jtm1943 wrote:
I've had quite a few pocket-sized P&S cameras. What i've found is their are always some compromises and none are perfect. The Sony RX100 vii is the best of the bunch. Features - Panasonics, but let down by the lens quality and focusing in low light, somewhat noisy, Olympus - Stylus 1, good long lens, except at max zoom, smaller sensor, Canon G5X ii - good lens, slow to no focus in low light, 720 HS - long lens poor picture quality, don't know about the others, Sony - HX99 long lens, small sensor, uses tiny card, RX100VA - short, fast lens, fast focus in low light, lens too short, Sony RX100 vii, fast focus in low light, slower, but longer lens - best of the bunch, Casio EX - not bad, no viewfinder, long, sharp lens.
What I've found is a "better" lens (for low light) does no good if the camera can't focus or has slow focus. It does no good if the processor or sensor adds a bunch of noise to the pictures. It does no good if the lens gives burry pictures in low light. It does no good if the menu is so convoluted as to make the camera unusable.
Best of the bunch is the Sony RX100 vii for overall picture quality, longish, but slower lens (200mm), sensor (stacked 1 inch), good focusing in low light, The menu is ridiculously complex, but the saving grace is the FN button and the My Menu where in both you can choose what to place there and what to use, and forget the other stuff, good quality pictures even at high ISO.
I have rejected some of the shorter (24-70mm lens) cameras as the lens is just to short and limiting, and some of the bigger bridge cameras as to big and many have very small sensors. That's my take on the whole pocketable, travel cameras.
John
I've had quite a few pocket-sized P&S cameras.... (
show quote)
Thank you John, I am looking at the Sony, Canon and Panasonic one inch sensor cameras and will take your advice to heart.