"Is this the end of OM Digital? Or is there more exciting stuff is coming down the road?" Your thoughts on the "updates"
Feb 3, 2024 21:19:15 #
Canisdirus wrote:
It's a minor upgade...in less than two years...the new lens is...meh...and overpriced big time.
Tea leaves...some can read them...some cannot.
Tea leaves...some can read them...some cannot.
Get caught in a lie and just ignore it and keep parroting the same nonsense.
I can tell what is gonna go by the wayside, the dire wolf. Oh wait, it is already extinct.
Feb 4, 2024 03:59:09 #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Get caught in a lie and just ignore it and keep parroting the same nonsense.
I can tell what is gonna go by the wayside, the dire wolf. Oh wait, it is already extinct.
I can tell what is gonna go by the wayside, the dire wolf. Oh wait, it is already extinct.
What lie...oh you are a drama queen aren't you.
It's the same old sensor...
Feb 4, 2024 12:26:01 #
Canisdirus wrote:
What lie...oh you are a drama queen aren't you.
It's the same old sensor...
It's the same old sensor...
You keep saying that. Can you explain how it’s the same old sensor if it’s a stacked sensor and the old one isn’t? No? I didn’t think so.
Feb 4, 2024 18:24:59 #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
You keep saying that. Can you explain how it’s the same old sensor if it’s a stacked sensor and the old one isn’t? No? I didn’t think so.
It's the same technology...just stacked...OM-Systems can't get off a 20MP sensor.
That's why it is the same old sensor...not saying it's a twin...it is tweaked up no doubt.
Don't answer your own questions btw in the same sentence...it is rude.
Feb 5, 2024 02:33:33 #
Canisdirus wrote:
It's the same technology...just stacked...OM-Systems can't get off a 20MP sensor.
That's why it is the same old sensor...not saying it's a twin...it is tweaked up no doubt.
Don't answer your own questions btw in the same sentence...it is rude.
That's why it is the same old sensor...not saying it's a twin...it is tweaked up no doubt.
Don't answer your own questions btw in the same sentence...it is rude.
Wow, you really don’t have a clue. And you calling anyone else rude is hilarious.
Feb 5, 2024 05:42:55 #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Wow, you really don’t have a clue. And you calling anyone else rude is hilarious.
Same ol' sensor...can't get off of 20 mp...same ol' sensor.
I have enough clues to know when a corporation hasn't enough capital to expand and innovate.
OM-D has zero intention of being that sort of company.
They can do the math...that you ignore.
Feb 5, 2024 09:42:28 #
Canisdirus wrote:
Same ol' sensor...can't get off of 20 mp...same ol' sensor.
I have enough clues to know when a corporation hasn't enough capital to expand and innovate.
OM-D has zero intention of being that sort of company.
They can do the math...that you ignore.
I have enough clues to know when a corporation hasn't enough capital to expand and innovate.
OM-D has zero intention of being that sort of company.
They can do the math...that you ignore.
You can try and spin what you say all you want, but it’s easy to see right through you. First you say they’re just using up the same old sensor leftover from previous models. Then you claim it’s the old sensor but they tweaked it. I point out that it’s a stacked BSI sensor, completely different technology that can’t be achieved by “tweaking” old sensors. So now it’s the same old sensor because it’s still 20mp, (which is plenty for most people). I guess Sony really blew it with the A9III since all they did was tweak the same old 24mp sensor.
Feb 7, 2024 19:33:32 #
wdross wrote:
gwilliams6, I have no reason to doubt your informa... (show quote)
First I think the OM-1 system is very good and most OM-1 users seem really thrilled with the advances and that 150-600mm lens, whatever its internal origins. I have no personal experience using the new OM-1 version 2, or that 150-600mm lens.
I can only base my comments here on what those that actually have tested and reviewed the system are reporting.
My thread headline is from the headline of the youtube video I linked, not my personal words, that is why I have it in quotations.
Adding tweaks to this Sigma lens, is that worth the extra $1200 USD over the $1400 USD price of the Sigma fulflrame 150-600mm DG DN version? Some reviewers, including some OM users think that is a bit too much, and too big and heavy for micro 4/3rds.
I have no bone to pick in this one. For OM-1 system users, enjoy the new stuff and the new lens, and be happy.
The reality is that when micro 4/3rds starts costing the same and even more than fullframe gear and starts to have lenses that weigh the same as fullframe lenses, IMHO it becomes harder to sell the advantages of size, weight and cost of micro 4/3rds vs the image quality disadvantages inherent in the smaller sensor size of micro 4/3rds. .
Cheers and best to you.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.