EkingbirdRI wrote:
CHG_CANON I have looked at some of the Utube videos but without downloading each program as you're saying, and trying each, would be really time consuming. I don't know that it would be the way to go. Thanks
The commercial software can run 'cheap' ish in the $50 range to 'expensive', in say the $300 range, with subscriptions maybe around $120 per year. Some software advertises 'purchase', but it really is an initial purchase with yearly for-fee updates, getting very close to the same $120 / year 'subscription'.
My point is: don't fall into the typical trap of the UHH community where they buy a $50 title, then buy $80 software, then subscribe $120 for a few years, then upgrade the $80 software with a new $85 release, all the while never learning how to effectively use any of these titles, sometimes not even installing one of the paid-for titles.
A few replies above have suggested trying to define 'what' you want to accomplish in digital editing. Your bird example looks nice, but those of us that edit our images might think it needs a minimum of the following:
1. Noise Processing
2. Sharpening
3. Better contrast
The three ideas above might run as easy as pressing the <auto> option from any candidate title. My suggestion for at least one test image, say this bird, would help you assess how each tool works to perform pretty much the same edit ideas in the title's own unique way.
You can approach selecting your software anyway that best fits your style and discretionary funds. As noted, GIMP is free. Maybe that's the best way to start, learning some of the basics that are common to all software, even if the menu options are slightly different in each title. Even if you don't use / keep GIMP, what you learn there will help you better decide the next title to try.
The free software available for download from your camera vendor is another idea. Alas, that camera software will tend to be more focused on processing RAW as RAW files are unique to each camera model. If you shoot in JPEG, the camera vendor software may be next to useless.