Informal poll: What 61MP body do you use ?
Dec 21, 2023 13:31:57 #
Dec 21, 2023 13:38:17 #
jbk224 wrote:
IMO, the more MPs you have, the better!
See 1 MP (HorseJournals, 2/21/21, Melanie Huggett, Robin Duncan Photography)
See many MPs (same attribution)
See 1 MP (HorseJournals, 2/21/21, Melanie Huggett, Robin Duncan Photography)
See many MPs (same attribution)
Some won't get it and others jump in without reading previous posts.
Dec 21, 2023 13:58:19 #
EJMcD wrote:
Some won't get it and others jump in without reading previous posts.
Cant really blame them for not reading the previous posts. Ive read those six pages of defensiveness about owning "wonderfully inferior" 3rd rate cameras. Really sickening.
Dec 21, 2023 14:03:16 #
MrBob wrote:
How does a simple question migrate into a comment such as “ Also ran, simple, no count “ cameras ? I thought this was just a survey regarding use of a certain MP camera.
It's all OPINION and everybody has one. An opinion is just that. No one is right, no one is wrong. Some folks are happy with just sharing images on their cell phones in which case MP count matters very little. My OPINION is...if it's a great image print it, frame it, and hang it on a wall. My 20.8 megapixel camera handles that nicely.
Dec 21, 2023 14:04:00 #
What you may lack in talent can be accomplished with another 30 megapixels.
Dec 21, 2023 14:06:47 #
User ID wrote:
Cant really blame them for not reading the previous posts. Ive read those six pages of defensiveness about owning "wonderfully inferior" 3rd rate cameras. Really sickening.
Some are pleased with what they have and don't care if it it s "third rate camera".
Some simply don't have to have the best, largest, up-to-date camera.
Some do.........
Dec 21, 2023 14:09:43 #
Longshadow wrote:
Some are pleased with what they have and don't care if it it s "third rate camera".
Some simply don't have to have the best, largest, up-to-date camera.
Some do.........
Some are pleased with what they have and don't care if it it s "third rate camera".
Some simply don't have to have the best, largest, up-to-date camera.
Some do.........
Still happy with my aging, mirrored D5.
Dec 21, 2023 14:17:48 #
If I had the money, I'd try a Sony A7RV ... but that will probably never happen.
On the other end, I'd like to try the last Olympus, the OM SYSTEM OLYMPUS OM-1. But that will probably never happen either.
For now, I love my old Sony A77. It works. It's paid for. I know how to use it.
On the other end, I'd like to try the last Olympus, the OM SYSTEM OLYMPUS OM-1. But that will probably never happen either.
For now, I love my old Sony A77. It works. It's paid for. I know how to use it.
Dec 21, 2023 14:45:49 #
KTJohnson wrote:
If I had the money, I'd try a Sony A7RV ... but that will probably never happen.
On the other end, I'd like to try the last Olympus, the OM SYSTEM OLYMPUS OM-1. But that will probably never happen either.
For now, I love my old Sony A77. It works. It's paid for. I know how to use it.
On the other end, I'd like to try the last Olympus, the OM SYSTEM OLYMPUS OM-1. But that will probably never happen either.
For now, I love my old Sony A77. It works. It's paid for. I know how to use it.
I've seen your classic/custom car photos. Your eye would work well behind any camera.
Dec 21, 2023 14:54:22 #
EJMcD wrote:
Still happy with my aging, mirrored D5.
As am I with my T1i.
Dec 21, 2023 14:55:16 #
User ID wrote:
You seem to take that as negativity. Whether thaz ... (show quote)
Ok... I forget, this is UGH... Everyone NOT having the latest and greatest has an inferiority complex and are as you refer to them as " Bottom Feeders ". I am not going to debate with you as it is non productive. I answered your question #1 and also question #2. Is that not what you wanted ? I was NOT defending ANY position, just responding to your inquiry... Do we ALWAYS have to use derogatiory adjectives and adverbs about EVERYTHING and EVERYONE...
Dec 21, 2023 14:58:51 #
MrBob wrote:
Ok... I forget, this is UGH... Everyone NOT having the latest and greatest has an inferiority complex and are as you refer to them as " Bottom Feeders ". I am not going to debate with you as it is non productive. I answered your question #1 and also question #2. Is that not what you wanted ? I was NOT defending ANY position, just responding to your inquiry... Do we ALWAYS have to use derogatiory adjectives and adverbs about EVERYTHING and EVERYONE...
Everyone knows that's his style.
Dec 21, 2023 15:08:18 #
BEST is always better than you can afford. Always been that way. Always will.
Dec 21, 2023 15:35:21 #
travelwp wrote:
Thank you for this information. Since some lenses have a better reputation than others, there must be some measure by which they can be rated.
MTF-standard sharpness testing is one universal standard of testing resolution of lenses.
As posted before, here is the MTF-Standard Sharpness tests results for fullframe E-mount lenses tested on the 61mp Sony A7RIV/A7RV.
And if you read the SAB article (Sony Alpha Blog) they explain why better lens sharpness (resolution) matters more to resolve high megapixel sensors.
https://sonyalpha.blog/2019/11/10/which-lenses-to-maximise-the-potential-of-the-sony-a7riv/
Cheers and best to you.
Dec 21, 2023 15:36:04 #
KTJohnson wrote:
If I had the money, I'd try a Sony A7RV ... but that will probably never happen.
On the other end, I'd like to try the last Olympus, the OM SYSTEM OLYMPUS OM-1. But that will probably never happen either.
For now, I love my old Sony A77. It works. It's paid for. I know how to use it.
On the other end, I'd like to try the last Olympus, the OM SYSTEM OLYMPUS OM-1. But that will probably never happen either.
For now, I love my old Sony A77. It works. It's paid for. I know how to use it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.