Another potential image from the series, an implied nude portrait in keeping with that 50’s era.
I’m trying for sensitivity and playfulness here, rather than a more explicit, erotic art image. Hopefully no-one will be offended by this.
Not offended at all. You did a great job here, and she is an attractive woman to be sure. I like that she is not rail-thin.
gshearron wrote:
Not offended at all. You did a great job here, and she is an attractive woman to be sure. I like that she is not rail-thin.
I agree, I like the expression on her face too.
Bruce
Yes, in the 1950s, only implied was allowed, then things changed bit by bit... Playboy magazine became very popular but must be behind the counter out of reach. Things became more wild and in 1988 Hustler magazines focused on genitalia ... then ... conservative religion had its toes stepped on:
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988),
https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/hustler-magazine-v-falwell-1988/
Reminiscent of the Varga (Esquire magazine)/Vargas (Playboy) girl, named for the Peruvian-born artist Alberto Vargas, who said he learned from producer Florenz "Flo" Ziegfield the difference between "nudes and lewds." Years ago, I did a paper on Vargas, whose worked adorned fuselages of aircraft during WWII and whose pinups were "treasures" to GIs in the trenches.
Nothing nude or lewd in your photograph, in my opinion. Well done!
dpullum wrote:
Yes, in the 1950s, only implied was allowed, then things changed bit by bit... Playboy magazine became very popular but must be behind the counter out of reach. Things became more wild and in 1988 Hustler magazines focused on genitalia ... then ... conservative religion had its toes stepped on:
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988),
https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/hustler-magazine-v-falwell-1988/Interesting read. I had nearly forgotten about that case. Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing!
fldiverman wrote:
Interesting read. I had nearly forgotten about that case. Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing!
Me too, I do remember it and yes, we need freedom of speech.
Bruce
Excellent…cute, nice expression, no tattoos…what's not to like. My only observation is that she's obviously got thigh high stockings on and the color almost exactly matches her actual skin tone…nothing wrong with that but personally I would have preferred either slightly lighter or darker to make them more obvious…I'm sort of amazed how closely they match.
LDB415
Loc: Houston south suburb
What a great photo and beautiful young lady. I hope we see more of her.
fldiverman wrote:
Interesting read. I had nearly forgotten about that case. Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing!
Yes it is. There would be nothing but boring stand up comedy without free speech.
Stan
LDB415 wrote:
What a great photo and beautiful young lady. I hope we see more of her.
Thanks! Here’s the first I published in this set:
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-783085-1.htmlI have several more “Nearlies from the Series”, so I will sort through them and maybe publish one or two more here.
The Series runs from 50’s Cheesecake through Art Nude to Erotica… those of course won’t be submitted to any Public Forum, they will be Private Collection only.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.