Well, I Caved Again...
I do the same thing,....my preference though,..lies in going the opposite direction,......I'm a dinosaur of sorts, using vintage lenses and manual focus in all my work,...not to prove any particular point,....rather preferring to sustaining the enjoyment of manual workflow I first fell in love with in the early 1960's when afflicted with the photography bug.
My experience and images to my seeing achieve an equal outcome to mirrorless counterparts I observe by fellow photographer's work in my humble opinion.
Technically and mathematically I understand the opposite to be factually more than true,....I do not challenge that fact,...but to my seeing my final files and large prints adequately match mirror free camera images,........with these tired old eyes anyway,.... could such images side by side,.....I sometimes wonder,...could only your dog see the the implied difference?,.............lol.
Had my subject of interest over the years been other than landscape, scenic and nature,...say birding or varied moving subect matter, (although at one time I was extensively active in auto circuit racing,....yet managed it well) I might have then gravitated toward the quicker responsiveness of an auto focusing and mirrorless system.
Anyway,.....we all do the same thing,.....different.
.
There are many worse things to purchase than a new camera. If you enjoy your purchase it is the right thing to do. I seldom regret buying something that makes me happy. I just don't have enough money for the big ticket items, like a G650 or better, a new condo in Aruba or more jewelry. I have the cameras I want and the lenses that I will use. My photos are just for my use. I no longer post photos or enter them in contests. Life is pretty great!
niteman3d
Loc: South Central Pennsylvania, USA
B&H had a daily special on a 128gb card for $70, so I bought it just to fill the hole. I will probably just use it as a redundancy since I'm starting out using this one to mirror (pun?) the output of my D7500 which means DX mode, and JPG files, but with more bells and whistles. I love the idea of EVF chimping and seeing the actual exposure before I hit the shutter release. At a later date, I'll get a speedy bigger CFExpress-B card or two for raw and video if I go there. Now I need a new card reader.
Rationalization is weak, gratification is strong.
Robertl594
Loc: Bloomfield Hills, Michigan and Nantucket
No sympathy from me! Just a hearty congratulations! Now, just go enjoy your new camera. Post some pics!
And a big Thank You from Nikon. They appreciate your business.
niteman3d wrote:
Nope, I don't need no stinkin' mirrorless camera and I fer sure don't need no stinkin' full frame. I don't even shoot raw. But they kept it up, they kept showing me stuff till the rationalizer kicked in and my tiny rat brain went to work. What if I get a really good deal on a camera that I really, really want where I can get away with my present lenses for some time to come with no further expense and it will do everything my D7500 and my Z50 will do combined, plus have room for more tricks later if I want to learn them? The pressure was too much. Z7ii on the way. I don't even have the camera yet and I already spent $70 on a memory card (and that was on sale!) and as soon as I get the body to make sure all is well, another $50 or so for a card reader since my old one has no CFExpress type B slot. Might just need another dedicated monopod and maybe a ball head. So much for no further expenses... ah, but then I'll be a really, really great photographer, right? (Did I tell you about the 180-600 they keep showing me?) π
Nope, I don't need no stinkin' mirrorless camera a... (
show quote)
Now take lots of pictures and POST them.
Bridges
Loc: Memphis, Charleston SC, now Nazareth PA
niteman3d wrote:
B&H had a daily special on a 128gb card for $70, so I bought it just to fill the hole. I will probably just use it as a redundancy since I'm starting out using this one to mirror (pun?) the output of my D7500 which means DX mode, and JPG files, but with more bells and whistles. I love the idea of EVF chimping and seeing the actual exposure before I hit the shutter release. At a later date, I'll get a speedy bigger CFExpress-B card or two for raw and video if I go there. Now I need a new card reader.
B&H had a daily special on a 128gb card for $7... (
show quote)
Smart Q readers are inexpensive and work well.
Have one and itβs the go-to. The learning curve is just a wee bit steep after D500 and D850 (still have the 850 - for a while ).
Yes, extra batteries.
Robertl594
Loc: Bloomfield Hills, Michigan and Nantucket
RoswellAlien wrote:
Have one and itβs the go-to. The learning curve is just a wee bit steep after D500 and D850 (still have the 850 - for a while ).
Yes, extra batteries.
You got this one!!! I have confidence in you. Will be fun too.
niteman3d wrote:
Nope, I don't need no stinkin' mirrorless camera and I fer sure don't need no stinkin' full frame. I don't even shoot raw. But they kept it up, they kept showing me stuff till the rationalizer kicked in and my tiny rat brain went to work. What if I get a really good deal on a camera that I really, really want where I can get away with my present lenses for some time to come with no further expense and it will do everything my D7500 and my Z50 will do combined, plus have room for more tricks later if I want to learn them? The pressure was too much. Z7ii on the way. I don't even have the camera yet and I already spent $70 on a memory card (and that was on sale!) and as soon as I get the body to make sure all is well, another $50 or so for a card reader since my old one has no CFExpress type B slot. Might just need another dedicated monopod and maybe a ball head. So much for no further expenses... ah, but then I'll be a really, really great photographer, right? (Did I tell you about the 180-600 they keep showing me?) π
Nope, I don't need no stinkin' mirrorless camera a... (
show quote)
I feel your pain and excitement!π
MrBob
Loc: lookout Mtn. NE Alabama
Martys wrote:
I do the same thing,....my preference though,..lies in going the opposite direction,......I'm a dinosaur of sorts, using vintage lenses and manual focus in all my work,...not to prove any particular point,....rather preferring to sustaining the enjoyment of manual workflow I first fell in love with in the early 1960's when afflicted with the photography bug.
My experience and images to my seeing achieve an equal outcome to mirrorless counterparts I observe by fellow photographer's work in my humble opinion.
Technically and mathematically I understand the opposite to be factually more than true,....I do not challenge that fact,...but to my seeing my final files and large prints adequately match mirror free camera images,........with these tired old eyes anyway,.... could such images side by side,.....I sometimes wonder,...could only your dog see the the implied difference?,.............lol.
Had my subject of interest over the years been other than landscape, scenic and nature,...say birding or varied moving subect matter, (although at one time I was extensively active in auto circuit racing,....yet managed it well) I might have then gravitated toward the quicker responsiveness of an auto focusing and mirrorless system.
Anyway,.....we all do the same thing,.....different.
.
I do the same thing,....my preference though,..lie... (
show quote)
I really enjoyed reading your post... A lot to reflect on. I hope you don't mind if I copied and saved it ?
I have an Canon EOS-R. I only have one RF lens. I have a lot of EF glass and the adapter is so well engineered that many of my EF lenses work better. The camera has a 30mp FF sensor. The biggest drawback for some is that it only gets 8 or 5 fps depending on the mode. For what I do, macro, some landscape and some street photography, I cannot justify upgrading. What would make me upgrade? Better focus, more fps. I have spent money getting better quality lenses.
I had fun with my Nikon D7100 until I got the itch to go full frame just as Nikon announced the D850. I even used my old Nikkor manual focus primes on the D850 and enjoyed the challenge. All was good in my world until last summer when a local camera store hosted an after hours evening with a Nikon ambassador who happened to be the official team photographer for an NFL football team. He had gotten a Z8 to play with prior to its release. Around the same time, on the distant horizon, Alaska was beckoning...I had never been out of the lower 48. I drove home after meeting with Nikon ambassador with one thought in mind...IF I go to Alaska I want a Z8. On Sept. 22nd last year an old friend of mine and I boarded a non stop from Chicago to Anchorage; in my carry on was both my D850 and new Z8. Later, the ferry ride from Valdez to Whittier, across Prince William Sound, sealed the deal; I have barely turned on the D850 except to check the status of its batteries since. For someone who had dug in his heels and refused to consider mirrorless, I was hooked. The Z8 is simply a fun camera to use. With the FTZ II adapter I use my F mount lenses on any Nikon body I have. I have yet to have the new 180-600 Nikkor in my hands; right now I am considering a Nikkor 100-400 with 1.4x TC. My story and I am sticking to it.
Rented an F-mount 80-400 in the past which I liked but never bought. So the first Z mount lens I got for the Z8 was the 100-400 plus the 1.4 teleconverter. Used them at the last F1 race in Austin. Is really good between 135-300mm and okay at 400mm. Never tried it at 560mm for a still subject...yet. I attached what would be an "extreme-ish" example at 560mm, 1/100 sec, ISO-140, -0.3 step of a car at probably close to 150mph.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.