PHRubin wrote:
I am not sure I understand the function of a shutter in a MILC. It must be open for the EVF to work, so why is it even needed?
A mechanical shutter is still the better choice for action photography... anything involving movement, but especially faster movement (of the subject, or the camera, or both).
Electronic shutter is fine with stationary subjects, but in current cameras any significant movement can and will cause a "rolling shutter" effect that in turn causes distortion in images. This is because of how digital image sensors work. They are made up of many rows of pixel sites and when an image is made the data is read off one row at a time. This happens very quickly, BUT not quickly enough that moving subjects won't cause distortions because the last part of the data is read out so much later than the first part... the subject (or camera) has moved
while the image data was being read off the sensor. The larger the image sensor and the higher its resolution, the more this becomes an issue.
Here is an article about rolling shutter effect, with some good examples of it:
https://www.dpreview.com/videos/3277074851/rolling-shutter-explained-with-simple-side-by-side-examplesWhat is needed in an e-shutter to avoid rolling shutter issues is extremely fast sensor data readout. Ideally, a "global" sensor would be used, which essentially "dumps" all it's data at once. These exist, but are VERY expensive. They are mostly only used in cinema cameras that cost tens of thousands of dollars! A more practical solution is a type of image sensor that's able to read out line-by-line at an ultra fast rate. That is what Nikon has done in their Z9 to be able to be able to do away with the mechanical shutter entirely. This still demands a lot of advanced tech that makes for rather expensive cameras... but we're talking thousands of dollars instead of tens of thousands.
While we are likely to see more and more cameras with only an e-shutter... as cost of ultra-fast reading sensors and probably even global shutters will eventually come down... right now it's far more cost efficient to provide a mechanical shutter that doesn't lead to rolling shutter effects. This allows camera makers to do a little sleight of hand in their marketing. "Our camera can shoot at xxx frames a second with it's e-shutter." What they don't mention is that it also will cause a lot of image distortion if the subject is moving (and what would be the point of taking 30 frames/sec, 60 frames/sec or even higher shots of a stationary subject?!). To avoid that rolling shutter effect, you'll need to use the mechanical shutter. (Note: There may be are other limitations associated with high frame rate photography, including inability to focus continuously or file size restrictions such as reduced resolution, less bit depth or greater data compression.)
Another reason mirrorless might have a mechanical shutter is to cover and protect the image sensor whenever the lens is removed. Mirrorless have their sensors much farther forward in the camera body, compared to DSLRs. The mirrorless' sensor is less recessed. It's more vulnerable to dust, rain drops, misplaced fingers, etc. A shutter might help protect the image sensor, even if the camera only has an e-shutter for actual exposures.