Trump Beats Biden In Landslide
Sep 18, 2023 14:53:38 #
Fire away. Make of it what you will. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger.
https://dcenquirer.com/new-reuters-poll-has-trump-winning-2024-rematch-against-biden-in-e*******l-landslide-307-to-226
https://dcenquirer.com/new-reuters-poll-has-trump-winning-2024-rematch-against-biden-in-e*******l-landslide-307-to-226
Sep 18, 2023 15:22:30 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:
Fire away. Make of it what you will. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger.
https://dcenquirer.com/new-reuters-poll-has-trump-winning-2024-rematch-against-biden-in-e*******l-landslide-307-to-226
https://dcenquirer.com/new-reuters-poll-has-trump-winning-2024-rematch-against-biden-in-e*******l-landslide-307-to-226
Trump may have just fixed that problem. We'll see.
https://news.yahoo.com/entertainment/trump-warns-cognitively-impaired-biden-172337832.html
Sep 18, 2023 16:17:20 #
The poll is meaningless. If polls taken more than a year before an e******n including an incumbent President accurately predicted e******n results, we would have had President Romney and President Kerry. The only poll that matters is on e******n day.
Sep 18, 2023 17:18:53 #
thom w wrote:
Trump may have just fixed that problem. We'll see.
https://news.yahoo.com/entertainment/trump-warns-cognitively-impaired-biden-172337832.html
https://news.yahoo.com/entertainment/trump-warns-cognitively-impaired-biden-172337832.html
Gotta long way to go to catch up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zg25440ledA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE78RzAJJnA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtYyfyr6Q-E&t=4s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gj-dEXVfc5w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbE2SmV2bs
Sep 18, 2023 17:19:56 #
National Park wrote:
The poll is meaningless. If polls taken more than a year before an e******n including an incumbent President accurately predicted e******n results, we would have had President Romney and President Kerry. The only poll that matters is on e******n day.
True dat. But you wouldn't be saying that if it favored Biden now would you?
Sep 18, 2023 20:31:55 #
[quote=The Aardvark Is Ready]
Dcenquirer rated by Media Bias: Overall, we rate the DC Enquirer Right Biased based on consistent story se******n and editorializing that favors a conservative pro-Trump perspective. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the one-sided promotion of propaganda and the occasional use of poor sources which fail fact checks.
That aside, Trump by then could be in the clink with hopefully H****r B***n in a nearby cell; Biden could be in an old age home specializing in dementia possibly having Senators Grossly and Feinstein as neighbors.
Too far out, time will tell how the tragedy/comedy plays out.
Dcenquirer rated by Media Bias: Overall, we rate the DC Enquirer Right Biased based on consistent story se******n and editorializing that favors a conservative pro-Trump perspective. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the one-sided promotion of propaganda and the occasional use of poor sources which fail fact checks.
That aside, Trump by then could be in the clink with hopefully H****r B***n in a nearby cell; Biden could be in an old age home specializing in dementia possibly having Senators Grossly and Feinstein as neighbors.
Too far out, time will tell how the tragedy/comedy plays out.
Sep 18, 2023 20:41:37 #
[quote=rwoodvira]
Uh, pardon me. It's a reuter's poll, not a DC Inquirer one. Besides who in the hell rates the Fact checkers and raters?
The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:
br br Dcenquirer rated by Media Bias: Overall, w... (show quote)
Uh, pardon me. It's a reuter's poll, not a DC Inquirer one. Besides who in the hell rates the Fact checkers and raters?
Sep 18, 2023 21:01:35 #
Weird thing is I couldn't find anything on the reuters site. There is something on the YouTube site.
Sep 18, 2023 21:21:42 #
rwoodvira wrote:
Weird thing is I couldn't find anything on the reuters site. There is something on the YouTube site.
I never checked reuters. I guess I just wrongly assumed that no one would be stupid enough to make up a poll and put reuters name on it.
Sep 18, 2023 21:56:09 #
As AI's get more involved, I think both the left and right sources all have to be checked.
I think that if I started a news source advising I had located the lost writings of Nostradamus who advised a s**tty woman from the mountainous west will run against a former purveyor of coffee to rule the kingdom it might be believed. But the kicker is the OPrey will run as well, win and everyone will get a car someone would believe it.
I think that if I started a news source advising I had located the lost writings of Nostradamus who advised a s**tty woman from the mountainous west will run against a former purveyor of coffee to rule the kingdom it might be believed. But the kicker is the OPrey will run as well, win and everyone will get a car someone would believe it.
Sep 19, 2023 09:04:12 #
The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:
I never checked reuters. I guess I just wrongly assumed that no one would be stupid enough to make up a poll and put reuters name on it.
Looks like it's a Harvard/CAPS-Harris poll that was released on Monday.
https://harvardharrispoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/HHP_Sept23_KeyResults.pdf
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.