Panasonic releases the Lumix S5 Mark IIX
May 13, 2023 14:31:57 #
burkphoto wrote:
Both S5 II and IIX have cooling fans to allow very high bit rate video. They don’t overheat.
He is always the problem. They been making processors more efficient. There are limits and there’s only so much forced air can do. I seem to remember reading about sodium filled pushrods in World War II radial engines. They were used to help conduct heat from the inside to the outside, which was a big problem with those big radial engines.
May 13, 2023 15:34:54 #
Hip Coyote wrote:
Speaking of color, I do not care for the bright co... (show quote)
I have never been hiking with a blazing sun ooking my camera cuz I never "wear" a camera ... its in the bag until Im about to actually use it.
May 13, 2023 15:46:30 #
JD750 wrote:
He is always the problem. They been making processors more efficient. There are limits and there’s only so much forced air can do. I seem to remember reading about sodium filled pushrods in World War II radial engines. They were used to help conduct heat from the inside to the outside, which was a big problem with those big radial engines.
Panasonic has long had the best heat mitigation systems. I have a GH4 that I've used in 95°F and direct sun for hours, without overheating. I only had to stop to change memory cards and batteries. Part of the reason was that Micro 4/3 chips are 1/4 the area of full frame and about half the area of APS-C. There just wasn't that much heat to dissipate.
The GH6, S5 II, S5 IIX, and S1H all have fans, so they can really crank the bit rates on video files.
The full frame S5 IIX can do Apple ProRes / 59.94Hz / [5.8K] 5776x3056 (17:9) 29.97p, 1.9Gbps (ProRes 422 HQ) / 1.3Gbps (ProRes 422) when connected to a fast, external USB SSD. The camera may stop itself to cool down at the very highest resolution and frame rates. If that's an issue, use a GH6...
May 13, 2023 15:48:40 #
User ID wrote:
I have and even taking care to keep the camera on my shady side and in shadow, I have had cameras overheat and shut down, and that’s shooting stills not video.I have never been hiking with a blazing sun ooking my camera cuz I never "wear" a camera ... its in the bag until Im about to actually use it.
May 13, 2023 15:56:27 #
User ID wrote:
I have never been hiking with a blazing sun ooking my camera cuz I never "wear" a camera ... its in the bag until Im about to actually use it.
Having lived in a "Dry heat" as well as steaming jungles. When I did have a camera, outside of a small instamatic I could conceal under my hat, I have never had a camera fail due to heat and exposure to the sun. Up to 122 degrees F.
May 13, 2023 18:10:14 #
JD750 wrote:
I have and even taking care to keep the camera on my shady side and in shadow, I have had cameras overheat and shut down, and that’s shooting stills not video.
I live in the NE and you live in SoCal.
May 13, 2023 18:13:04 #
User ID wrote:
Yep and the sun is fierce here.I live in the NE and you live in SoCal.
May 13, 2023 19:04:29 #
Architect1776 wrote:
Having lived in a "Dry heat" as well as steaming jungles. When I did have a camera, outside of a small instamatic I could conceal under my hat, I have never had a camera fail due to heat and exposure to the sun. Up to 122 degrees F.
They usually don't fail when making stills. It's when recording video that many dSLRs and mirrorless bodies overheat.
May 13, 2023 20:00:25 #
burkphoto wrote:
They usually don't fail when making stills. It's when recording video that many dSLRs and mirrorless bodies overheat.
True, but the comment was just carrying it around not in use at all.
May 13, 2023 20:27:34 #
Architect1776 wrote:
True, but the comment was just carrying it around not in use at all.
Ha! Seems like a call to customer service would be in order.
In the early days of hand calculators I had one that would not work if it was cold. I had to keep it inside my coat next to my skin on those cold Windy City days. I finally upgraded to an HP15C which I still use 35, Holy cow, years later.
May 14, 2023 01:58:58 #
JD750 wrote:
............... finally upgraded to an HP15C which I still use 35, Holy cow, years later.
Just never can tell watch jewel disc cover when yore turning the plays incite doubt looking for a 62 to 55mm step down ring.
(Download)
Cleanly no good raison that this 60/2.8 was billet width a 62mm filth or threat.
(Download)
May 14, 2023 14:00:19 #
User ID, I had one of those Sharp calculators as well, :) but it gave up the ghost long ago.
Maybe they used the lens barrels they had in stock when the designed the lens
Maybe they used the lens barrels they had in stock when the designed the lens
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.