Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
3D - Studio Pose in Color NSFW
Nov 23, 2023 11:07:13 #
3D conversion by SHG.
Photo Credit: Saulius Roza.
3D glasses are required to view it in 3D.
Photo Credit: Saulius Roza.
3D glasses are required to view it in 3D.
Nov 23, 2023 13:30:15 #
SoHillGuy wrote:
3D conversion by SHG.
Photo Credit: Saulius Roza.
3D glasses are required to view it in 3D.
Photo Credit: Saulius Roza.
3D glasses are required to view it in 3D.
I don't have 3D glasses but I still love this image. Classic!
Paul
Nov 23, 2023 13:32:35 #
PaulW128 wrote:
I don't have 3D glasses but I still love this image. Classic!
Paul
Paul
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Nov 23, 2023 14:16:28 #
Shooter41
Loc: Wichita, KS
SoHillGuy wrote:
3D conversion by SHG.
Photo Credit: Saulius Roza.
3D glasses are required to view it in 3D.
Photo Credit: Saulius Roza.
3D glasses are required to view it in 3D.
Dear SoHillGuy...
Not only is your model extremely beautiful, but her choice of pose accentuates her femineity and exquisite figure. Well done image, Sir. Shooter41
Nov 23, 2023 15:25:02 #
Shooter41 wrote:
Dear SoHillGuy...
Not only is your model extremely beautiful, but her choice of pose accentuates her femineity and exquisite figure. Well done image, Sir. Shooter41
Not only is your model extremely beautiful, but her choice of pose accentuates her femineity and exquisite figure. Well done image, Sir. Shooter41
***
Thank you for the comment.
Nov 23, 2023 15:50:53 #
mjc925
Loc: SF Bay Area
Luckily I have the glasses and it is a really nicely composed and lit shot of a very nice model.
Nov 23, 2023 15:54:53 #
When I view this image with the glasses I find the shadow line along her spine to be a bit strong. From the waist up it appears there are 2 torsos... hers looking down at the pedestal, and another behind her creating the left arm and almost facing the back wall. I don't see the two "backs" as being in the same plane so as to be on the same body. I wonder if this is an artefact of the 3D rendering, or if the original photo also gives me that slight confusion, in which case it is the pose and lightning.
Otherwise a great shot and nice 3D effect.
Otherwise a great shot and nice 3D effect.
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Nov 23, 2023 16:33:34 #
mjc925 wrote:
Luckily I have the glasses and it is a really nicely composed and lit shot of a very nice model.
***
Thanks for viewing.
Nov 23, 2023 16:39:29 #
JohnFrim wrote:
When I view this image with the glasses I find the... (show quote)
***
I had not noticed "two backs" until you brought my attention to it, Now I see it all the time while viewing.
I am posting the photographer's original 2D for your viewing.
Nov 23, 2023 19:57:26 #
SoHillGuy wrote:
***
I had not noticed "two backs" until you brought my attention to it, Now I see it all the time while viewing.
I am posting the photographer's original 2D for your viewing.
I had not noticed "two backs" until you brought my attention to it, Now I see it all the time while viewing.
I am posting the photographer's original 2D for your viewing.
Thanks for that.
The effect is definitely there in the original. I really have to work at it being one torso!
Nov 24, 2023 02:54:11 #
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Nov 24, 2023 08:06:08 #
Shooter41
Loc: Wichita, KS
SoHillGuy wrote:
***
Thanks for viewing.
Thanks for viewing.
Dear SoHillGuy...
This image you created breaks all the rules and yet is magnificent. We can't see her face. We can't see her eyes. We can only see her gorgeous, feminine body and breath-takingly, perfect buttocks. Your and her willingness to go against the norm and follow your personal judgement has resulted in a masterpiece. Congratulations to you as well as your model. Is there the slightest chance that we might see the face and eyes of such a rare and delightful example of pure beauty and yet not insult her privacy? (Just photographing a headshot of her like movie stars use to promote their work and identifying her as the model for the gorgeous back shot would be sufficient.) Shooter41
Nov 24, 2023 08:17:11 #
Shooter41 wrote:
Dear SoHillGuy... br This image you created breaks... (show quote)
The OP didn't take the photo, he just did the 3D conversion on someone else's photo.
Nov 24, 2023 09:14:24 #
Nov 24, 2023 09:58:58 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.