therwol wrote:
24.2 megapixels. For still photography, I've been spoiled by 36 and 45 megapixel Nikon cameras. If I were only interested in video, maybe, but there are already other options.
The vast majority of folks who will buy this camera are hybrid photographers.
We make videos with still photos in them.
We make still photos that will seldom be blown up to very large sizes, or will be shown on the Internet.
Most of us are not nature/wildlife/sports action, or landscape photographers.
In short, we make short films, documentaries, TV commercials, training content for corporate use, "day in the life of a family" videos and stills, "in memoriam" videos, or "B-Roll" for cable sports network features like one of my twins just did for ACC network on ESPN. And we make content for YouTube, Instagram, and other social media.
A 20 MP to 25 MP camera is fine for that. What really counts is ease of use. Panasonic has had the right video production features in these for some time. Now they have improved the final puzzle piece of AF for those who actually need or use it. Many GHx camera users and S1H or S5 users focus manually, because that's what filmmakers do. We work from a script and storyboard, plan our scenes, and photograph them to specifications. Focus is "pulled" from point A to point B in a clip, or it stays the same throughout. At least, it happens that way MOST of the time.
Phase Detect AF simply makes this camera far more appealing to video bloggers, and to the general photography public who rely on AF and expect it to work well. It's not perfect, yet, but it's good enough for most uses. And at a $2000 price point, it's pretty stiff competition for hybrid customers who otherwise would buy a Canon, Sony, or Nikon at that price. Those of us who never had it will use it, too, in situations where we would never trust CDAF alone.
Hugh Brownstone does a great analysis. Those who watched the video that Gerald linked will recognize the face:
https://youtu.be/A06GnDOx0vE