Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
AF-S Nikkor 24-85 1:3.5-4.5 G ED VR VS. Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED IF VR Autofocus APS-C Lens
Sep 24, 2023 11:46:30   #
bobburk3 Loc: Maryland
 
I have the Nikkor 24-85 and can't seem to get it calibrated to my D7200 to give sharp pictures. Thinking of replacing it with the Nikkor 16-85 f/3.5-5.6. Any thoughts? I have read that the 16-85 is a very sharp lens.

Reply
Sep 24, 2023 11:58:24   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
bobburk3 wrote:
...I have read that the 16-85 is a very sharp lens.


It's sharp, has good contrast, fringing is almost non-existent and it has a very good focal range. For quite a long time it was my only lens.
.


(Download)

Reply
Sep 24, 2023 14:17:28   #
GLSmith Loc: Tampa, Fl
 
Consider the Nikon 18-300

Reply
 
 
Sep 24, 2023 15:00:32   #
61jhawk Loc: Tarrant County, Texas
 
bobburk3 wrote:
I have the Nikkor 24-85 and can't seem to get it calibrated to my D7200 to give sharp pictures. Thinking of replacing it with the Nikkor 16-85 f/3.5-5.6. Any thoughts? I have read that the 16-85 is a very sharp lens.


I had the 16-85 and wore it out over a good many years. I don't think Nikon makes it anymore. I replaced it with a Nikkor 16-80 which has worked out well for me for a walking around lens when I don't need a longer lens.

Reply
Sep 24, 2023 15:38:39   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
bobburk3 wrote:
I have the Nikkor 24-85 and can't seem to get it calibrated to my D7200 to give sharp pictures. Thinking of replacing it with the Nikkor 16-85 f/3.5-5.6. Any thoughts? I have read that the 16-85 is a very sharp lens.


The current model is the 16-80 f/2.8-4. I looked at this lens a couple of years ago, but didn't buy it because it seemed too expensive at $1100 for a lens that is f/4 past about 28mm. Even used ones were selling for about $900 at that time. (But be aware that this is pretty much a minority opinion. Tons of folks have and love that lens.) I ended up buying a very nice used 24-120mm f/4 full frame lens instead for $425.

If you are ok with 24mm at the wide end (since you have the 24-85), that might be something to consider. I am confident that you could buy both the 24-120 and a brand new 10-20mm DX wide angle for less than the 16-80 if you are wanting to add a wider view.

Reply
Sep 24, 2023 15:57:34   #
Paul LaFontaine
 
The 16-85 is the lens most frequently found on my 7200. I love it.

Reply
Sep 24, 2023 16:30:35   #
nervous2 Loc: Provo, Utah
 
Paul LaFontaine wrote:
The 16-85 is the lens most frequently found on my 7200. I love it.


Me too.

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2023 06:45:15   #
Orphoto Loc: Oregon
 
I use that same 24-85 on my d850 when i need the convenience of a zoom. My copy works extremely well. There are lots of reasons why photos ars not sharp. One of which is that a lens is not performing well. Try a series of shots in controlled setting, using a tripod, careful technique and manual focus, including live view. It may be that autofocus calibration is the culprit and that only a change in lenses (or a repair) is the answer.

Ever hear golfers insist that all their problems were the club's fault?

Reply
Sep 25, 2023 12:55:21   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
bobburk3, have you contacted Nikon? I do not have the 16-85 but I use the 24-85 often and I am very pleased with it. The 24-85 was made for use with a FX camera (full frame) while the 16-85 was specifically made for use with the DX format. For your D7200 the 16-85 will give you a better wide angle if that is important to you. The 24-85 can be used with a DX camera but while you gain on the tele side you lose wide angle capabilities.

Reply
Sep 25, 2023 23:26:14   #
ChristianHJensen
 
bobburk3 wrote:
I have the Nikkor 24-85 and can't seem to get it calibrated to my D7200 to give sharp pictures. Thinking of replacing it with the Nikkor 16-85 f/3.5-5.6. Any thoughts? I have read that the 16-85 is a very sharp lens.


The 16-80 f/2.8-4 is a good deal better. Sure it is expensive but you can find a fair amount of used ones floating around as it was used as a kit lens on the D500 OA

Reply
Sep 25, 2023 23:49:06   #
Boris77
 
bobburk3 wrote:
I have the Nikkor 24-85 and can't seem to get it calibrated to my D7200 to give sharp pictures. Thinking of replacing it with the Nikkor 16-85 f/3.5-5.6. Any thoughts? I have read that the 16-85 is a very sharp lens.


Viva the Nikon 16-85. One of the first lens I bought when I settled in with Nikon (pre2010?). Still working well but I like it so much I bought a second for back up. Sharp enough, but I was not aware it could be calibrated on these old cameras (D7100, D7200).
Boris

Reply
 
 
Sep 26, 2023 15:04:23   #
Spirit Vision Photography Loc: Behind a Camera.
 
bobburk3 wrote:
I have the Nikkor 24-85 and can't seem to get it calibrated to my D7200 to give sharp pictures. Thinking of replacing it with the Nikkor 16-85 f/3.5-5.6. Any thoughts? I have read that the 16-85 is a very sharp lens.



The 16-85 glass is quite good. I was very satisfied with mine. However, I gave it away attached to a crop sensor camera. You"ll like it.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.