Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Post-Processing Digital Images
New Name For an Old Friend?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Dec 14, 2023 10:58:06   #
terryMc Loc: Arizona's White Mountains
 
I was just notified this morning that there was an update for "Photoshop Camera Raw." Is it now "PCR" instead of "ACR"?

Reply
Dec 14, 2023 11:14:12   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
terryMc wrote:
I was just notified this morning that there was an update for "Photoshop Camera Raw." Is it now "PCR" instead of "ACR"?


RAW adjustments in the Adobe landscape is best done in Lightroom. We've had a few recent UHH threads about the Young, the New, the Future. Adobe too much see there's no growth in PhotoShop, so it's time to fence them off in some back pasture of the property.

Reply
Dec 14, 2023 14:38:47   #
Curmudgeon Loc: SE Arizona
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
RAW adjustments in the Adobe landscape is best done in Lightroom. We've had a few recent UHH threads about the Young, the New, the Future. Adobe too much see there's no growth in PhotoShop, so it's time to fence them off in some back pasture of the property.


I hope you're wrong. I first learned image processing on Photoshop, either Ver. 2 or 3. I do all my processing in Photoshop. I have been told, since I do no processing in LR, I can't say for sure, that everything you can do in LR can be done in PS but not everything you can do in PS can be done in LR. Is that true.

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2023 14:47:25   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Curmudgeon wrote:
I hope you're wrong. I first learned image processing on Photoshop, either Ver. 2 or 3. I do all my processing in Photoshop. I have been told, since I do no processing in LR, I can't say for sure, that everything you can do in LR can be done in PS but not everything you can do in PS can be done in LR. Is that true.


If you can't do it in LR, both faster and easier, who cares ....

Reply
Dec 14, 2023 15:24:37   #
terryMc Loc: Arizona's White Mountains
 
Curmudgeon wrote:
I hope you're wrong. I first learned image processing on Photoshop, either Ver. 2 or 3. I do all my processing in Photoshop. I have been told, since I do no processing in LR, I can't say for sure, that everything you can do in LR can be done in PS but not everything you can do in PS can be done in LR. Is that true.


I started in Photoshop with the first version for Windows, which I believe was 2.5, maybe 1992. I've had this ridiculous Lightroom argument before, and I'm not having it again.

Reply
Dec 14, 2023 17:26:27   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Curmudgeon wrote:
...not everything you can do in PS can be done in LR. Is that true.


PS can use layers and LR can't.

Reply
Dec 14, 2023 18:13:28   #
Curmudgeon Loc: SE Arizona
 
terryMc wrote:
I started in Photoshop with the first version for Windows, which I believe was 2.5, maybe 1992. I've had this ridiculous Lightroom argument before, and I'm not having it again.


Neither am I. I asked a simple question, got a nonsensical answer from a person who pushes LR.

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2023 18:32:07   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Curmudgeon wrote:
Neither am I. I asked a simple question, got a nonsensical answer from a person who pushes LR.


You asked a question. I am the only person who answered that question using quote reply so I assume I am the person who gave a nonsensical answer. It doesn't seem nonsensical to me, nor was it intended to. Since you are not a LR user I pointed out one capability of PS that LR does not share.

It is true that I think LR/PS is the bee's knees and recommend it. However, I recognize that I am not the boss and there exist people with a different interest or orientation than I hold so I allow them full freedom to do their own thing.

Reply
Dec 14, 2023 18:35:40   #
Curmudgeon Loc: SE Arizona
 
DELETED

Reply
Dec 14, 2023 18:36:41   #
Curmudgeon Loc: SE Arizona
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
You asked a question. I am the only person who answered that question using quote reply so I assume I am the person who gave a nonsensical answer. It doesn't seem nonsensical to me, nor was it intended to. Since you are not a LR user I pointed out one capability of PS that LR does not share.

It is true that I think LR/PS is the bee's knees and recommend it. However, I recognize that I am not the boss and there exist people with a different interest or orientation than I hold so I allow them full freedom to do their own thing.
You asked a question. I am the only person who ans... (show quote)


NOPE, I wasn't taking about you. Please read CH_CANONs post and my response to him, not you. I accidently hit the Reply button instead of the Quote Reply button

Reply
Dec 15, 2023 07:30:05   #
Jrhoffman75 Loc: Conway, New Hampshire
 
terryMc wrote:
I was just notified this morning that there was an update for "Photoshop Camera Raw." Is it now "PCR" instead of "ACR"?


I believe Photoshop Camera Raw is the name of the filter in Ps. It has the same features as ACR. ACR is a standalone program.

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2023 09:12:05   #
terryMc Loc: Arizona's White Mountains
 
Jrhoffman75 wrote:
I believe Photoshop Camera Raw is the name of the filter in Ps. It has the same features as ACR. ACR is a standalone program.


I know that the filter version doesn't have all the features of the plug-in (e.g. you can't crop in the filter) but does it have the camera and lens profiles? This update was for new cameras, and I don't see where in the filter you would apply that. I know it applies to the Photoshop and Bridge plug-ins, and these have always been called "Adobe" Camera Raw. Also, I have never seen an update just to the filter that other versions (including Lightroom) didn't get.

None of this is important, they can call it whatever they want. I just thought it was interesting...

Reply
Dec 16, 2023 11:58:20   #
BigDaddy Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
PS can use layers and LR can't.

I don't use LR but layers is requirement for any full blown editor.
If it doesn't do layers then might as well use any simple, free editor, like IfranView or FastStone.
I can't imagine PS w/o layers?
Ease of use is a non-issue imo. All editing has a learning curve, that's at least half the fun.
If LR has any editing functions that PS doesn't, then that might have some significance.

Reply
Dec 16, 2023 12:02:44   #
terryMc Loc: Arizona's White Mountains
 
BigDaddy wrote:

If LR has any editing functions that PS doesn't, then that might have some significance.


If Lr has any editing function that Photoshop doesn't, then it will be available via the Camera Raw filter.

Reply
Dec 16, 2023 15:24:10   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
BigDaddy wrote:
I don't use LR but layers is requirement for any full blown editor.
If it doesn't do layers then might as well use any simple, free editor, like IfranView or FastStone...


LR is NOT a full-blown editor. It is a capable Digital Asset Management tool coupled with a slightly more than basic editor. DAM is its primary strength (my opinion), particularly coupled with the ability to handshake with PS, which I believe fits the definition of a full-blown editor. It is the combination of those two tools that makes it useful to me.

IrfanView and FastStone are really basic editors. Their main weakness (other than lack of layers) is that they are Windows only, not supported by the Apple platform.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Post-Processing Digital Images
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.