Minitman wrote:
Hi Hoggers,
Hope you can help me with this. Took these photos of my granddaughter yesterday. All were taken in Aperture priority in the same room under natural light. Scene in doorway has open windows behind me. Other shots were with windows to right of subject. One is completely underexposed (camera display showed correct exposure) and the other somehow has subject a little over exposed with the rest of the room completely under exposed. I'm at a loss to understand what happened with the underexposed shots - especially the one that looks like I had a spotlight on her letting everything else go black. All were taken ISO 6400, f5.6 (aperture priority mode) the side lite photo 1/3000, the doorway shot 1/60, and the other at 1/1000. Couldn't figure out how to add meta data so let me know what other info you require to form an opinion.
Will appreciate any thoughts on what happened and how to prevent recurrence. This is my first post with attachments so I hope I get it correct.
Thanks in advance.
Dave
Hi Hoggers, br br Hope you can help me with this.... (
show quote)
It seems the issue looks like a problem of high dynamic range: highly bright spots and shadowy areas in the same image, resulting in a highly contrast scene.
As always, the harsher the light, the deeper the shadows: up to 5 stops exposure difference "sun side/shadow side"
In fact, picture #1 shows its exposure is OK.
The light level was probably about EV 11 for this scene which was EVENLY lit.
So, the exposure automatic metering system had no problem to set a correct exposure.
I notice in this scene, the image does'nt show any bright area lit by direct sun shine!
Your equipment produced a correct picture: the spot metering pointed probably onto a "mid tone" area, so the picture went OK.
Picture #2:
I suppose :
a) the spot metering was pointing onto a bright area of her face.
Caucasian skin type= quite bright tone (in fact mini 1 stop brighter than "mid tone").
One can see, she is lit by direct sun shine (=EV15 on "mid tone"...which turns out to be EV 16 on her "white" skin)
b) the dial "Exposure Compensation" remained set at "0".
So, aperture priority "says"..."hey, this "mid tone" is lit by EV 16...that is quite bright...don't burn out the white tones...let me drop the exposure down".
Doing so, the "bright" area is about correctly exposed while the shadowy zones are left in strong under exposure.
What to do to get a better result?
In fact, to reduce the dynamic range, there is really few solution.
One have to decide, either expose for the highlight, or expose for the low light!
I would frame the subject a bit tighter and would let a flash burst just a "fill" (flash exposure comp' set at "-1,7" should be OK).
The background will remain vastly in the dark, but the subject itself will get much less contrast(= becomes more evenly lit)...and if the flash is "off camera" (here, from operator's right side), the subject gets more 3-dimensional.
And what if one will avoid to use flash?
Hélas, there is very few to do except reduce the contrast in "image settings" (set contrast at its minimum)
Picture#3: about the same issue as in picture#2...I suppose the "spotmeter" was pointing onto a bright area, hence the under exposed environnement (I suppose the "Exposure Compensation" dial was set at "0")
Yes, metering correctly is often a challenge.
To counterfight the issue of high dynamic range the rare solutions are
1) either use "additional light" (flash...continuous LED lamp)
2) or set on the subject's shadow side a large white or silver reflector out of frame but as close to subject as possible.
3) or shoot 3 or 4 the same scene but each time at different shutter speed) and then merge those images in post treatment/editing.
Hope this help