Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
The Attic
Can you spell “DICTATOR “?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Feb 11, 2024 19:06:45   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
DaveO wrote:
Are you that much out if the loop?


Did YOU know it was mediabiasfactcheck.com not one of the other “rating” services?

Ad fontes
All sides
Duke Reporters’ Lab Fact Check
FactCheck
FlackCheck
Media Bias / Fact Check
NPR Fact Checker
PolitiFact
Poynter
SciCheck
Snopes
Washington Post Fact Checker

https://library.csi.cuny.edu/c.php?g=619342&p=4310783
~~~~~~~~~~~

Like many other subjects / locations things need to be subjected to the C.R.A.A.P. Test.
Currency, Relevancy, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose.

There is too much information on the World Wide Web.

How can we distinguish what is factual, reliable, and trustworthy?

The C.R.A.A.P. test is a way to evaluate any type of information, including Web Sites.
Originally created by Sarah Blakeslee, of the University of California at Chico's Meriam Library.

Currency (when?):

1. What is the date of publication?

2. Does the source use recent information?

3. Are the references and/or links current?

4. Does currency matter for this topic? Why or why not?

Relevancy (what?) :

1. What aspect of your research question(s) does this source answer?

2. Is the intended audience appropriate for academic research?

3. Does this source provide a new perspective or piece of information?

4. Is this information related to your research?

Authority (who?) :

1. What credentials does the author have?

2. Does the author have any relevant affiliations with a respected university or organization?

3. What can you find about the author online?

4. Has the author published on this subject before?

Accuracy (what?) :

1. Does the source contain any false information or errors?

2. Does the source use reputable sources to support the claims made?

3. Is the information on the web site verifiable and supported by evidence?

4. Does the information seem complete, or are facts missing?

Purpose (why?) :

1. Is this information fact or opinion?

2. Why did the author create this web site?

3. What is the purpose of this web site?

4. Is this web site advertising a product or service?

5. Is it educational or informative?


Also @ https://library.csi.cuny.edu/c.php?g=619342&p=7765946 > Evaluating Web Sites.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It would be a good test to apply to THIS forum as well . . . .

Reply
Feb 11, 2024 19:19:43   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Wyantry wrote:
Did YOU know it was mediabiasfactcheck.com not one of the other “rating” services?

Ad fontes
All sides
Duke Reporters’ Lab Fact Check
FactCheck
FlackCheck
Media Bias / Fact Check
NPR Fact Checker
PolitiFact
Poynter
SciCheck
Snopes
Washington Post Fact Checker

https://library.csi.cuny.edu/c.php?g=619342&p=4310783
~~~~~~~~~~~

Like many other subjects / locations things need to be subjected to the C.R.A.A.P. Test.
Currency, Relevancy, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose.

There is too much information on the World Wide Web.

How can we distinguish what is factual, reliable, and trustworthy?

The C.R.A.A.P. test is a way to evaluate any type of information, including Web Sites.
Originally created by Sarah Blakeslee, of the University of California at Chico's Meriam Library.

Currency (when?):

1. What is the date of publication?

2. Does the source use recent information?

3. Are the references and/or links current?

4. Does currency matter for this topic? Why or why not?

Relevancy (what?) :

1. What aspect of your research question(s) does this source answer?

2. Is the intended audience appropriate for academic research?

3. Does this source provide a new perspective or piece of information?

4. Is this information related to your research?

Authority (who?) :

1. What credentials does the author have?

2. Does the author have any relevant affiliations with a respected university or organization?

3. What can you find about the author online?

4. Has the author published on this subject before?

Accuracy (what?) :

1. Does the source contain any false information or errors?

2. Does the source use reputable sources to support the claims made?

3. Is the information on the web site verifiable and supported by evidence?

4. Does the information seem complete, or are facts missing?

Purpose (why?) :

1. Is this information fact or opinion?

2. Why did the author create this web site?

3. What is the purpose of this web site?

4. Is this web site advertising a product or service?

5. Is it educational or informative?


Also @ https://library.csi.cuny.edu/c.php?g=619342&p=7765946 > Evaluating Web Sites.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It would be a good test to apply to THIS forum as well . . . .
Did YOU know it was mediabiasfactcheck.com not one... (show quote)



Per usual, I'm sure everyone here is duly impressed with you!

Reply
Feb 11, 2024 19:32:02   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
Wyantry wrote:
Did YOU know it was mediabiasfactcheck.com not one of the other “rating” services?

Ad fontes
All sides
Duke Reporters’ Lab Fact Check
FactCheck
FlackCheck
Media Bias / Fact Check
NPR Fact Checker
PolitiFact
Poynter
SciCheck
Snopes
Washington Post Fact Checker

https://library.csi.cuny.edu/c.php?g=619342&p=4310783
~~~~~~~~~~~

Like many other subjects / locations things need to be subjected to the C.R.A.A.P. Test.
Currency, Relevancy, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose.

There is too much information on the World Wide Web.

How can we distinguish what is factual, reliable, and trustworthy?

The C.R.A.A.P. test is a way to evaluate any type of information, including Web Sites.
Originally created by Sarah Blakeslee, of the University of California at Chico's Meriam Library.

Currency (when?):

1. What is the date of publication?

2. Does the source use recent information?

3. Are the references and/or links current?

4. Does currency matter for this topic? Why or why not?

Relevancy (what?) :

1. What aspect of your research question(s) does this source answer?

2. Is the intended audience appropriate for academic research?

3. Does this source provide a new perspective or piece of information?

4. Is this information related to your research?

Authority (who?) :

1. What credentials does the author have?

2. Does the author have any relevant affiliations with a respected university or organization?

3. What can you find about the author online?

4. Has the author published on this subject before?

Accuracy (what?) :

1. Does the source contain any false information or errors?

2. Does the source use reputable sources to support the claims made?

3. Is the information on the web site verifiable and supported by evidence?

4. Does the information seem complete, or are facts missing?

Purpose (why?) :

1. Is this information fact or opinion?

2. Why did the author create this web site?

3. What is the purpose of this web site?

4. Is this web site advertising a product or service?

5. Is it educational or informative?


Also @ https://library.csi.cuny.edu/c.php?g=619342&p=7765946 > Evaluating Web Sites.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It would be a good test to apply to THIS forum as well . . . .
Did YOU know it was mediabiasfactcheck.com not one... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2024 19:42:05   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
DaveO wrote:
Per usual, I'm sure everyone here is duly impressed with you!


Ahh, so YOU did not know either !


I am gladdened to have been of service — spreading t***h, joy and happiness — countering some of the inaccurate and misleading claims made by others.

Reply
Feb 11, 2024 19:47:48   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
By all means, continue to impress yourself. It is quite doubtful that anyone actually cares about your typical love affair with yourself.

Blow your socks off and prattle on. Alone.

Reply
Feb 11, 2024 20:50:33   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
DaveO wrote:
By all means, continue to impress yourself. It is quite doubtful that anyone actually cares about your typical love affair with yourself.

Blow your socks off and prattle on. Alone.


When the C.R.A.A.P. Test is run on your comments, guess what?

You fail on all categories and all points within those categories.

Congratulations ! On being such a know-nothing twit. You are evidently going “above-and-beyond” in your efforts to verify your own ignorance and incivility.

Reply
Feb 12, 2024 04:40:38   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Wyantry wrote:
When the C.R.A.A.P. Test is run on your comments, guess what?

You fail on all categories and all points within those categories.

Congratulations ! On being such a know-nothing twit. You are evidently going “above-and-beyond” in your efforts to verify your own ignorance and incivility.


Lol, the pretentious blowhard rears his ugly head! Can always count on you to show what a flaming *-* you are. Just another typical diatribe from the forum richard-head! Insults and all, boohoohoo!

Too deny a factual explanation of a common event here on the Hogg is just plain stupid, but normal for the resident pretentious forum blowhard! Yes, you are truly an expert on placing your own "ignorance and incivility" on display. Quite a repetitive exercise for you!

Prattle on as you normally do in most threads you crap on.

Reply
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Feb 12, 2024 07:13:16   #
Canisdirus
 
If you think Trump acts anything like an actual dictator...you are...uneducated.

Reply
Feb 12, 2024 07:43:03   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
Canisdirus wrote:
If you think Trump acts anything like an actual dictator...you are...uneducated.


He has always been a dictator in his own little world

and now he wants to branch out into your world.

Reply
Feb 12, 2024 08:14:35   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Kraken wrote:
He has always been a dictator in his own little world

and now he wants to branch out into your world.


He is also undoubtedly a blowhard extraordinaire, but we have our own here on the Hogg!

Reply
Feb 12, 2024 10:37:53   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
DaveO wrote:
Lol, the pretentious blowhard rears his ugly head! Can always count on you to show what a flaming *-* you are. Just another typical diatribe from the forum richard-head! Insults and all, boohoohoo!

Too deny a factual explanation of a common event here on the Hogg is just plain stupid, but normal for the resident pretentious forum blowhard! Yes, you are truly an expert on placing your own "ignorance and incivility" on display. Quite a repetitive exercise for you!

Prattle on as you normally do in most threads you crap on.
Lol, the pretentious blowhard rears his ugly head!... (show quote)


I am always happy to use the C.R.A.A.P. Analysis on your crap.

Reply
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Feb 12, 2024 10:49:52   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Wyantry wrote:
I am always happy to use the C.R.A.A.P. Analysis on your crap.


Boohoohoo!

The pretentious blowhard continuuuuuuuuuuues. LOL, what a maroon!

BTW, you started the crap, so keep on whining!

Reply
Feb 12, 2024 15:11:28   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
DaveO wrote:
Boohoohoo!

The pretentious blowhard continuuuuuuuuuuues. LOL, what a maroon!

BTW, you started the crap, so keep on whining!



What started your diatribes and insulting behavior was a simple question:

“Did YOU know it was mediabiasfactcheck.com not one of the other “rating” services?

Ad fontes, All sides, Duke Reporters’ Lab Fact Check, FactCheck, FlackCheck, Media Bias / Fact Check, NPR Fact Checker, PolitiFact, Poynter, SciCheck, Snopes, Washington Post Fact Checker”


You DID provide an explanation of Kraken’s lack of references — not in answer to my question, but to someone else’s. That was nice of you.


But then you had to go off on an insulting rant. And NEVER even had the decency to bother to explain a reason for doing so.

When provided with a rational methodology to question sources (the C.R.A.A.P. analysis-structure) you chose to just shovel out more of your own crap.

Crap is what you evidently specialize and revel in. It is sincerely hoped you are content residing in the mental-cesspool of your own making.

So I found a cartoon-picture that certainly fits your persona.

Its YOU !



Reply
Feb 12, 2024 15:27:54   #
Canisdirus
 
Kraken wrote:
He has always been a dictator in his own little world

and now he wants to branch out into your world.


An...uneducated opinion.
You are...easily manipulated.

Reply
Feb 12, 2024 15:36:12   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Wyantry wrote:
What started your diatribes and insulting behavior was a simple question:

“Did YOU know it was mediabiasfactcheck.com not one of the other “rating” services?

Ad fontes, All sides, Duke Reporters’ Lab Fact Check, FactCheck, FlackCheck, Media Bias / Fact Check, NPR Fact Checker, PolitiFact, Poynter, SciCheck, Snopes, Washington Post Fact Checker”


You DID provide an explanation of Kraken’s lack of references — not in answer to my question, but to someone else’s. That was nice of you.


But then you had to go off on an insulting rant. And NEVER even had the decency to bother to explain a reason for doing so.

When provided with a rational methodology to question sources (the C.R.A.A.P. analysis-structure) you chose to just shovel out more of your own crap.

Crap is what you evidently specialize and revel in. It is sincerely hoped you are content residing in the mental-cesspool of your own making.

So I found a cartoon-picture that certainly fits your persona.

Its YOU !
What started your diatribes and insulting behavior... (show quote)


Lol, again you fall back with your behavioral projections on others. Quite noticeable on many of your threads.
You are so infatuated with yourself that you are quite the little spectacle!

I don't have the time or the inclination to argue with a liar and pretentious blowhard.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.