Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Choosing the Perfect Print Resolution for Your Photos
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
Feb 7, 2024 03:47:57   #
paulrnzpn Loc: New Zealand
 
Choosing the Perfect Print Resolution for Your Photos
Posted: 02/05/2024
www.picturecorrect.com


Creating high-quality prints of photographs involves numerous considerations, with one of the most critical being the print resolution. The print resolution, measured in dots per inch (DPI), determines the level of detail and clarity of the printed image. The optimal DPI setting depends on various factors, including the purpose of the print, the viewing distance, and the capabilities of the printer. In this blog post, we’ll explore how to choose the right print resolution for your photographs to ensure the best quality.



Understanding Print Resolution

Print resolution refers to the number of dots of ink a printer can produce within an inch. A higher DPI means more dots per inch, resulting in a sharper and more detailed image. However, the effectiveness of high DPI values depends on the printer’s capabilities and the quality of the original photograph.


Standard Print Resolutions

Low-Resolution Prints (72 to 100 DPI): Suitable for large banners or prints that will be viewed from a distance. At close range, the image will appear pixelated.
Medium Resolution Prints (150 to 300 DPI): Ideal for standard photo prints, such as 4×6 inches or 5×7 inches. This range provides a good balance between quality and file size.
High-Resolution Prints (300 to 600 DPI): Recommended for high-quality prints, especially for professional photographs or detailed artwork. This range is often used for prints that will be viewed up close, such as portrait photographs or fine art prints.


Factors to Consider

1) Purpose of the Print: Determine what the print will be used for. Decorative art pieces or professional portraits require higher resolutions than a standard photo album print.
2) Viewing Distance: Consider how close viewers will be to the print. The closer the viewing distance, the higher the resolution should be to maintain image clarity.
3) Printer Capabilities: Ensure your printer can handle the desired DPI. Some consumer-grade printers may not print effectively at very high resolutions, leading to wasted ink without a noticeable increase in quality.
4) Original Photo Quality: The resolution of the original photograph limits the print resolution. Enlarging a low-resolution photo for a high-DPI print can result in a blurry image.


Recommended Resolutions by Print Size

Small Prints (up to 5×7 inches): 300 DPI is typically sufficient for clear and detailed prints.
Medium Prints (8×10 to 11×14 inches): 300 DPI is still recommended, though you can sometimes get away with a slightly lower resolution if the original photo quality is high.
Large Prints (larger than 11×14 inches): 200-300 DPI can be adequate, especially for prints viewed from a moderate distance. For very large prints or banners viewed from further away, 150 DPI might be sufficient.


Recap:
Choosing the right print resolution is vital for producing high-quality photographs. While 300 DPI is a good standard for most prints, consider the purpose, viewing distance, printer capabilities, and original photo quality when determining the best resolution for your needs. Experimenting with different resolutions and print sizes can also help you find the perfect balance for your specific project. Remember, a higher DPI isn’t always better; it’s about finding the right setting for the desired outcome.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 05:44:04   #
Leinik Loc: Rochester NY
 
??? This is kind of problematic and is missing the point.
"Dot (of ink) per inch, is a printer's resolution. It is far higher than what is mentioned here on photo printers: 1400 to 2800 dpi most of the time. Once you have chosen it it does not change whatever the resolution of your file expressed in pixels per inch
Print resolution (pixels per inch) recommended is usually 300 ppi although down to 200 ppi most human eyes will not see the difference.
In other words an 8x10" print made of 800x1000 pixels (a resolution of 100 ppi) can very well be printed with a printer resolution of 2800 dpi.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 07:52:10   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
I just use large files (full data of the image) and let the printer driver work out the details.

Reply
 
 
Feb 7, 2024 08:50:09   #
f8lee Loc: New Mexico
 
Leinik wrote:
??? This is kind of problematic and is missing the point.
"Dot (of ink) per inch, is a printer's resolution. It is far higher than what is mentioned here on photo printers: 1400 to 2800 dpi most of the time. Once you have chosen it it does not change whatever the resolution of your file expressed in pixels per inch
Print resolution (pixels per inch) recommended is usually 300 ppi although down to 200 ppi most human eyes will not see the difference.
In other words an 8x10" print made of 800x1000 pixels (a resolution of 100 ppi) can very well be printed with a printer resolution of 2800 dpi.
??? This is kind of problematic and is missing the... (show quote)


As I understand it, the figures given by printer manufacturers (no doubt coerced by the marketing teams) are not indicative of how fine a series of lines can be actually printed on the substrate - because neither the platen nor the carriage have the physical ability to move in such minute distances. Rather, those 1440 and 2880 numbers refer to the size of the actual ink droplets that are "spit" from the print head - which can impact how finely and smoothly the CYM colors can blend and thus make for perhaps smoother tonal gradients. Of course, using that thinking, I guess dye sublimation printers could be advertised as having a billion DPI capability since the sublimated dye gasses are mixing at the molecular level.

Even the actual printer drivers (the program that runs the printer at the machine level) are not as fine tuned as 1440 DPI - as I understand it smaller printers' drivers might have a 720 DPI while larger format printers are 360 or so DPI.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 10:41:11   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
Longshadow wrote:
I just use large files (full data of the image) and let the printer driver work out the details.


Exactly! Current inkjet photo grade printers using their drivers, and connected to post processing software, make DPI calculations meaningless in my workflow. With sharpening, noise reduction and resizing tools, good prints can be built without the math.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 11:10:34   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
bsprague wrote:
Exactly! Current inkjet photo grade printers using their drivers, and connected to post processing software, make DPI calculations meaningless in my workflow. With sharpening, noise reduction and resizing tools, good prints can be built without the math.


Reply
Feb 7, 2024 11:17:52   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAAHAHAHA

On the floor laughing. And, given this is February 7 of 2024, I'm also crying this utter nonsense continues to be posted and shared anywhere outside the darkest corners of the web.

THERE ARE NO DOTS IN ANY PIXEL-BASED IMAGES.

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHA

Reply
 
 
Feb 7, 2024 11:22:03   #
BebuLamar
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAAHAHAHA

On the floor laughing. And, given this is February 7 of 2024, I'm also crying this utter nonsense continues to be posted and shared anywhere outside the darkest corners of the web.

THERE ARE NO DOTS IN ANY PIXEL-BASED IMAGES.

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHA


Take an inkjet print and the loupe out you see a lots of dots.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 11:23:29   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Take an inkjet print and the loupe out you see a lots of dots.


HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAAHAHAHA

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 11:31:05   #
BebuLamar
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAAHAHAHA


Your images may not have any dots but when you look at the prints or the image on the screens all there are dots and nothing else.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 11:36:08   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Your images may not have any dots but when you look at the prints or the image on the screens all there are dots and nothing else.


HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAAHAHAHA

When I look at a pixel-based image on a pixel-based display device, I only see pixels .....

Reply
 
 
Feb 7, 2024 11:38:21   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Take an inkjet print and the loupe out you see a lots of dots.

DOTS, not pixels in a printer.
In the camera there are pixels, not dots.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 11:44:37   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Longshadow wrote:
DOTS, not pixels in a printer.
In the camera there are pixels, not dots.


Just for the edification of the entire UHH community, how many pixels are in a dot?

Or, is it how many dots are in a pixel?

Being 2024, surely there must be someone with the knowledge of either of these basic ratios, right ????

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 11:54:57   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAAHAHAHA

When I look at a pixel-based image on a pixel-based display device, I only see pixels .....


So our cameras take images using pixels.
You might look at the monitor on your camera to view the image, but more likely you download the image and view it on your computer monitor because it's larger and easier to see detail.
If you look closely at your monitor you will see dots. The dots might be square (who says dots have to be round?) but they are discrete red/green/blue dots. It might take a lot of them to make up a pixel, depending on how you display the image. OR, there might be a lot of pixels that are compressed into a dot.

Semantics.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 11:58:35   #
f8lee Loc: New Mexico
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
So our cameras take images using pixels.
You might look at the monitor on your camera to view the image, but more likely you download the image and view it on your computer monitor because it's larger and easier to see detail.
If you look closely at your monitor you will see dots. The dots might be square (who says dots have to be round?) but they are discrete red/green/blue dots. It might take a lot of them to make up a pixel, depending on how you display the image.

Semantics.


Well, technically, the camera generates pixels based on the photon counts in adjacent photo sites that have red, Green or Blue filters on top of them, right? So even that begs the question of how one defines a pixel...is it the individual photosite or the blend that creates a given color at a point in the X/Y array?

Reply
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.