A research firm hired by former President Donald Chump's 2020 campaign to validate the former president's claims of e******n f***d instead was unable to find evidence to support his theories, nor were the findings released to the public.
A research firm hired by former President Donald Chump's 2020 campaign to validate the former president's claims of e******n f***d instead was unable to find evidence to support his theories, nor were the findings released to the public.
A research firm hired by former President Donald Chump's 2020 campaign to validate the former president's claims of e******n f***d instead was unable to find evidence to support his theories, nor were the findings released to the public.
Mueller didn't acquit Trump, his lack of evidence acquitted Trump.
The words 'acquit' and 'exonerated' were NEVER used by anyone officially connected to the Muller report except ... maybe Barr once or twice when he'd been drinking.
The word 'acquit' was NEVER used by anyone officially connected to the Muller report except maybe Barr once or twice when he'd been drinking.
LOL so dumb, Mueller was not in a position to convict or acquit Trump, his lack of evidence implies that he was not found guilty and therefore acquitted.
LOL so dumb, Mueller was not in a position to convict or acquit Trump, his lack of evidence implies that he was not found guilty and therefore acquitted.
At least you've stopped saying Muller acquitted him. Small steps eh?
You continue to allow the whackos to deflect from the subject matter.
This post has NOTHING to do with the Mueller investigation yet quack got you to move off of the FACT that Trumpty Dumpty and all his men couldn't find evidence of fraud.
I'm also laughing at the FACT that none of the Attic Whinos have joined in to this discussion.
You continue to allow the whackos to deflect from the subject matter.
This post has NOTHING to do with the Mueller investigation yet quack got you to move off of the FACT that Trumpty Dumpty and all his men couldn't find evidence of fraud.
I'm also laughing at the FACT that none of the Attic Whinos have joined in to this discussion.
Yeah, a whack job like you is just upset that your hypocrisy has been exposed. I knew they were going to find evidence of fraud cause there really wasn’t any. And you lefties couldn’t find evidence that Trump colluded with Russia yet you whack job conspiracy cult members pushed it for 4-5 years.
You continue to allow the whackos to deflect from the subject matter.
This post has NOTHING to do with the Mueller investigation yet quack got you to move off of the FACT that Trumpty Dumpty and all his men couldn't find evidence of fraud.
I'm also laughing at the FACT that none of the Attic Whinos have joined in to this discussion.
Deflectors are going to deflect, I don't care. I saw Rac making excellent progress and just had to comment on it.
Besides, all the attic alties, except maybe two of them, know there was no 2022 mass e******n f***d.
A research firm hired by former President Donald Chump's 2020 campaign to validate the former president's claims of e******n f***d instead was unable to find evidence to support his theories, nor were the findings released to the public.
A research firm hired by former President Donald C... (show quote)
Did they look at 2000 Mules? Did they look at Zuckerbucks's illegal $419 million donation to Democrat mail-in v****g in those states? Did they look at WI and PA where they violated the Constitution and illegally changed the v****g laws?
Mueller didn't acquit Trump, his lack of evidence acquitted Trump.
Sorry RAC, that is not an accurate statement.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Special counsel Robert Mueller said Wednesday that charging President Donald Trump with a crime was “not an option” because of federal rules, but he used his first public remarks on the Russia investigation to emphasize that he did not exonerate the president.
“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mueller declared.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Special counsel Robert Mueller said Wednesday that charging President Donald Trump with a crime was “not an option” because of federal rules, but he used his first public remarks on the Russia investigation to emphasize that he did not exonerate the president.
“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mueller declared.
Sorry RAC, that is not an accurate statement. br ... (show quote)
Mueller was talking about possible obstruction of justice, not collusion with Russia in that statement which is a different issue. Again, we are talking about Trump allegedly conspiring to collude with Russia, which there is no evidence.