More FJB Stupidity: I***t in chief, FJB, is saying that a 2 state solution is needed and implying that Israel is at fault along with the democrats following suit showing stupidity.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

I***t in chief, FJB, is saying that a 2 state solution is needed and implying that Israel is at fault along with the democrats following suit showing stupidity.
Their rejection goes back to 1919. Their current demand is ocean to river which is the utter destruction of Israel.
Rejections of the 2 state solution has been rejected by Palestinians through the 40s, 50s to the present.
FJB is such an i***t.

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

Architect1776 wrote:

I***t in chief, FJB, is saying that a 2 state solution is needed and implying that Israel is at fault along with the democrats following suit showing stupidity.
Their rejection goes back to 1919. Their current demand is ocean to river which is the utter destruction of Israel.
Rejections of the 2 state solution has been rejected by Palestinians through the 40s, 50s to the present.
FJB is such an i***t.

Did you get this from Fox news?

Watash

Architect1776 wrote:

I***t in chief, FJB, is saying that a 2 state solution is needed and implying that Israel is at fault along with the democrats following suit showing stupidity.
Their rejection goes back to 1919. Their current demand is ocean to river which is the utter destruction of Israel.
Rejections of the 2 state solution has been rejected by Palestinians through the 40s, 50s to the present.
FJB is such an i***t.

2 state solution was offered to Yassar Arafat and he rejected it. They want a one-state solution and that is
Israelis and Israel wiped off the face of the earth. They are uncivilized animals. However, the bible said
they would be a "wild" people.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Kraken wrote:

Did you get this from Fox news?

MSNBC

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

Architect1776 wrote:

MSNBC

Far left bull-$hit.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Kraken wrote:

Far left bull-$hit.

It was live on TV.
Doesn't matter who is broadcasting it was real time for the i***t.
The rest is well documented history with dozens of references in Google.
Something that you have a super hard time using.

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

Architect1776 wrote:

It was live on TV.
Doesn't matter who is broadcasting it was real time for the i***t.
The rest is well documented history with dozens of references in Google.
Something that you have a super hard time using.

Then it probably would have been on center bias

news outlets also so why not just go there first?

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Kraken wrote:

Then it probably would have been on center bias

news outlets also so why not just go there first?

Because it is far better to watch the i***t live so one doesn't have to listen to the interpretation bias of even stupider f**e news that gave us the Russia Russia h**x and more recently the J6 lies that have now been shown to be f**e news lies as a result of the actual video tapes. And now lawsuits will be overwhelming the DOJ the committee.

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

Architect1776 wrote:

Because it is far better to watch the i***t live so one doesn't have to listen to the interpretation bias of even stupider f**e news that gave us the Russia Russia h**x and more recently the J6 lies that have now been shown to be f**e news lies as a result of the actual video tapes. And now lawsuits will be overwhelming the DOJ the committee.

So what you are saying is that you only want to hear what

makes you happy and to hell with t***h and facts. Got it.

SteveR Loc: Michigan

Here's a quick history from Britannica, which I assume we all can accept as accurate. The significant part of this history is the UN Resolution in 1947 which did propose two states in Palestine. One Arab and one Jewish. The Jews accepted it but the Arabs rejected it and thus we have the situation that we have today after several wars in the meantime in which Israel gained the territory it now has and the Arabs/Palestinians lost it.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/two-state-solution

SteveR Loc: Michigan

Here's a quick history from Britannica, which I assume we all can accept as accurate. The significant part of this history is the UN Resolution in 1947 which did propose two states in Palestine. One Arab and one Jewish. The Arabs rejected it and thus we have the situation that we have today after several wars in the meantime in which Israel gained the territory it now has and the Arabs/Palestinians lost it but want it back. All of it.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/two-state-solution

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Architect1776 wrote:

I***t in chief, FJB, is saying that a 2 state solution is needed and implying that Israel is at fault along with the democrats following suit showing stupidity.
Their rejection goes back to 1919. Their current demand is ocean to river which is the utter destruction of Israel.
Rejections of the 2 state solution has been rejected by Palestinians through the 40s, 50s to the present.
FJB is such an i***t.

While all may argue on the two state border it is not true that Palestinians have rejected the idea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_solution

Retired CPO Loc: Travel full time in an RV

DennyT wrote:

While all may argue on the two state border it is not true that Palestinians have rejected the idea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_solution

Bull $hit! They have rejected it multiple times. As said earlier, they are animals. "From the River to the Sea" should refer to the Palestinians, NOT the Israelis!