andymac wrote:
I have a 2014 27" iMac which I have really enjoyed. With 8 years on it now it has begun to slow and have issues with the newest software and larger file sizes. Like many iMac users I've been disappointed that Apple, though they replaced their 21" iMac with a 24" iMac, that they have for now discontinued their 27" models with no alternative with now comparable alternative.
At first I looked at the now near 2 year old 24" M1 iMac. Then Apple announces the new Studio iMac series.With significantly upgraded M1 chips I've been thinking that the better (though more expensive approach than a 24" iMac) would be to purchase a Studio iMac M1 Max with 32G Ram and 1 TB hard drive. This requires purchasing a monitor separately. Over all a big investment that hopefully will again serve me 7-8 years. I cannot afford the companion Apple monitor so I am looking at BENQ 24 or 27" instead.
Has anyone taken this or similar approach and if so what has been your experience.
I have a 2014 27" iMac which I have really en... (
show quote)
With the jump to Apple Silicon and all that radical change, the entire Mac line-up is very different. The rumor mill is ripe with thoughts that we are going to see many new Mac computers in 2023. One of them is likely to be a re-designed Mac mini/Mac mini Pro, another is a 27" iMac/iMac Pro, and the long-awaited Mac Pro. But I'm not holding my breath...
The Mac STUDIO is not an iMac. It has more in common with the Mac mini, physically, although it is a very different machine on the inside. It is made for very high end graphics applications such as mathematical modeling, 8K video editing, advanced graphic design work, and so on. Unless you need EXTREME graphics processing power for those tasks, it can be a big waste of money! A lot of folks coming back to buy another Mac don't realize just how freaking much faster the new machines are than the Intel machines they replace. If you want to watch some video reviews, go to YouTube and look up these channels:
René Ritchie
https://youtu.be/17Ik7nPORS4 PLEASE watch this video.
GregsGadgets
https://youtu.be/V7FVHeVL5dw and this one, too.
Luke Miani
MaxTech
Everyday Dad
Marques Brownlee
Mark Ellis Reviews
iJustine
See, the main difference between an M1, an M1 Pro, an M1 Max, and an M1 Ultra is the number of power cores vs efficiency cores and the number of graphics cores and dedicated video encoders and decoders. Another significant difference is the amount of storage and unified memory available. ALL of these machines have almost identical *single core* performance. The M2 is a little faster at single core performance and has more dedicated encoder/decoder circuits for video. If you don't use applications that are multi-threaded and take advantage of multiple cores at the same time (to take a problem apart and solve it more quickly with multiple cores), then the performance boost of the Pro, Max, and Ultra machines may never benefit you.
If you are simply editing photos and doing light video editing up to 4K, any of the new Macs will work well, to a point. I would rather have a lesser M1 or M2 or M1 Pro with more memory and storage than an M1 Max or Ultra equipped Studio that I'll never get much benefit from. In my case, I bought an M1 MacBook Air with 1TB storage and 16GB Unified Memory. I've used it for moderate to heavy Photoshop and Lightroom work with no issues. I edited an 867 GIGABYTE 4K video on it, although that was using an external drive to hold the files. It worked fine for that, only slowing down a little from heat when rendering output to a 4K .mp4 file. That was a HUGE project, and once I figured out where to stash all my media, it worked fine on the MacBook Air.
My son has a MacBook Pro 14" with M1 Pro, 32GB Unified Memory, and 1TB internal storage. It FLIES through everything he throws at it. He uses it for Blender, and a lot more pro video work than I do. He also tends to leave a TON of apps open at the same time.
We both use external monitors with the laptops when at home, and plug into TVs in rental condos, or hotels. Here's my complete setup:
M1 MacBook Air: with 1TB storage, 16GB memory, Apple Refurbished
Portable dock:
https://www.charjenpro.com/products/ultimatedock HDMI 4K/60fps video
Gigabit Ethernet
Two USB 3.2 Type A ports @ 10Gbps
Headphone jack for line out from 96KHz DACs
Power delivery input for laptop charging up to 100W
SD/Micro SD 4.0 UHS I/II readers
LG 27UP850-W 27” UHD (3840 x 2160) IPS Monitor
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=LG+27UP850-W+27”+UHD+%283840+x+2160%29+IPS+MonitorThis monitor has 95% P3 color gamut, connects to the MacBook Air via USB-C and fast-charges it, contains a hub with two (slow) USB-A ports (I used them for my wired keyboard and a backup drive). It rotates 90,° can optionally be VESA-mounted, calibrates to match the laptop (and my prints) with my Datacolor SpyderXElite, and also has input jacks for HDMI and DisplayPort sources. (You can connect multiple sources and switch among them!)
Samsung T7 Portable 2TB SSD:
https://www.amazon.com/SAMSUNG-Portable-SSD-1TB-MU-PC1T0R/dp/B0874XWW23? About $2500 with tax, total. Of course, I connect a lot of drives and older peripherals via the dock and another hub.
Today, I would get the same system with an M2 MacBook Air with 24GB memory and 2TB storage. If I didn't need a laptop, I'd probably get a fully maxed-out Mac mini or a fully maxed-out iMac.
As you have discovered, Macs have a practical market life between about five and seven years. Such is the pace of advancement of information technology. No one except Apple knows when they will release new Macs, but it's been a while since the M2 laptops came out. No doubt, they are milking their current products for all they are worth, especially with the world-wide shortage of semiconductors and the nagging sense of a slowdown in the world-wide economy.