JZA B1 wrote:
Assuming the subject/scene isn't changing quickly and you could go with either faster or slower shutter (adjusting aperture and ISO to compensate and maintain exposure), do you usually go for faster shutter speed or slower?
Any pros and cons on doing it one way vs the other?
Depends on your subject.
I photograph birds in flight. To get their wing tips frozen I try to shoot at 1/4000 sec.
For football, baseball, basketball, volleyball, my main shutter speed is at least 1/2000 sec.
I can also selectively blur images by PANNING with my subject. You need to practice this to be proficient. For instance, when a runner runs past you, keep your camera MOVING as you take the image, try various shutter speeds from say 1/8, 1/15, 1/30, 1/60 sec. and see which you like. You can try this on most subjects, I know some pros that like to use these slow shutter speeds on birds in flight, makes an interesting image.
But, as it appears you are just starting out on your photo journey, you should heavily experiment using various shutter speeds on moving objects.
If I am shooting landscapes, I like to shoot foreground/background images, so I need a small opening, say, f8 to f16 depending on what I am shooting. If I am hand holding, I use an old rule, my shutter speed is equal to at the minimum the focal length of the lens. For example, if I am shooting a 100mm lens, then my minimum shutter speed would be 1/100 sec. if it's a 500mm lens, then my minimum would be 1/500 sec.
Bottom line, many times your choice becomes what you like. SO, you need to experiment a lot with your camera to see what you like. With digital, experimenting is quick and easy. Back in the film days, I used to have to wait until my film was developed before I could see the results. Now you can see it right away.
So, get out there and shoot shoot shoot and shoot some more.
Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.