Potential 6 Jan charges against trump…: 1.conspiracy to defraud the United States,” which basically means attempting to interfere with government functions by dishonest means.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

1.conspiracy to defraud the United States,” which basically means attempting to interfere with government functions by dishonest means.

2.obstructing federal proceedings.

3. conspiracy to deprive people of their constitutional rights, including the right to v**e and have their v**es counted.

No charge on i**********n or r**ting

https://news.yahoo.com/column-jack-smith-narrows-possible-110000600.html

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Sounds appropriate despite the left/right rhetoric.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

More on the subject.
Next year will be interesting . I believe Unlike civil trials the defendant must be present in criminal trials .
Instead of musical chairs it could be musical trials .

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-january-6-federal-indictment-what-we-know-updates.html

And still to come

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fulton-county-georgia-grand-jury-donald-trump-potential-indictment/

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

DaveO wrote:

Sounds appropriate despite the left/right rhetoric.

Will not end in a conviction... There is no meat on that bone.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

DennyT wrote:

More on the subject.
Next year will be interesting . I believe Unlike civil trials the defendant must be present in criminal trials .
Instead of musical chairs it could be musical trials .

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-january-6-federal-indictment-what-we-know-updates.html

And still to come

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fulton-county-georgia-grand-jury-donald-trump-potential-indictment/

Betcha that gives you a woodie.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Blurryeyed wrote:

Betcha that gives you a woodie.

You have become. Very nasty person lately . Are you’re proud of your behavior ?

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Blurryeyed wrote:

Will not end in a conviction... There is no meat on that bone.

I would suggest that the allegations should be adjudicated and let the results speak for themselves.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

DennyT wrote:

You have become. Very nasty person lately . Are you’re proud of your behavior ?

BboH Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD

I think the quote goes something like this - show me the man I'll find the law he broke.

rcarol

Blurryeyed wrote:

Will not end in a conviction... There is no meat on that bone.

As one commentator stated, with enough indictments at least one jury can be found to get a conviction,

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

DennyT wrote:

1.conspiracy to defraud the United States,” which basically means attempting to interfere with government functions by dishonest means.

2.obstructing federal proceedings.

3. conspiracy to deprive people of their constitutional rights, including the right to v**e and have their v**es counted.

No charge on i**********n or r**ting

https://news.yahoo.com/column-jack-smith-narrows-possible-110000600.html

Why is every “unsubstantiated” evidence against Trump is substantiated but every “unsubstantiated” evidence against Biden’s is still unsubstantiated with you? Dude, you are such a fraud.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Racmanaz wrote:

Why is every “unsubstantiated” evidence against Trump is substantiated but every “unsubstantiated” evidence against Biden’s is still unsubstantiated with you? Dude, you are such a fraud.

What in my post ( the one you quoted ) talks or mentions “unsubstantiated evidence”

In fact the very title starts with the word “ potential “.

Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.

DennyT wrote:

More on the subject.
Next year will be interesting . I believe Unlike civil trials the defendant must be present in criminal trials .
Instead of musical chairs it could be musical trials .

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-january-6-federal-indictment-what-we-know-updates.html

And still to come

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fulton-county-georgia-grand-jury-donald-trump-potential-indictment/

Courts have ruled generally that a defendant must be present but can be tried in absentia in certain cases like the defendant skips out mid trial. Although this is the rule I don’t believe there is any constitutional prohibition against a trial in absentia.

gorgehiker Loc: Lexington, Ky

Racmanaz wrote:

Why is every “unsubstantiated” evidence against Trump is substantiated but every “unsubstantiated” evidence against Biden’s is still unsubstantiated with you? Dude, you are such a fraud.

Could be because much of the evidence against Trump came from his own big mouth...

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

DennyT wrote:

What in my post ( the one you quoted ) talks or mentions “unsubstantiated evidence”

In fact the very title starts with the word “ potential “.

Because obviously, you think it’s substantiated because you didn’t post unsubstantiated like you always do with a Biden posts you fraud