I read there might be a version II of the Canon RF 24-70 f2.8 & the version II of the RF 70-200 F2.8. Is there any other info on this rumor or release date? I am thinking of upgrading both from EF F4 models. I do not want to upgrade to RF F2.8 versions if RF II 2.8 is coming out.
If too expensive I will stay with what I have.
Thanks,
Jim
The vII of the 70-200 will return to the internal zoom design, like all the EF versions. I haven't heard of an update for the RF 24-70. The majority of the RF lens rumors focus on lots of wide angle prime options in 2024, rather than more zoom lenses.
CHG_CANON wrote:
The vII of the 70-200 will return to the internal zoom design, like all the EF versions. I haven't heard of an update for the RF 24-70. The majority of the RF lens rumors focus on lots of wide angle prime options in 2024, rather than more zoom lenses.
Thanks Paul. I prefer the internal zoom.
CHG_CANON wrote:
The vII of the 70-200 will return to the internal zoom design, like all the EF versions. I haven't heard of an update for the RF 24-70. The majority of the RF lens rumors focus on lots of wide angle prime options in 2024, rather than more zoom lenses.
There is a 24-120 f2.8 on the horizon - to be released mid-December.
It's a 24-105 2.8. not 120. It's available for preorder now so you can find all the specs at B&H and other outlets. An internal zoom 70-200 is rumored, no specs yet. I think it is likely to have some of the features as the 24-105 like being able to use a motor for zooming and an external aperture adjustment ring. I'm sure it will be heavier than the current 70-200 2.8 and will likely be sold in addition to rather than a replacement for the current model. I think it is highly unlikely a new version of the 24-70 is coming. There hasn't been any hint of one on the rumor sites. I think you can expect a ten year life span for the current model. Perhaps a 24-70 4L will come someday.
I replaced my EF 24-70 2.8 II a few months ago when the RF version went on sale for 1799. The EF version was widely regarded as one of the best zooms ever made. I used mine heavily for many years. The RF version offers little IQ improvement but you do get IS and better tracking which is important for video and low light conditions. Subjectively, the images are as beautiful as the EF version but I sense they have more of a 3D look if that makes sense. Of course, this is impossible to quantify. I also enjoy the shorter MFD and greater magnification.
There are some reviews comparing with the 70-200 4L with the 2.8L you may want to check out. I've had the 4L myself for 16 months and found it a real joy to use. The light weight and short length are real advantages for carrying long distances. I use it a lot more than I used the EF versions.
MountainDave wrote:
It's a 24-105 2.8. not 120. It's available for preorder now so you can find all the specs at B&H and other outlets. An internal zoom 70-200 is rumored, no specs yet. I think it is likely to have some of the features as the 24-105 like being able to use a motor for zooming and an external aperture adjustment ring. I'm sure it will be heavier than the current 70-200 2.8 and will likely be sold in addition to rather than a replacement for the current model. I think it is highly unlikely a new version of the 24-70 is coming. There hasn't been any hint of one on the rumor sites. I think you can expect a ten year life span for the current model. Perhaps a 24-70 4L will come someday.
I replaced my EF 24-70 2.8 II a few months ago when the RF version went on sale for 1799. The EF version was widely regarded as one of the best zooms ever made. I used mine heavily for many years. The RF version offers little IQ improvement but you do get IS and better tracking which is important for video and low light conditions. Subjectively, the images are as beautiful as the EF version but I sense they have more of a 3D look if that makes sense. Of course, this is impossible to quantify. I also enjoy the shorter MFD and greater magnification.
There are some reviews comparing with the 70-200 4L with the 2.8L you may want to check out. I've had the 4L myself for 16 months and found it a real joy to use. The light weight and short length are real advantages for carrying long distances. I use it a lot more than I used the EF versions.
It's a 24-105 2.8. not 120. It's available for pre... (
show quote)
Yep, unless there’s a compelling reason for a version II then I wouldn’t expect to see one if there are still other lenses on the roadmap.
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Yep, unless there’s a compelling reason for a version II then I wouldn’t expect to see one if there are still other lenses on the roadmap.
I do think the internal zoom is better and welcome the change. Canon is listening to its consumers 👍
junglejim1949 wrote:
I do think the internal zoom is better and welcome the change. Canon is listening to its consumers 👍
Yep. Internal zoom is a good reason.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.