Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Filters or no filters? How do you feel about post-processing tools shaping your final image?
Page <<first <prev 10 of 11 next>
Jan 30, 2024 17:16:37   #
dick ranez
 
Life would be boring with no choices

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 07:43:22   #
Artcameraman Loc: Springfield NH
 
So true.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 18:52:46   #
ronpier Loc: Poland Ohio
 
JZA B1 wrote:
I guess there is a difference between adjusting white balance and some Snapchat filter people apply to pics of their breakfast that completely changes the image.

Some post-processing is always (or almost always) required. Yet, when I look at some pics out there, they are just not realistic because of all the filters people apply.

It's like an attempt to make a boring pic exciting by using filters.

Where do you draw the line when processing your pictures? What do you consider necessary?
I guess there is a difference between adjusting wh... (show quote)


I shoot JPEG and my camera does a nice job of most post processing. Where I am not completely satisfied I will tweak the final results in Apple Photos to where I prefer.

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2024 07:28:35   #
Artcameraman Loc: Springfield NH
 
If it works for you go for it. JPG are 8 bit per pixel not great if you manipulate then print. If you don't print most will never know.

Reply
Feb 1, 2024 11:34:00   #
Canisdirus
 
JZA B1 wrote:
I guess there is a difference between adjusting white balance and some Snapchat filter people apply to pics of their breakfast that completely changes the image.

Some post-processing is always (or almost always) required. Yet, when I look at some pics out there, they are just not realistic because of all the filters people apply.

It's like an attempt to make a boring pic exciting by using filters.

Where do you draw the line when processing your pictures? What do you consider necessary?
I guess there is a difference between adjusting wh... (show quote)


Photography is art...not every picture is supposed to be realistic.

Reply
Feb 1, 2024 12:44:29   #
Artcameraman Loc: Springfield NH
 
Yes.

Reply
Feb 1, 2024 13:02:12   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Artcameraman wrote:
Yes.


Wonderful contribution. Note your refusal to use <quote reply> makes many of your replies unintelligible.

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2024 11:36:36   #
JZA B1
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
The grass is always greener when you process with PhotoShop.


LOL, that's true.

Reply
Feb 2, 2024 14:02:21   #
Mwilliamsphotography Loc: Royal Oak Michigan & Palm Harbor Florida
 
No more than I did in the dark room. Used different contrast and different surface texture photo papers, different filters on camera lens and on the enlarger lens, used various chemicals to get different looks and different feels or tints ... etc. etc. etc.

Then retouching was done for non-journalistic work, especially commercial product work, portraits, fashion, and glamor photography.

The bad thing about digital filters is every tasteless mag-pie applies to much of whatever they think looks cool ... mostly it's cringeworthy at best.

Reply
Feb 2, 2024 15:24:40   #
All1317
 
Back in film era taking a good shot was half the battle to get it rt the first time is better but now because ur 'film' or reusable u can take several shots to get it rt try that first and see if u have less work on fixing ur mistakes later because we no longer throw out mistakes we erase them

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 05:14:32   #
Artcameraman Loc: Springfield NH
 
I cut a lot of myCC filters to fit and now use them on my cameras.

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2024 13:58:40   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
When I am using a Nikon full frame mirrorless camera I always have a UV filter on the lens, unless I am shooting JPEG. Otherwise, I use Lightroom and rely completely on natural light. Not with zoom lenses, though, just with prime lenses.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 16:22:33   #
TLym45 Loc: Williamsburg, VA
 
kpmac wrote:
I don't set limits. I process my images to look like I want them to look; or as close as I can get to what I was shooting for.


I side with kpmac.
A photo does not always do justice to the scene -- or at least to that which I envisioned when I made the click. I will frequently go "beyond the click" to bring the image closer to that which I saw at the time, or what I feel as I revisit the digital rendering. To paraphrase a quote attributed to Pablo Picasso: "I don't [print] what I see, I [print] what I feel."
Impressionist Edgar Degas is famous for his proclaiming "Art is not what you see, but what you make others see."

There should always remain the freedom of interpretation, whether applying brush to a canvas or arranging pixels on the monitor. It is the artist's privilege to see things as he or she wishes them to be seen.

Thanks for the forum to voice an opinion,
TL at DiPixns.com

Reply
Feb 4, 2024 06:12:46   #
Artcameraman Loc: Springfield NH
 
Very true.

Reply
Feb 5, 2024 08:35:16   #
Lucian Loc: From Wales, living in Ohio
 
You have to remember that a lot of people have no idea as to how much PP is too much. They were never educated in this direction so have no idea what is required. It is a bit like someone who buys a pan and pot and some spices and suddenly considers themselves a chef.

They have heard that you put salt into a meal you are making to improve its tastes, however, they have no idea how much to use, and when not to use it. So, consequently, they use it every time and more often than not, far too much of it, so all their meals are way over salted, yet no one bothers to tell them or help them learn a better way to use salt.

So many images I see, are over sharpened and or over saturated with an HDR process.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 11 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.