Nikon D7000 Compatability issues.
Oct 26, 2011 16:21:56 #
I've had a Nikon D7000 now for about 6 months. I use photoshop CS3 and cannot edit my pic's in the raw format because it doesn't recognise the format. I read that CS4 & 5 can be updated to do so but not CS3. So I ended up downloading Nikons DNG converter to convert my raw files to dng. Just yesterday though I realised when I used my ViewNX2 software that came with the camera just how much the converter is degrading my raw pic's through compression. I can edit my raw with the Nikon software but it doesn't even come close to PS! So that's compatability problem #1 which means that in order to edit in full raw format that I'll have to fork out $500 + for the newest version of PS. Needless to say that sucks. Also, the same problem is associated with the video. I bought from Best Buy their most expensive and up to date video editor of Roxio which said it would edit the format in my camera but lo and behold!! it didn't recognise my cameras video recording format!! I have to say that it's pretty dissappointing when you can't get your camera to do what it's supposed to do without having to update to the most cutting edge, high priced software!! It seems to be the American way these days!!
Oct 26, 2011 17:24:24 #
Such is the dilemma in many trades, whether it's a plumber, auto mechanic or software designer.
I'm assuming you're shooting RAW or else you wouldn't be having the described issues. I've read of this issue in other blogs. Before you drop the bucks to upgrade PS, you might want to get the free download of Nikon's Capture NX2 and play with it. The evaluation period is 30 days, I believe. If you decide to buy it, I think it can be had for $129.00 at various sources.
I hope you find a remedy. I don't do video, so can't help there.
I'm assuming you're shooting RAW or else you wouldn't be having the described issues. I've read of this issue in other blogs. Before you drop the bucks to upgrade PS, you might want to get the free download of Nikon's Capture NX2 and play with it. The evaluation period is 30 days, I believe. If you decide to buy it, I think it can be had for $129.00 at various sources.
I hope you find a remedy. I don't do video, so can't help there.
Oct 26, 2011 17:56:20 #
haze99 wrote:
I've had a Nikon D7000 now for about 6 months. I u... (show quote)
Go to Adobe's website and download the latest Camera RAW software and everything should then work. I have a D7000.
http://www.adobe.com/downloads/
Oct 26, 2011 18:27:20 #
We have gone down this road before..cs3 does not have a raw converter for D7000.. you are right in that you have to upgrade..crazy but true. The only other solution is to get elements 10 for around $80.00 ..bring in your raw files..make your adjustments and then hit go to photoshop from there..otherwise you are stuck with the DNG converter. good luck. The other option would be to get lightroom 3..bring the raw files into lightroom and then move to photoshop but make sure this will work ..call adobe..or talk to someone who has lightroom..and whether its is compatible with CS3
Oct 26, 2011 20:30:25 #
liv2paddle wrote:
We have gone down this road before..cs3 does not h... (show quote)
I'm surprised you don't just call Adobe technical support about the problem. I'm sure they would be happy to help a loyal customer. They provided a free cross-platform full copy of CS% when I switched to an iMac.
Oct 26, 2011 21:22:09 #
Thanks for all the helpful advice. I'll check it out and repost what I find out.
Oct 26, 2011 21:29:42 #
Oct 26, 2011 21:53:04 #
Eugene wrote:
Yet another reason to shoot jpeg.
Eugene? C'mon man! You're joking right? The editing power of shooting in raw is undisputable. If I'm just shooting for fun then jpeg. is just fine. But when I'm doing a wedding or portrait session it's a must to shoot in raw if for no other reason then for the simple fact that you have so much more information to work with in edit mode. Less degradation = higher quality.
Oct 26, 2011 22:05:40 #
Yeah I understand the reasons to shoot in RAW. I have just heard of too many issues with software. I actually just got back from the mountains and I shot in Raw + JPEG. When I downloaded these photos to Elements I could tell a noticble difference between the two files. The jpeg being the better of the two. I really don't enjoy the editing side of photography, I enjoy trying to take photos that don't need a lot of editing. I know that I fall short of that goal more often than not. However, I am open to being convinced that RAW is better.
haze99 wrote:
Eugene? C'mon man! You're joking right? The editing power of shooting in raw is undisputable. If I'm just shooting for fun then jpeg. is just fine. But when I'm doing a wedding or portrait session it's a must to shoot in raw if for no other reason then for the simple fact that you have so much more information to work with in edit mode. Less degradation = higher quality.
Eugene wrote:
Yet another reason to shoot jpeg.
Eugene? C'mon man! You're joking right? The editing power of shooting in raw is undisputable. If I'm just shooting for fun then jpeg. is just fine. But when I'm doing a wedding or portrait session it's a must to shoot in raw if for no other reason then for the simple fact that you have so much more information to work with in edit mode. Less degradation = higher quality.
Oct 26, 2011 22:10:34 #
Outside of a studio environment conditions in the field are seldom perfect. Lighting, weather conditions and background issues cause us to post process. Take away the availability of a stable platform such as a tripod and more issues come to the forefront. I tell students they need to apply as much time to learning post processing techniques as they to to studying the art of photography.
Oct 26, 2011 22:16:03 #
Hey Bob. If that was directed to me, I do appreciate your comment. I had sun, misting rain, wind and snow this weekend.
Wasn't trying to hijack the origional post.
Wasn't trying to hijack the origional post.
bobmielke wrote:
Outside of a studio environment conditions in the field are seldom perfect. Lighting, weather conditions and background issues cause us to post process. Take away the availability of a stable platform such as a tripod and more issues come to the forefront. I tell students they need to apply as much time to learning post processing techniques as they to to studying the art of photography.
Oct 26, 2011 22:26:36 #
Eugene wrote:
Hey Bob. If that was directed to me, I do apprecia... (show quote)
I can't count the number of frames I've fired off in 42 years of shooting. Personally, I hate bright sunlight with a clear sky. I think I'm a vampire in those conditions. Give me a good old overcast day anyday and I can be very creative. I live in the Pacific Northwest where it rains 9 months out of the year. Nirvana! LOL
Oct 26, 2011 22:33:43 #
Bob. I have sent you a PM as not to sidetrack this thread. I hope this is O.K.
bobmielke wrote:
quote=Eugene Hey Bob. If that was directed to me,... (show quote)
Oct 26, 2011 22:38:03 #
Eugene wrote:
Bob. I have sent you a PM as not to sidetrack this... (show quote)
Of couse it's ok. I have over 200 PMs on file since joining this forum. Glad to answer any questions.
Oct 26, 2011 23:13:34 #
bobmielke wrote:
quote=Eugene Bob. I have sent you a PM as not to ... (show quote)
What exactly is a "PM"?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.