I thought I'd post my son's backyard in an attempt to copy Angler's digital art style. I did this entirely in PS. Original was taken by my son on an iPhone. Sadly - I flattened the file except for a final curves touch-up. I really like Angler's and I'm inspired to try this again on the right photo - thinking decaying barn or house.
Leaving the sky realistic accents the vibration surreal image of the yard. The real sky was a good decision waltnetto.
Have you been warned that playful pp is addictive?
The effect works really well on several of the elements here, I think, the grasses and fort/playhouse in particular. Enjoy your journey and be sure to come back to share new results!
Not a fan of that technique at all, sorry.
dpullum wrote:
Leaving the sky realistic accents the vibration surreal image of the yard. The real sky was a good decision waltnetto.
Tried it including the sky Dpullum - Didn't like it at all. Thanks for your sharing your thoughts
angler wrote:
Excellent Waltnetto.
Thanks Angler - you were the inspiration to try it.
Linda From Maine wrote:
Have you been warned that playful pp is addictive?
The effect works really well on several of the elements here, I think, the grasses and fort/playhouse in particular. Enjoy your journey and be sure to come back to share new results!
Now I know where the shaking comes from when I am separated from working with PS! There is no cure...
Thank you for the comments!
jaymatt wrote:
Not a fan of that technique at all, sorry.
No apology necessary. I'm not a fan of many, many aspects of life (and PS).
At first I didn't like and I went away. I came back for another look and started to like it. Went away again. Came back once more and decided I think I could see this framed and up on the wall. I don't think I've had that feeling not liking and then thinking its good enough for a wall hanging before.
Good Job. WOW I surprised myself.
Thanks for sharing.
Jim
Jim-Pops wrote:
At first I didn't like and I went away. I came back for another look and started to like it. Went away again. Came back once more and decided I think I could see this framed and up on the wall. I don't think I've had that feeling not liking and then thinking its good enough for a wall hanging before.
Good Job. WOW I surprised myself.
Thanks for sharing.
Jim
Well thank you Jim-Pops. Isn't life interesting in so many ways!
Additional info - I said the PP was all done in PS but I couldn't remember and I had flattened the file. That didn't sit well with me so I spent some time trying to recreate the effects. Turns out the effect was done with the PS sliders in Oil Paint. (of course I did a curves levels adjustment to warm the tones up and a "select sky" to eliminate the effects from the sky).
Further experimentation (and this may come as no surprise to many UHHers) the level of the effect has a hidden control... DPI. I lowered the original dpi from 300 to 72 and the results were astounding (not better). I then tried other DPI settings and each large change made the image look quite different. (I never changed the sliders inside Oil Paint). I really enjoyed the exercise. So my original post is on the first page here. This one is the 72DPI version so you can see what I'm babbling about. (oh- I didn't exclude the sky on this one)
Thanks for looking.
waltnetto wrote:
...Further experimentation (and this may come as no surprise to many UHHers) the level of the effect has a hidden control: DPI...
Googling the PS Oil Paint filter, I found a list of the effects that you can control with sliders. I've attached a screen print below. You mentioned "level of effect." That's usually an
opacity slider.
I'm
nearly 100% positive that the change you documented isn't related to DPI. But I haven't been wrong yet today, so I'm due
Let me know what you discover, if you get a chance.
I really like the first one better. This new one is too abstract for me, can't find anything to relate to.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.