 09:08:15   #
DougS Loc: Central Arkansas
 
Beautiful shot! Excellent photography!

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Sub-Gallery: Birds
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.