JohnSwanda wrote:
There's no rule saying photography must reflect "reality".
AAMOF its really critical to always keep in mind that its not expected to.
Longshadow wrote:
Ahhhhh, no.
A computer program algorithm is used..........
Same with navigation devices.
And every time you take a step a learned muscle response is used. Still has intelligence (real this time) controlling it.
Longshadow wrote:
He just joined, first post.
How to make a reeeeally poor first impression. Its not simply his first post, its his first *day*. But, to be fair, he is hardly the very first bozo to immediately post something sooper stoopid rather than silently scoping out the terrain for a good looooooong while first.
cahale wrote:
And every time you take a step a learned muscle response is used. Still has intelligence (real this time) controlling it.
Are you the
artificial "intelligence" then?
The camera surely doesn't have it.
I myself have natural intelligence.
E.L., I really love your reply to the question. I am new to this forum and based on the previous discussion (before yours) I was ready to bow out and quit the forum. I get a lot of the BS, like the previous comments and it really discusts me. I love open discussion on any topic and I do know that AI can be boring to some but I see it as the real future of everything. I believe it's success or failure will ultimately be determined by the client(s) responses to the product and the results it generates. As a commercial/professional photographer success or failure will depend on the clients response. AI can be recognized by the keen eye which will reflect the photographer's reputation. The average person viewing a photo will never see the edits (unless it is so bad) and it will produce the ohoooos and ahaaaas that usually come from the viewer. Anyway, E.L. I really do appreciate your honesty and accuracy in your response rather than the rubbish from the other contributors. Thanks again and I might stay here for a while because there are some people still here that appreciate real discussion. I just wish that those that don't like a topic or are tired of a topic would just leave the conversation rather than destroy it.
BebuLamar wrote:
When I started I thought I could take a photograph and it would look like what I saw. I learned that is impossible. I can make the photograph looks in many different ways but never like what I saw in reality. That is actually the most important thing I learned about photography.
Thaz all there is to it. Theres nothing more that one needs to learn about photography.
And your point is?????????????????????????
bnnsradio wrote:
E.L., I really love your reply to the question. I am new to this forum and based on the previous discussion (before yours) I was ready to bow out and quit the forum. I get a lot of the BS, like the previous comments and it really discusts me. I love open discussion on any topic and I do know that AI can be boring to some but I see it as the real future of everything. I believe it's success or failure will ultimately be determined by the client(s) responses to the product and the results it generates. As a commercial/professional photographer success or failure will depend on the clients response. AI can be recognized by the keen eye which will reflect the photographer's reputation. The average person viewing a photo will never see the edits (unless it is so bad) and it will produce the ohoooos and ahaaaas that usually come from the viewer. Anyway, E.L. I really do appreciate your honesty and accuracy in your response rather than the rubbish from the other contributors. Thanks again and I might stay here for a while because there are some people still here that appreciate real discussion. I just wish that those that don't like a topic or are tired of a topic would just leave the conversation rather than destroy it.
E.L., I really love your reply to the question. I ... (
show quote)
I think a more specific question might have gotten a better response. AI in photography takes many forms, from sharpening or noise reduction to adding computer generated imagery to photographs. What type of AI are you using about?
Longshadow wrote:
Who you asking?
And who really needs to know ?
John, It was meant to be a general question. AI is being added to most editing software and my experience from many photographers is some love it and some hate it. I am still on the fence about it so I was just looking for some more input.
I had Special K with strawberries and blueberries for breakfast, then several prunes afterwards because I’m old.
User ID wrote:
Who needs to know ?
The person to whom he replied.....
How else can he receive a response?
Longshadow wrote:
The person to whom he replied.....
How else can he receive a response?
I promise I will NOT mention my breakfast.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.