Nikon 80-400mm
Dec 20, 2023 13:10:24 #
Groye
Loc: Lancaster, Pa
I want to purchase Telephoto lens, I have a 70-200 2.8 just need something a little longer. Looking for some feed back on the Nikon 200-500 and the Nikon 80-400. Thanks
Dec 20, 2023 13:15:22 #
Groye wrote:
I want to purchase Telephoto lens, I have a 70-200 2.8 just need something a little longer. Looking for some feed back on the Nikon 200-500 and the Nikon 80-400. Thanks
I am very happy with both. Aside from image quality, I don't know what's important to you. Feel free to pose any questions.
Dec 20, 2023 13:29:27 #
Groye wrote:
I want to purchase Telephoto lens, I have a 70-200 2.8 just need something a little longer. Looking for some feed back on the Nikon 200-500 and the Nikon 80-400. Thanks
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/search-topic-list?q=nikon+80-400§num=0&username=
---
Dec 20, 2023 13:32:56 #
Groye
Loc: Lancaster, Pa
EJMcD wrote:
I am very happy with both. Aside from image quality, I don't know what's important to you. Feel free to pose any questions.
I shoot mostly sports, Softball,baseball and Basketball
Dec 20, 2023 13:40:41 #
Photoladybon
Loc: Long Island
Groye wrote:
I shoot mostly sports, Softball,baseball and Basketball
I would encourage you to go with the 200-500. Better lens. I had both and thought the 200 500 produced sharper images.
Dec 20, 2023 14:14:00 #
Groye wrote:
I shoot mostly sports, Softball,baseball and Basketball
Of course sports! I'm a big fan of Zooms. Many will argue that prime lenses are always better but you can't underestimate the versatility of a quality zoom. I use the 80-400 for indoor sports (basketball, volleyball) when shooting from the stands. I use the 200-500 for outdoor (football, soccer, baseball). I often bring both to such events. As Nikon lenses go, the 200-500 is a reasonably priced way to get out to 500. Although neither would be considered a fast lens, the combination of Vibration Reduction and the High ISO capability of today's cameras compensates quite admirably.
I do have two primes but my zooms get more use. My other zooms are the 14-24, 24-70, and 70-200 2.8s.
I don't believe you would be disappointed with either the 80-400 or 200-500 but if you really want or need the reach, the 200-500 is a great lens at a reasonable price.
Dec 20, 2023 17:54:44 #
keywest305
Loc: Baltimore Md.
I had the 200-500 before mirrorless. I used it for birding and some sports. It never let me down
Dec 21, 2023 06:22:53 #
I still use the old 80-400 VR lens. I have not used the new version but from what I know those who use it are happy with it. The 200-500 will obviously give you more reach. In a DX body both lenses will perform very well and offer extra reach if that is what you need.
Dec 21, 2023 06:59:18 #
kcj
Loc: Seneca SC
I just got the 80 to 400 and absolutely love it. I use it in the Nikon 850 it is heavy but I can handle it because it is very balanced lens. My friend has the other one a n it is good but way to big for me
Dec 21, 2023 07:38:02 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Groye wrote:
I want to purchase Telephoto lens, I have a 70-200 2.8 just need something a little longer. Looking for some feed back on the Nikon 200-500 and the Nikon 80-400. Thanks
200-500 hands down, it's sharper and has more reach. I used that lens for over 5 years in Florida's wetlands matched with the D5, D500, and D850. Worked great with them all.
Right now that lens is on sale, it is the lowest price I have seen on it.
Do not hesitate, do not go past GO, BUY THE LENS.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1175034-REG/nikon_af_s_nikkor_200_500mm_f_5_6e.html
Dec 21, 2023 07:46:40 #
Dec 21, 2023 08:17:18 #
I have owned both models of the 80-400 (and would today use only the newer version) and have rented the 200-500. Both have advantages and disadvantages. I think the 200-500 was a bit sharper and gave me some more distance - but occasionally a bird would be too close for the 200 end. The 80-400 matched up with what I do somewhat better. In the end, both gave me a lot of enjoyment. And in the end, the quality of the images produced depended more on me than the hardware.
Mike
Mike
Dec 21, 2023 08:46:23 #
DaveyDitzer
Loc: Western PA
Groye wrote:
I want to purchase Telephoto lens, I have a 70-200 2.8 just need something a little longer. Looking for some feed back on the Nikon 200-500 and the Nikon 80-400. Thanks
I agree that the 200-500 is very good lens and relatively affordable; but it's a heavy bugger.
Dec 21, 2023 08:51:39 #
Groye wrote:
I want to purchase Telephoto lens, I have a 70-200 2.8 just need something a little longer. Looking for some feed back on the Nikon 200-500 and the Nikon 80-400. Thanks
I have a couple of comments, but before I put in my nickel's worth, I need to know which camera you plan to mount the lens on.
Dec 21, 2023 08:56:22 #
DaveyDitzer wrote:
I agree that the 200-500 is very good lens and relatively affordable; but it's a heavy bugger.
Agreed, it is heavy but I am 77 and it has yet to become a problem for me.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.