Rich2236 Loc: E. Hampstead, New Hampshire

Excellent image,BB. She may be thin, but like the saying goes, "The closer to the bone, the sweeter the meat!"

riderxlx Loc: DFW area Texas

The first thing I noticed was how her hair and facial expression was captured perfectly. Very nice shot. Thank you for posting.
Bruce.

DukeTarHeel Loc: NC's "Research Triangle"

Great pose, lighting, and grey scale

mjc925 Loc: SF Bay Area

I am going to disagree with most, I think the model looks very nice, not emaciated nor too skinny. Obviously she is very thin, but for this image I think it works very well (and I don't find her unhealthy thin). I like the stomach sucked in a bit in this image, she has a great stomach and I think the curve of the rib-cage and sternum adds some texture and interest. Her face doesn't look gaunt. My go to for too skinny is the clavicle and upper chest and neither strike me as unhealthy skinny or bones jutting out too much. Her breasts are small, but well proportioned, firm and don't look emaciated. Her bicep is larger than her wrist. I am not saying she isn't skinny by any means, she is very skinny, I just don't find her unattractively or unhealthily skinny. I like the image in BW I like the model, the exposure, the "glow" to the skin tones. Anyway, thanks for posting, I enjoyed it. I do find it just a bit ironic that 25 years ago we would very rarely say a model was far too skinny, but we would often say a model was too heavy. Today, we can say a model is too skinny with no pushback, but call a model here or anywhere too heavy and you are in for a tsunami of grief.

dat2ra Loc: Sacramento

Come on guys; this is a photo board, not a "let's criticize the model" board. I think the photo is excellent and the model is lovely. Yes, she's thin, but the entire frame is well executed.

BB4A

Thanks All for your positive comments.