Once again you wingers don't have the whole story. Yes, the original payment was made by Cohen on his M checking account. Then Trump wrote Michael Cohen a check to reimburse him. That check was from the Trump organization and signed by Trump. None of the payoff as to this part of the story was a lie and the entire incident was disclosed by Cohen, prior to this article.
As to the Statute of Limitations? In New York, the statute of limitations is 5 years for this type of crime. However, the clock stops whenever the subject leaves the state. In this case, there were four years when he was living in the White House and another year when he was living in Florida.
Please try to include a few facts in your allegations as doing what you did, just highlights your ignorance in this matter.
Frank T wrote:
Once again you wingers don't have the whole story. Yes, the original payment was made by Cohen on his M checking account. Then Trump wrote Michael Cohen a check to reimburse him. That check was from the Trump organization and signed by Trump. None of the payoff as to this part of the story was a lie and the entire incident was disclosed by Cohen, prior to this article.
As to the Statute of Limitations? In New York, the statute of limitations is 5 years for this type of crime. However, the clock stops whenever the subject leaves the state. In this case, there were four years when he was living in the White House and another year when he was living in Florida.
Please try to include a few facts in your allegations as doing what you did, just highlights your ignorance in this matter.
Once again you wingers don't have the whole story.... (
show quote)
FACTS!?
You want chump monkeys to accept FACTS?
If they could do that, they wouldn't be chump monkeys!
Frank T wrote:
Please try to include a few facts in your allegations as doing what you did, just highlights your ignorance in this matter.
Why would I reply to an imbecile who cannot construct a proper sentence?
LinksUp wrote:
Why would I reply to an imbecile who cannot construct a proper sentence?
Please diagram the sentence and inform me, of what you believe is improper construction.
If you chose not to respond, I'll just assume you are an ignorant trump monkey.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Frank T wrote:
Please diagram the sentence and inform me, of what you believe is improper construction.
If you chose not to respond, I'll just assume you are an ignorant trump monkey.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
That SHOULD BE, choose, not to respond. Let us know when you are capable of doing an entire paragraph without mistakes.
Dennis
dennis2146 wrote:
That SHOULD BE, choose, not to respond. Let us know when you are capable of doing an entire paragraph without mistakes.
Dennis
Let me try again.
You are a lowlife Trump Monkey whose opinion has no impact on anyone, other than your cat.
Perhaps you should go out on the stroll with your wife and keep an eye on her.
Frank T wrote:
Please diagram the sentence and inform me, of what you believe is improper construction.
If you chose not to respond, I'll just assume you are an ignorant trump monkey.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Oh dearest Francine. You really know how to step in it, dont' you? Its 'choose' not 'chose'. You are the living
definition of the word libTard.
Ok, now that we all know that you are a moron, let's address your other issues.
Please read this senctence out loud.
Quote:
Please try to include a few facts in your allegations as doing what you did, just highlights your ignorance in this matter.
In what world does that make sense? True, they are words from the English language. But throwing random words together does not constitute a sentence. That comma is another affront to this sentence. It does not do anything other than alter the flow creating a jarring collision in my mind as I read it.
Secondly, why did you 'ghost' me on a different thread when I asked for verifiaction and evidence of your statements? You ran away with your skirts hiked up to your waist. You once again have shown that what you accuse other people of, you yourself are guilty of the same. I have no allegiance to Trump. I just believe you are a liar and a troll with a desire to stir up hatred and division.
By the way, do you have any facts to refute the original article? Or do you just hurl insults?
Frank T wrote:
Let me try again.
You are a lowlife Trump Monkey whose opinion has no impact on anyone, other than your cat.
Perhaps you should go out on the stroll with your wife and keep an eye on her.
Once AGAIN little pussy, your writing sk**ls come across as piss poor at best. Accuracy in what you post is definitely not your strong suit, is it?
I am definitely not low life; I leave that to you lying corrupt stupid Left Wingers. I have numerous accomplishments in my life I and others are quite proud of. My opinion has been highly regarded by numerous people right here in The Attic as you must already know but are too ignorant to acknowledge. Next up on the absolutely i***tic comments you made: I have no cat and no wife. WTF you get your information, almost always WRONG, is something Conservatives will never be able to comprehend. Everything you post points out your ability to post incorrect bulls**t at best and lies.
Keep up the stupid i***tic postings. After all that is all we have come to expect from you.
Dennis
Give the Chump Monkeys a few facts and they respond with grammar lessons filled with grammar mistakes.
gorgehiker wrote:
Give the Chump Monkeys a few facts and they respond with grammar lessons filled with grammar mistakes.
Just giving her what she asked for. Still waiting for what I asked for.
dennis2146 wrote:
That SHOULD BE, choose, not to respond. Let us know when you are capable of doing an entire paragraph without mistakes.
Dennis
What a low life hypocrite!
Aren't you the one who gets highly defensive when YOUR typo mistakes are noted?
And,
Choose is tense...
Chose is past tense... so, Mr. hypocrite, being that linksup did NOT respond accordingly, which one is correct?
LinksUp wrote:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/letter-shows-false-claims-made-to-investigators-about-michael-cohens-130000-hush-money-payment-to-stormy-daniels-report
Bwhaaaaaaaa!! Another nothing burger!
How much $$$ do they get to waste in pursuit of their TDS?
Ever hear of Statute of Limitations?
Are there not real crime issues in NY that need to be taken care of?
How many more Roadrunner episodes do we have to watch before the i***t libs figure out their “traps” are not going to work?
Meanwhile, Republicans are the dumbest vegetables.
Frank T wrote:
Once again you wingers don't have the whole story. Yes, the original payment was made by Cohen on his M checking account. Then Trump wrote Michael Cohen a check to reimburse him. That check was from the Trump organization and signed by Trump. None of the payoff as to this part of the story was a lie and the entire incident was disclosed by Cohen, prior to this article.
As to the Statute of Limitations? In New York, the statute of limitations is 5 years for this type of crime. However, the clock stops whenever the subject leaves the state. In this case, there were four years when he was living in the White House and another year when he was living in Florida.
Please try to include a few facts in your allegations as doing what you did, just highlights your ignorance in this matter.
Once again you wingers don't have the whole story.... (
show quote)
Leaves a state or no longer has a residence in a state? So if I commit a crime, I can beat the rap by just crossing the state line into the adjacent state? Just askin since you're the resident expert on this topic.
gorgehiker wrote:
Give the Chump Monkeys a few facts and they respond with grammar lessons filled with grammar mistakes.
Frank is a trump monkey? I had no idea.
He is the one screeching about sentence structure issues and using misspelled words in his screech.
Rather humorous.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.