Racmanaz wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/feb/28/nato-expansion-war-russia-ukraine
Rac: your lack of knowledge, particularly history is clear in most of your writing and often totally absurd conclusions. Let me start first with the Cato Institute:
“Cato advocates for a limited governmental role in domestic and foreign affairs as well as strong protection of civil liberties. This includes support for lowering or abolishing most taxes, opposition to the Federal Reserve system and the Affordable Care Act, the privatization of numerous government agencies and programs including Social Security and the United States Postal Service, demilitarization of the police, open borders and adhering to a non-interventionist foreign policy.” From Wikipedia
I guess you didn’t know about getting rid of borders – be careful who you quote without knowing what they are all about.
The idea of isolationship was a tenant by Henry Cabot Lodge and the Republican party post World War I. Membership in the League of Nations was rejected and many feel that with US membership the rise of Hitler may have been stymied. How many lives, American and European, could have been saved with the UK and France’s pacification of Germany? What would the world be like today if we had kept moving west after the defeat of Germany which Patton suggested? He recognized the Soviet Union/Russia interests and appetite.
Perhaps the author and you have never spoken to people as I have that lived in Poland, the Baltics or other former Soviet states. They had relatives, friends and acquaintances that were set to gulags under the Russian boot. Do you think that they thought that NATO gave them the protection so they could live their lives?
BTW you recently parroted Trump about NATO; specifically, about their living up to the percent of GNP for defense. You might find it interesting that the majority of former Soviet states are matching that per cent. States such as Belgium, Netherlands and so on need to step up to the plate. But did you note that for Russia to get to these deadbeats they’d have to march through the states that were meeting their obligations?
You might want to check if Russia consider Ukraine part of Russia – Kiev was a major Russian city in previous centuries. The Ukrainians have a different view.
The lesson of history is simple, the costs to stop aggression increase the longer it is allowed to continue. IM O any move to change NATO opens the door for the Russians. As usual, like Trump, you didn’t do your homework.
Rant away in your usual manner. As noted above, your lack of research and ability to see the validity or non-validity of your sources is obvious.