Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Getting Old
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Mar 6, 2024 08:44:24   #
Canisdirus
 
When I met my future wife, she had contacts in.
About a month into dating she put on her glasses...woah!...binoculars...like really heavy glass.
You poor dear...you're blind! Let me help you across the street!
She was basically blind without them...hated her contacts...hated her glasses.

I suggested she smoke more weed...she just dabbled at parties and such.
We moved in together at some point...and I had access to unlimited supplies.
We both quit drinking for the most part and smoked weed instead.

It took about 5 or 6 years...but when she was at her eye doctors (whom she knew personally at this point)...
He was amazed at how much her eyesight improved...he could not figure out what was going on.

In the end...she was able to wear 'normal' glasses...that weighed half of what her old pairs did (think Harry Carey).

It helps.

Reply
Mar 6, 2024 09:09:33   #
BigDaddy Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
 
Dannj wrote:
A friend of mine wears glasses for distance but not for reading. She’s having cataracts removed and will now need the glasses for reading but not for distance.

I recently had cataract surgery and had a choice of getting my distance vision fixed which I've worn glasses for since I was 21, or leaving it and keeping my perfect close up vision. I figured since I don't read much, It would be great to be able to drive and watch TV w/o glasses. WOW, was I ever wrong. Yes, it's nice to watch TV and drive w/o glasses, but readers SUCK. I read constantly, looking at my Cell phone, watch, reading labels, medicine bottles, etc. etc. Things you never think of. Editing photo's on the computer was a breeze w/o readers. Now, I need two different scripts for sitting close or leaning back in my chair. WORST decision I've made in years. Before, IF I was wearing my glasses, and wanted to read small print, I just lifted up my glasses. ONE pair of glasses.

If I had it to do over, I'd tell the doc leave my eyes alone, just fix the cataracts (if possible). My distance glasses were no problem. I could wear them when driving not wear them most of the time. Now, I can't even walk with my readers on, I get dizzy. So I have glasses everywhere, multiple pairs. My distance vision was never all that bad but my reading vision was perfect. The other thing is I was my wife's magnifying glass. I could read anything. She could see great in distance if I needed it. Now neither of us can read anything w/o these damdable glasses. The good thing is I can drive at night. Cataracts were preventing night driving, and that's a major improvement.

Reply
Mar 6, 2024 09:46:40   #
RKastner Loc: Davenport, FL
 
Red6 wrote:


In my mid-40s I decided to have LASIK. I reasoned that my distant vision was so bad that if something happened to my thick heavy glasses, I would be almost helpless. I would not be able to drive or be able to do much of anything that required me to see beyond a few feet.


My vision had gotten so bad prior to LASIK that I used to joke that my next prescription was a dog.

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2024 10:17:56   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
terryMc wrote:
I had cataract surgery a couple of months ago, and it's not fully healed yet. I have worn glasses for 40 years.

I had my choice of implanting a lens that Medicare would pay for, which focuses near or far, but not both, (I've always been farsighted so I picked that one) or one that cost $3600 each and Medicare would not pay for. That one gives you normal vision and you don't need glasses at all. I also have astigmatism, and that is another added cost.

I took the farsighted Medicare-covered lens and now wear glasses only to read and work on the computer, but I can legally drive without them. I just got my Driver License renewed and passed the eye test with ease.

I was 80 before the cataracts got bad enough for surgery.
I had cataract surgery a couple of months ago, and... (show quote)


I had my cataracts replaced a couple years ago in my low 80s. Wore glasses since I was about 10. It was great getting rid of them for distance but since I was nearsighted, I now have to use readers so my glasses habits have been inverted. Fortunately the implanted lenses took care of astigmatism so I can wear the basic lenses (i.e. cheap) from the hardware store (Costco is probably cheapest, with occasional sales on a package of 3). I need them for computer work or reading.

I did get some graded bifocals. They help driving because the near vision allows me to read the dash instruments. Analog instruments are fine and the speed is in a large font but some of the other stuff is fine print (particularly on the GPS). I don't usually use them except for long trips.

Reply
Mar 6, 2024 10:20:16   #
Horseart Loc: Alabama
 
Scruples wrote:
Getting Old Ain’t For Sissies!

There are three stores in Brooklyn, NY. They offer prescription lenses. Nothing fancy or elaborate at about $100 per pair!!

Here’s how they do it. They buy frames from many stores that are last year’s designs. They are organized and your can pick from a whole bunch of frames. They keep in stock all sorts of lens magnifications. You can bring in a new prescription or the one you have now! I generally pay by credit card. In about a half hour, I have a new pair. Perfect!
I generally order three pairs, one for my everyday wear and a spare to have. I also order a pair for use as sunglasses.

There are some caveats here.
First they are located in Brooklyn. Second, they are closed on Saturday since it is run by Chasidic Jews.

I don’t mind since it is about a half-hour drive from my house.

I wish I had entrepreneurial spirit to build a store like this. I’m just a happy pharmacist slinging pills to pay the bills!
Getting Old Ain’t For Sissies! br br There are th... (show quote)


I have a question for you.
The Dr who did my hubby's and my cataract surgery told him to take Vitamin A (less than 10,000 units) every other day and vitamin E (no more than 540mg) every other day every day. Hubby had worn glasses since 2 years old and he did without glasses for a few years after the surgery. Then after he got glasses again his vision never worsened. That was 25 years ago and I still don't wear glasses.

You could tell us if that sounds good or if that is outdated after 25 years...???

Reply
Mar 6, 2024 10:30:14   #
W9OD Loc: Wisconsin
 
I am a retired optometrist. There is no way around needing glasses, at some point in a persons life. LASIK can take care of your distance vision, they can do a mono vision where one eye sees distance and one near. I really would not recommend that because your depth perception is greatly reduced and can cause you to be a hazard while driving. They also can do that with IOLs in the cataract surgery. When I was working, I had progressive lenses, when I retired, I got lined bifocals. The optics of progressive lenses are crap!! If you enjoy reading and do a lot of close work, the lines are far superior.

Reply
Mar 6, 2024 10:41:59   #
RKastner Loc: Davenport, FL
 
Horseart wrote:
I have a question for you.
The Dr who did my hubby's and my cataract surgery told him to take Vitamin A (less than 10,000 units) every other day and vitamin E (no more than 540mg) every other day every day. Hubby had worn glasses since 2 years old and he did without glasses for a few years after the surgery. That was 25 years ago and I still don't wear glasses.

Scruples could tell us if that sounds good or if that is outdated after 25 years.


I've never, ever been told that.

Therapeutically....Vitamin A is good for night vision. I'm puzzled about the use of Vitamin E. I've been told in all my life as a now retired Pharmacist that Vitamin E has no listed effectiveness for the eye and may be ineffective.

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2024 10:48:23   #
RKastner Loc: Davenport, FL
 
W9OD wrote:
I am a retired optometrist. There is no way around needing glasses, at some point in a persons life. LASIK can take care of your distance vision, they can do a mono vision where one eye sees distance and one near. I really would not recommend that because your depth perception is greatly reduced and can cause you to be a hazard while driving. They also can do that with IOLs in the cataract surgery. When I was working, I had progressive lenses, when I retired, I got lined bifocals. The optics of progressive lenses are crap!! If you enjoy reading and do a lot of close work, the lines are far superior.
I am a retired optometrist. There is no way around... (show quote)


I had mono-vision done when I had LASIK done and had no depth perception issues. When I had the cataracts taken care of they took that away, so I needed mild reading glasses. Thank you for your feedback.

I guess I should be grateful that I had nearly 18 years of not needing glasses. I understood that I was just buying time and eventually age would make me need glasses. I was still disappointed. I've accepted it now....not happy but I've accepted it.

Reply
Mar 6, 2024 10:57:12   #
sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri
 
Eyeglass frames are one of the biggest rip-offs in the world. What the heck justifies a $200 pair of eyeglass frames when you can buy a nice pair of sunglasses or readers for under $50? Well, if you want to know, here's a segment of the "60-Minutes" expose on the eyeglass rip-off. It's an eyeopener https://youtu.be/voUiWOGv8ec?si=3C_ed_IRSGchjh5O

Reply
Mar 6, 2024 11:00:49   #
terryMc Loc: Arizona's White Mountains
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
I had my cataracts replaced a couple years ago in my low 80s. Wore glasses since I was about 10. It was great getting rid of them for distance but since I was nearsighted, I now have to use readers so my glasses habits have been inverted. Fortunately the implanted lenses took care of astigmatism so I can wear the basic lenses (i.e. cheap) from the hardware store (Costco is probably cheapest, with occasional sales on a package of 3). I need them for computer work or reading.

I did get some graded bifocals. They help driving because the near vision allows me to read the dash instruments. Analog instruments are fine and the speed is in a large font but some of the other stuff is fine print (particularly on the GPS). I don't usually use them except for long trips.
I had my cataracts replaced a couple years ago in ... (show quote)


I decided to get just prescription reading/computer glasses, so I could drive without glasses. The nice lady who handled the purchase for me warned me that a lot of people don't like always removing and replacing glasses (like when you look at your phone, or have to read a price in the grocery store) but I thought I'd just get used to it. I may be rethinking that decision since I have found that I do it more often than I thought I would. The glasses I have are progressive anyway, as I sit further back from the computer than when reading a book. I have always had progressive lenses with the self-darkening feature, and now I need to put on sunglasses when I go out, so I am still wearing glasses all the time anyway. I may have to go back and get some all-the-time glasses again...I'll live with it for now.

Reply
Mar 6, 2024 11:09:55   #
RKastner Loc: Davenport, FL
 
sippyjug104 wrote:
Eyeglass frames are one of the biggest rip-offs in the world. What the heck justifies a $200 pair of eyeglass frames when you can buy a nice pair of sunglasses or readers for under $50? Well, if you want to know, here's a segment of the "60-Minutes" expose on the eyeglass rip-off. It's an eyeopener https://youtu.be/voUiWOGv8ec?si=3C_ed_IRSGchjh5O


The frames aren't the issue...the insurance covers $300 worth of frames...it's the lenses.

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2024 11:27:30   #
Shellback Loc: North of Cheyenne Bottoms Wetlands - Kansas
 
RKastner wrote:
I had mono-vision done when I had LASIK done and had no depth perception issues. When I had the cataracts taken care of they took that away, so I needed mild reading glasses. Thank you for your feedback.

I guess I should be grateful that I had nearly 18 years of not needing glasses. I understood that I was just buying time and eventually age would make me need glasses. I was still disappointed. I've accepted it now....not happy but I've accepted it.

I had contacts for astigmatism and 20/200 vision and still needed readers. I tried mono with the contacts but did not like it as I rode a motorcycle and if something blocked the far eye, everything was blurry and not good on a bike. I had LASIK done in 2000 (no mono) with excellent results - 20/15 with no astigmatism - loved it, but again, still needed readers. A couple of years ago I noticed my vision degrading and now I wear glasses again for minor adjustments for distance and astigmatism (bi-focal). I can still pass the driving test without glasses but I don’t think that is going to last as cataracts are forming. I also have minor macular degeneration so I take Lutein for eye health (recommended by my eye doctor). I’m just happy I don’t need my glasses for reading or computer work.

Reply
Mar 6, 2024 11:36:05   #
ncribble Loc: Albuquerque, NM
 
No comments on Glasses, which we all have and need them. But I'll share a true story of this morning.

When starting reading the UHG this morning I received a phone call from a Funeral Home wanting to stop by and discuss my future. My reply "No Thank You. I just got New Glasses so I'm good for at least the next 5 years".
Ole Norm

Reply
Mar 6, 2024 13:25:04   #
Shellback Loc: North of Cheyenne Bottoms Wetlands - Kansas
 
ncribble wrote:
No comments on Glasses, which we all have and need them. But I'll share a true story of this morning.

When starting reading the UHG this morning I received a phone call from a Funeral Home wanting to stop by and discuss my future. My reply "No Thank You. I just got New Glasses so I'm good for at least the next 5 years".
Ole Norm



Reply
Mar 6, 2024 14:24:17   #
dbrugger25 Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
RKastner wrote:
For most of my life I've worn glasses.

About 18 years ago I got fed up with spending the money on new glasses every year or two and had LASIK done. I loved not having to wear glasses...especially when it was lightly raining....hell even when it was normal raining. Then I noticed about 2-3 years ago I noticed that my vision was worsening. I pissed me off that I needed glasses again. It turns out that I was starting to get cataracts. I got that taken care of. Just went to the eye doctor and guess what? Yeah....I need glasses again. Yeah....I just turned 65, so this shouldn't be a huge surprise, but I guess it is.

I can't explain it...but this really bothers me. I didn't think that my vision had deteriorated. The great eye doctor told me that if I had an eye test at the DMV that they would fail me and tell me to get an exam. If it wasn't for that I might have ignored it for another year or so. I guess not.

My wife is probably right (aren't they always?) in telling me, "So you need glasses. It's not like they're amputating a limb or something."

I also know why my FIL (when he was alive) got the ugliest glasses there were. My insurance nicely covers getting some nice frames, it's the lenses that kill you. If you want lined bifocals....great! If you want progressive lenses....at least something that gives a decent near vision area....that's extra. Transitions....that's extra. Polycarbonate....that's extra too. So, if you don't read a lot (I do), want a separate set of sunglasses (non-prescription) and heavier lenses...you're fine. Everything nice is extra.

Honestly.....it's not that much worse than when I was working and had vision insurance. I'm just venting.

Thanks for listening to me vent and complain.

Resume your normal programming.
For most of my life I've worn glasses. br br Ab... (show quote)


I have bought my glasses from Costco for years. They are excellent and FAR less expensive. They accept applicable insurance. They sell a metal frame with an unique hinge system that make them almost unbreakable. They all include the tough coatings and UV protection that others charge extra for.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.