Architect1776 wrote:
Why not use the Nikon 200-600mm which is infinitely more useful and as sharp?
Same max aperture as the fixed 600mm and from testing published sharpness is the same.
So between the 2 why waste money on a one size lens vs a lens with far more versatility.
PS, IS on a 135mm is a Godsend, especially when it is relatively heavy.
You mean 180-600mm, which I have and use. Yes, Nikon has more than one handhold-able option to get to 600mm.