Practicing With The 1.4X Ext
Feb 12, 2023 14:30:34 #
On the 70-200 2.8 II there is slight loss of image quality but it can be mostly recovered in post.
Feb 12, 2023 14:33:27 #
Feb 12, 2023 14:44:52 #
Amator21
Loc: California
joer wrote:
On the 70-200 2.8 II there is slight loss of image quality but it can be mostly recovered in post.
All lovely!
Poul.
Feb 12, 2023 16:37:05 #
Feb 12, 2023 17:38:14 #
Feb 12, 2023 20:05:33 #
joer wrote:
On the 70-200 2.8 II there is slight loss of image quality but it can be mostly recovered in post.
Feb 13, 2023 05:42:46 #
joer wrote:
On the 70-200 2.8 II there is slight loss of image quality but it can be mostly recovered in post.
Nice set Joe.
Feb 13, 2023 09:03:06 #
Feb 13, 2023 09:34:51 #
Feb 13, 2023 09:38:07 #
tcthome wrote:
They look great. You like using this set up better than a longer tele?
I haven't made up my mind yet since having the extender for only 2 days. So far it looks promising.
My long lens is 100-400 f4.6-5.6 GM. In comparison, the 70-200/1.4X is lighter, has a fixed length (does not extend) and is 1 stop faster which should provide some advantage for the way I take bird images in my situation.
Feb 13, 2023 09:42:37 #
Feb 13, 2023 15:01:28 #
Feb 14, 2023 07:24:20 #
prcb1949
Loc: Ex Zimbabwe - Now UK
joer wrote:
On the 70-200 2.8 II there is slight loss of image quality but it can be mostly recovered in post.
Excellent Shots Joe
Feb 16, 2023 17:18:38 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.