thom w wrote:
Most sources I have checked define "sexual relations" as coitus, something he was never accused of. I did say most, I did not say all. There are always outliers. The very second I heard that, I said, out loud actually, he got a BJ. Be incensed if you wish, but there is no evidence it was a lie. I think, knowing he had Ken Starr up his butt, it was unbelievably foolish, it hardly seemed something one should me impeached for. Depending on their agreements he may very well have c***ted on Hillary. He didn't c***t on you or I. Had he said "I did not have sex with that woman" I would have believed him at the time and later would have agreed he lied. I doubt I would have changed my opinion on the rest of it.
Most sources I have checked define "sexual re... (
show quote)
The problem little princess is Clinton LIED about the blow job. Had he simply said he received a blow job under his desk OR he put a cigar up the young lady's vagina, he would have been thought to be nothing more than the skirt chasing POS we all know him to be. Oh yes, he c***ted on his wife, Hillary, too. I agree the blow job and c***ting on his wife do not rate impeachment. Lying DOES.
But with the Left, lying seems more honest than telling the t***h. It comes more naturally to lie.
I do love how you waffle your way through your post though. Typical princess behavior.