Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
True Colors: J6 Staff Lash Out at Liz Cheney for Allegedly Burying Parts of the Investigation
Nov 28, 2022 05:32:43   #
WNYShooter Loc: WNY
 
https://jonathanturley.org/2022/11/25/true-colors-j6-staff-lash-out-at-liz-cheney-for-allegedly-burying-parts-of-the-investigation/

There is a deepening division on the J6 C*******e as staffers turn on Liz Cheney over the final report on the J****** 6th r**t. Angry rhetoric is flying with staffers accusing the Committee of becoming a “Cheney 2024 campaign” while both the Cheney spokesperson and Committee spokesperson lashed out at the staff members as “disgruntled” and producing shoddy or biased work. The underlying issue, however, is important and revealing. The Committee’s color coated teams include a “Blue Team” on the failure to prepare adequately for the r**t. That part of the investigation is reportedly being dumped or reduced. Members of the “Green” and “Purple” teams are also reportedly irate.

Cheney was soundly defeated in her primary in Wyoming and will soon leave Congress. She is being pushed by some Democrats as a possible surprise candidate for House Speaker if they could get a few Republican v**es. That seems highly unlikely. The Republicans are likely to end up with the identical margin held by the Democrats for the past two years. Alternatively, some Democrats want Cheney to run for president either to dog Donald Trump in the primary debates or to run as an independent to siphon off v**es in the general e******n.

That seems to be the suspicion for some staffers in the Washington Post story.

Fifteen former and current staffers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, expressed concerns that important findings unrelated to Trump will not become available to the American public…

Several committee staff members were floored earlier this month when they were told that a draft report would focus almost entirely on Trump and the work of the committee’s “Gold Team,” excluding reams of other investigative work.

Potentially left on the cutting room floor, or relegated to an appendix, were many revelations from the “Blue Team” — the group that dug into the law enforcement and intelligence community’s failure to assess the looming threat and prepare for the well-forecast attack on the Capitol. The proposed report would also cut back on much of the work of the Green Team, which looked at financing for the J*** 6 attack, and the Purple Team, which examined m*****a groups and extremism.

“We all came from prestigious jobs, dropping what we were doing because we were told this would be an important fact-finding investigation that would inform the public,” said one former committee staffer. “But when [the committee] became a Cheney 2024 campaign, many of us became discouraged.”

If true, the report will largely track the virtual exclusive focus of the hearings with open references to the 2024 e******n as an overriding concern.

Some of us have lamented that the J6 C*******e could have been so much more than a one-sided, highly partisan investigation. House Democrats barred two Republican members originally selected by GOP leaders, who then boycotted the panel in response.

Even with the GOP boycott, the Committee could have followed the type of balanced inquiry that pursued allegations tied to the Pearl Harbor attack or Watergate. It could have insisted on balanced hearings with witnesses and dissenting views.

Nevertheless, the committee revealed important, often disturbing details. It was important for Americans to hear from figures like former attorney general Bill Barr and White House lawyers who struggled to counter unfounded advice given to Trump by outside lawyers on challenging the 2020 e******n. There were painful scenes of C*****l p****e overwhelmed at barricades and members of Congress hunkered down in offices.

Yet, the focus on a single approved narrative gave the hearings the feel of an infomercial selling a product that most of us bought two years earlier.

Now, staffers are turning on Cheney who appears to have objected to parts of the final report and wants the report to focus on Trump. Cheney’s spokesman Jeremy Adler said that the staffers in the other teams produced “subpar material” full of “liberal biases.”

Tim Mulvey, the spokesperson for the committee, criticized the staffers speaking to the media as “disgruntled” and added that “they’ve forgotten their duties as public servants and their cowardice is helping Donald Trump and others responsible for the violence of J****** 6th.”

It is obviously hard to address the alleged shoddy work on these other teams or claims of liberal bias. However, the “Blue Team” was a particular interest for some of us. The J6 C*******e virtually ignored the issue despite ample questions over decisions by Congress leading to the r**t.

The Democrats in the final hearing hammered away at documents showing that the agency knew about violent threats in the days leading up to J*** 6th. However, the Democrats have refused to pursue the lack of pr********ns on Capitol Hill as a focus of the hearing. On the day of the r**t, many of us noted (before the breach of security) that there was a relatively light police presence around the Capitol despite the obvious risk of a r**t. Once the crowd surged, they quickly were able to gain access to the building. Conservative media have featured a video showing an officer standing by as crowds poured into the building.

That obviously does not mean that there was not violence or that C*****l p****e did not bravely fight to protect the building. Most of us have denounced the r**t as a desecration of our constitutional process.

Moreover, at some point, officers may have shifted to deescalating as crowds surged into the building. The question is why there were not more substantial barriers, like those used at the White House. Instead, some barriers were composed of a few officers using their bikes.

The available evidence indicates that the House was warned and that the need for National Guard deployments were discussed. There is a concern that, after criticizing such deployment and fencing around the White House in the earlier r**ts, the Democrats did not want to be seen following the same course.

An Inspector General report indicated that police were restricted by Congress in what they could use on that day. Previously, it was disclosed that offers of National Guard support were not accepted prior to the protests. The D.C. government under Mayor Muriel Bowser used only a small number of guardsmen in traffic positions.

That focus was rejected by the Committee members and there were no dissenting views voiced on the Committee as well as a virtual bar on opposing explanations or interpretations of evidence.

The GOP is now expected to fully investigate what the Congress knew and what it did in the days leading to the breach of the Capitol. Clearly, Cheney and others did not believe that the Blue Team full findings were ready to be released. However, those findings could be reviewed by the new GOP majority as it seeks full disclosure on why the Capitol was so quickly overrun on J****** 6th.

Reply
Nov 28, 2022 05:36:58   #
WNYShooter Loc: WNY
 
Ol' Lizzy still hasn't figured out that Ol' Nancy expertly played her right out of the House.

Reply
Nov 28, 2022 06:44:25   #
Blaster34 Loc: Florida Treasure Coast
 
WNYShooter wrote:
Ol' Lizzy still hasn't figured out that Ol' Nancy expertly played her right out of the House.


Live by the partisan sword, die by the partisan sword....Liz is politically dead.

Reply
 
 
Nov 28, 2022 07:06:54   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
WNYShooter wrote:
https://jonathanturley.org/2022/11/25/true-colors-j6-staff-lash-out-at-liz-cheney-for-allegedly-burying-parts-of-the-investigation/

There is a deepening division on the J6 C*******e as staffers turn on Liz Cheney over the final report on the J****** 6th r**t. Angry rhetoric is flying with staffers accusing the Committee of becoming a “Cheney 2024 campaign” while both the Cheney spokesperson and Committee spokesperson lashed out at the staff members as “disgruntled” and producing shoddy or biased work. The underlying issue, however, is important and revealing. The Committee’s color coated teams include a “Blue Team” on the failure to prepare adequately for the r**t. That part of the investigation is reportedly being dumped or reduced. Members of the “Green” and “Purple” teams are also reportedly irate.

Cheney was soundly defeated in her primary in Wyoming and will soon leave Congress. She is being pushed by some Democrats as a possible surprise candidate for House Speaker if they could get a few Republican v**es. That seems highly unlikely. The Republicans are likely to end up with the identical margin held by the Democrats for the past two years. Alternatively, some Democrats want Cheney to run for president either to dog Donald Trump in the primary debates or to run as an independent to siphon off v**es in the general e******n.

That seems to be the suspicion for some staffers in the Washington Post story.

Fifteen former and current staffers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, expressed concerns that important findings unrelated to Trump will not become available to the American public…

Several committee staff members were floored earlier this month when they were told that a draft report would focus almost entirely on Trump and the work of the committee’s “Gold Team,” excluding reams of other investigative work.

Potentially left on the cutting room floor, or relegated to an appendix, were many revelations from the “Blue Team” — the group that dug into the law enforcement and intelligence community’s failure to assess the looming threat and prepare for the well-forecast attack on the Capitol. The proposed report would also cut back on much of the work of the Green Team, which looked at financing for the J*** 6 attack, and the Purple Team, which examined m*****a groups and extremism.

“We all came from prestigious jobs, dropping what we were doing because we were told this would be an important fact-finding investigation that would inform the public,” said one former committee staffer. “But when [the committee] became a Cheney 2024 campaign, many of us became discouraged.”

If true, the report will largely track the virtual exclusive focus of the hearings with open references to the 2024 e******n as an overriding concern.

Some of us have lamented that the J6 C*******e could have been so much more than a one-sided, highly partisan investigation. House Democrats barred two Republican members originally selected by GOP leaders, who then boycotted the panel in response.

Even with the GOP boycott, the Committee could have followed the type of balanced inquiry that pursued allegations tied to the Pearl Harbor attack or Watergate. It could have insisted on balanced hearings with witnesses and dissenting views.

Nevertheless, the committee revealed important, often disturbing details. It was important for Americans to hear from figures like former attorney general Bill Barr and White House lawyers who struggled to counter unfounded advice given to Trump by outside lawyers on challenging the 2020 e******n. There were painful scenes of C*****l p****e overwhelmed at barricades and members of Congress hunkered down in offices.

Yet, the focus on a single approved narrative gave the hearings the feel of an infomercial selling a product that most of us bought two years earlier.

Now, staffers are turning on Cheney who appears to have objected to parts of the final report and wants the report to focus on Trump. Cheney’s spokesman Jeremy Adler said that the staffers in the other teams produced “subpar material” full of “liberal biases.”

Tim Mulvey, the spokesperson for the committee, criticized the staffers speaking to the media as “disgruntled” and added that “they’ve forgotten their duties as public servants and their cowardice is helping Donald Trump and others responsible for the violence of J****** 6th.”

It is obviously hard to address the alleged shoddy work on these other teams or claims of liberal bias. However, the “Blue Team” was a particular interest for some of us. The J6 C*******e virtually ignored the issue despite ample questions over decisions by Congress leading to the r**t.

The Democrats in the final hearing hammered away at documents showing that the agency knew about violent threats in the days leading up to J*** 6th. However, the Democrats have refused to pursue the lack of pr********ns on Capitol Hill as a focus of the hearing. On the day of the r**t, many of us noted (before the breach of security) that there was a relatively light police presence around the Capitol despite the obvious risk of a r**t. Once the crowd surged, they quickly were able to gain access to the building. Conservative media have featured a video showing an officer standing by as crowds poured into the building.

That obviously does not mean that there was not violence or that C*****l p****e did not bravely fight to protect the building. Most of us have denounced the r**t as a desecration of our constitutional process.

Moreover, at some point, officers may have shifted to deescalating as crowds surged into the building. The question is why there were not more substantial barriers, like those used at the White House. Instead, some barriers were composed of a few officers using their bikes.

The available evidence indicates that the House was warned and that the need for National Guard deployments were discussed. There is a concern that, after criticizing such deployment and fencing around the White House in the earlier r**ts, the Democrats did not want to be seen following the same course.

An Inspector General report indicated that police were restricted by Congress in what they could use on that day. Previously, it was disclosed that offers of National Guard support were not accepted prior to the protests. The D.C. government under Mayor Muriel Bowser used only a small number of guardsmen in traffic positions.

That focus was rejected by the Committee members and there were no dissenting views voiced on the Committee as well as a virtual bar on opposing explanations or interpretations of evidence.

The GOP is now expected to fully investigate what the Congress knew and what it did in the days leading to the breach of the Capitol. Clearly, Cheney and others did not believe that the Blue Team full findings were ready to be released. However, those findings could be reviewed by the new GOP majority as it seeks full disclosure on why the Capitol was so quickly overrun on J****** 6th.
https://jonathanturley.org/2022/11/25/true-colors-... (show quote)


Bottom line is that the report will be a campaign ad for the democrats paid for by the public who know it is all a bunch of BS.

Reply
Nov 28, 2022 07:49:50   #
Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast
 
WNYShooter wrote:
https://jonathanturley.org/2022/11/25/true-colors-j6-staff-lash-out-at-liz-cheney-for-allegedly-burying-parts-of-the-investigation/

There is a deepening division on the J6 C*******e as staffers turn on Liz Cheney over the final report on the J****** 6th r**t. Angry rhetoric is flying with staffers accusing the Committee of becoming a “Cheney 2024 campaign” while both the Cheney spokesperson and Committee spokesperson lashed out at the staff members as “disgruntled” and producing shoddy or biased work. The underlying issue, however, is important and revealing. The Committee’s color coated teams include a “Blue Team” on the failure to prepare adequately for the r**t. That part of the investigation is reportedly being dumped or reduced. Members of the “Green” and “Purple” teams are also reportedly irate.

Cheney was soundly defeated in her primary in Wyoming and will soon leave Congress. She is being pushed by some Democrats as a possible surprise candidate for House Speaker if they could get a few Republican v**es. That seems highly unlikely. The Republicans are likely to end up with the identical margin held by the Democrats for the past two years. Alternatively, some Democrats want Cheney to run for president either to dog Donald Trump in the primary debates or to run as an independent to siphon off v**es in the general e******n.

That seems to be the suspicion for some staffers in the Washington Post story.

Fifteen former and current staffers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, expressed concerns that important findings unrelated to Trump will not become available to the American public…

Several committee staff members were floored earlier this month when they were told that a draft report would focus almost entirely on Trump and the work of the committee’s “Gold Team,” excluding reams of other investigative work.

Potentially left on the cutting room floor, or relegated to an appendix, were many revelations from the “Blue Team” — the group that dug into the law enforcement and intelligence community’s failure to assess the looming threat and prepare for the well-forecast attack on the Capitol. The proposed report would also cut back on much of the work of the Green Team, which looked at financing for the J*** 6 attack, and the Purple Team, which examined m*****a groups and extremism.

“We all came from prestigious jobs, dropping what we were doing because we were told this would be an important fact-finding investigation that would inform the public,” said one former committee staffer. “But when [the committee] became a Cheney 2024 campaign, many of us became discouraged.”

If true, the report will largely track the virtual exclusive focus of the hearings with open references to the 2024 e******n as an overriding concern.

Some of us have lamented that the J6 C*******e could have been so much more than a one-sided, highly partisan investigation. House Democrats barred two Republican members originally selected by GOP leaders, who then boycotted the panel in response.

Even with the GOP boycott, the Committee could have followed the type of balanced inquiry that pursued allegations tied to the Pearl Harbor attack or Watergate. It could have insisted on balanced hearings with witnesses and dissenting views.

Nevertheless, the committee revealed important, often disturbing details. It was important for Americans to hear from figures like former attorney general Bill Barr and White House lawyers who struggled to counter unfounded advice given to Trump by outside lawyers on challenging the 2020 e******n. There were painful scenes of C*****l p****e overwhelmed at barricades and members of Congress hunkered down in offices.

Yet, the focus on a single approved narrative gave the hearings the feel of an infomercial selling a product that most of us bought two years earlier.

Now, staffers are turning on Cheney who appears to have objected to parts of the final report and wants the report to focus on Trump. Cheney’s spokesman Jeremy Adler said that the staffers in the other teams produced “subpar material” full of “liberal biases.”

Tim Mulvey, the spokesperson for the committee, criticized the staffers speaking to the media as “disgruntled” and added that “they’ve forgotten their duties as public servants and their cowardice is helping Donald Trump and others responsible for the violence of J****** 6th.”

It is obviously hard to address the alleged shoddy work on these other teams or claims of liberal bias. However, the “Blue Team” was a particular interest for some of us. The J6 C*******e virtually ignored the issue despite ample questions over decisions by Congress leading to the r**t.

The Democrats in the final hearing hammered away at documents showing that the agency knew about violent threats in the days leading up to J*** 6th. However, the Democrats have refused to pursue the lack of pr********ns on Capitol Hill as a focus of the hearing. On the day of the r**t, many of us noted (before the breach of security) that there was a relatively light police presence around the Capitol despite the obvious risk of a r**t. Once the crowd surged, they quickly were able to gain access to the building. Conservative media have featured a video showing an officer standing by as crowds poured into the building.

That obviously does not mean that there was not violence or that C*****l p****e did not bravely fight to protect the building. Most of us have denounced the r**t as a desecration of our constitutional process.

Moreover, at some point, officers may have shifted to deescalating as crowds surged into the building. The question is why there were not more substantial barriers, like those used at the White House. Instead, some barriers were composed of a few officers using their bikes.

The available evidence indicates that the House was warned and that the need for National Guard deployments were discussed. There is a concern that, after criticizing such deployment and fencing around the White House in the earlier r**ts, the Democrats did not want to be seen following the same course.

An Inspector General report indicated that police were restricted by Congress in what they could use on that day. Previously, it was disclosed that offers of National Guard support were not accepted prior to the protests. The D.C. government under Mayor Muriel Bowser used only a small number of guardsmen in traffic positions.

That focus was rejected by the Committee members and there were no dissenting views voiced on the Committee as well as a virtual bar on opposing explanations or interpretations of evidence.

The GOP is now expected to fully investigate what the Congress knew and what it did in the days leading to the breach of the Capitol. Clearly, Cheney and others did not believe that the Blue Team full findings were ready to be released. However, those findings could be reviewed by the new GOP majority as it seeks full disclosure on why the Capitol was so quickly overrun on J****** 6th.
https://jonathanturley.org/2022/11/25/true-colors-... (show quote)

Anomous sources?

Enough said!

The shallow majority in the House might not be enough to move forward with the trump cult's wish to open their own investigation.

The Senate will be in a majority position to pick up where the House 1*6 C*******e left off.

Once the House issues its report, they'll hand over all of the evidence they've uncovered to the DOJ, along with any referrals for further investigation and potential prosecution.

The GQP Members in the House are running scared that they're at risk for indictments!

These are the House Members who were at the December 18, 2020 meeting at the White House!

Mo Brooks *
Tommy Tuberville
John Thune
Jody Hice
JimJordan
Andy Biggs *
Marjorie Taylor Green *
Brian Babin
Matt Gaetz *
Louie Gohmert *
Paul Gosar
Andy Harris
Scott Perry *

* These individuals sought a trump pardon!

Remember that these House Members were conspiring to keep trump in office, don't forgot that Sidney Powell, Michael Flynn, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows were also present at that December 18, 2020 White House Meeting to discuss ways for trump to remain in office after noon on January 20, 2021. Pat Cippelone, and maybe VP Pence were likely the only voices of reason at that meeting.

https://www.businessinsider.com/house-republicans-white-house-meeting-december-21-2020-e******n-2022-7

With the possible exception of Cippelone and Pence, those others are all T*****RS to the US Constitution!

Reply
Nov 28, 2022 08:21:20   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Anomous sources?

Enough said!

The shallow majority in the House might not be enough to move forward with the trump cult's wish to open their own investigation.

The Senate will be in a majority position to pick up where the House 1*6 C*******e left off.

Once the House issues its report, they'll hand over all of the evidence they've uncovered to the DOJ, along with any referrals for further investigation and potential prosecution.

The GQP Members in the House are running scared that they're at risk for indictments!

These are the House Members who were at the December 18, 2020 meeting at the White House!

Mo Brooks *
Tommy Tuberville
John Thune
Jody Hice
JimJordan
Andy Biggs *
Marjorie Taylor Green *
Brian Babin
Matt Gaetz *
Louie Gohmert *
Paul Gosar
Andy Harris
Scott Perry *

* These individuals sought a trump pardon!

Remember that these House Members were conspiring to keep trump in office, don't forgot that Sidney Powell, Michael Flynn, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows were also present at that December 18, 2020 White House Meeting to discuss ways for trump to remain in office after noon on January 20, 2021. Pat Cippelone, and maybe VP Pence were likely the only voices of reason at that meeting.

https://www.businessinsider.com/house-republicans-white-house-meeting-december-21-2020-e******n-2022-7

With the possible exception of Cippelone and Pence, those others are all T*****RS to the US Constitution!
Anomous sources? br br Enough said! br br The sh... (show quote)


Your last sentence regarding the US Constitution says it all.
You are 100% ignorant about it.

Reply
Nov 28, 2022 12:20:42   #
Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast
 
Architect1776 wrote:
Your last sentence regarding the US Constitution says it all.
You are 100% ignorant about it.

Those GQP Members of the House I listed weren't supporting a Peaceful t***sition of power, were they?

Reply
 
 
Nov 28, 2022 12:40:10   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Those GQP Members of the House I listed weren't supporting a Peaceful t***sition of power, were they?


No, they were supporting a losing candidate who conspired to disrupt the Constitution process of certifying l********e e******n results and the will of the people. In the real world, they are t*****rs. In Trump’s world, they are patriotic heroes.

Reply
Nov 28, 2022 14:51:31   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Those GQP Members of the House I listed weren't supporting a Peaceful t***sition of power, were they?


Actually they were.
You cannot prove otherwise.

Reply
Nov 28, 2022 18:25:25   #
Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast
 
Architect1776 wrote:
Actually they were.
You cannot prove otherwise.

It's you who's wrong.

They were part of trump's inner circle who were trying to o*******w the 2020 e******n!

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 12:02:29   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
I say run Cheney for president as an independent to siphon off Democrat v**es in the general e******n.

Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2022 13:40:15   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
WNYShooter wrote:
https://jonathanturley.org/2022/11/25/true-colors-j6-staff-lash-out-at-liz-cheney-for-allegedly-burying-parts-of-the-investigation/

There is a deepening division on the J6 C*******e as staffers turn on Liz Cheney over the final report on the J****** 6th r**t. Angry rhetoric is flying with staffers accusing the Committee of becoming a “Cheney 2024 campaign” while both the Cheney spokesperson and Committee spokesperson lashed out at the staff members as “disgruntled” and producing shoddy or biased work. The underlying issue, however, is important and revealing. The Committee’s color coated teams include a “Blue Team” on the failure to prepare adequately for the r**t. That part of the investigation is reportedly being dumped or reduced. Members of the “Green” and “Purple” teams are also reportedly irate.

Cheney was soundly defeated in her primary in Wyoming and will soon leave Congress. She is being pushed by some Democrats as a possible surprise candidate for House Speaker if they could get a few Republican v**es. That seems highly unlikely. The Republicans are likely to end up with the identical margin held by the Democrats for the past two years. Alternatively, some Democrats want Cheney to run for president either to dog Donald Trump in the primary debates or to run as an independent to siphon off v**es in the general e******n.

That seems to be the suspicion for some staffers in the Washington Post story.

Fifteen former and current staffers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, expressed concerns that important findings unrelated to Trump will not become available to the American public…

Several committee staff members were floored earlier this month when they were told that a draft report would focus almost entirely on Trump and the work of the committee’s “Gold Team,” excluding reams of other investigative work.

Potentially left on the cutting room floor, or relegated to an appendix, were many revelations from the “Blue Team” — the group that dug into the law enforcement and intelligence community’s failure to assess the looming threat and prepare for the well-forecast attack on the Capitol. The proposed report would also cut back on much of the work of the Green Team, which looked at financing for the J*** 6 attack, and the Purple Team, which examined m*****a groups and extremism.

“We all came from prestigious jobs, dropping what we were doing because we were told this would be an important fact-finding investigation that would inform the public,” said one former committee staffer. “But when [the committee] became a Cheney 2024 campaign, many of us became discouraged.”

If true, the report will largely track the virtual exclusive focus of the hearings with open references to the 2024 e******n as an overriding concern.

Some of us have lamented that the J6 C*******e could have been so much more than a one-sided, highly partisan investigation. House Democrats barred two Republican members originally selected by GOP leaders, who then boycotted the panel in response.

Even with the GOP boycott, the Committee could have followed the type of balanced inquiry that pursued allegations tied to the Pearl Harbor attack or Watergate. It could have insisted on balanced hearings with witnesses and dissenting views.

Nevertheless, the committee revealed important, often disturbing details. It was important for Americans to hear from figures like former attorney general Bill Barr and White House lawyers who struggled to counter unfounded advice given to Trump by outside lawyers on challenging the 2020 e******n. There were painful scenes of C*****l p****e overwhelmed at barricades and members of Congress hunkered down in offices.

Yet, the focus on a single approved narrative gave the hearings the feel of an infomercial selling a product that most of us bought two years earlier.

Now, staffers are turning on Cheney who appears to have objected to parts of the final report and wants the report to focus on Trump. Cheney’s spokesman Jeremy Adler said that the staffers in the other teams produced “subpar material” full of “liberal biases.”

Tim Mulvey, the spokesperson for the committee, criticized the staffers speaking to the media as “disgruntled” and added that “they’ve forgotten their duties as public servants and their cowardice is helping Donald Trump and others responsible for the violence of J****** 6th.”

It is obviously hard to address the alleged shoddy work on these other teams or claims of liberal bias. However, the “Blue Team” was a particular interest for some of us. The J6 C*******e virtually ignored the issue despite ample questions over decisions by Congress leading to the r**t.

The Democrats in the final hearing hammered away at documents showing that the agency knew about violent threats in the days leading up to J*** 6th. However, the Democrats have refused to pursue the lack of pr********ns on Capitol Hill as a focus of the hearing. On the day of the r**t, many of us noted (before the breach of security) that there was a relatively light police presence around the Capitol despite the obvious risk of a r**t. Once the crowd surged, they quickly were able to gain access to the building. Conservative media have featured a video showing an officer standing by as crowds poured into the building.

That obviously does not mean that there was not violence or that C*****l p****e did not bravely fight to protect the building. Most of us have denounced the r**t as a desecration of our constitutional process.

Moreover, at some point, officers may have shifted to deescalating as crowds surged into the building. The question is why there were not more substantial barriers, like those used at the White House. Instead, some barriers were composed of a few officers using their bikes.

The available evidence indicates that the House was warned and that the need for National Guard deployments were discussed. There is a concern that, after criticizing such deployment and fencing around the White House in the earlier r**ts, the Democrats did not want to be seen following the same course.

An Inspector General report indicated that police were restricted by Congress in what they could use on that day. Previously, it was disclosed that offers of National Guard support were not accepted prior to the protests. The D.C. government under Mayor Muriel Bowser used only a small number of guardsmen in traffic positions.

That focus was rejected by the Committee members and there were no dissenting views voiced on the Committee as well as a virtual bar on opposing explanations or interpretations of evidence.

The GOP is now expected to fully investigate what the Congress knew and what it did in the days leading to the breach of the Capitol. Clearly, Cheney and others did not believe that the Blue Team full findings were ready to be released. However, those findings could be reviewed by the new GOP majority as it seeks full disclosure on why the Capitol was so quickly overrun on J****** 6th.
https://jonathanturley.org/2022/11/25/true-colors-... (show quote)


Thanks for posting, it is a good read regardless of what Shutter or KMG have to say about it, they are braindead about anything political. I am pretty sure that they now consider Twitter a threat to our democracy coz..... Biden and MSNBC has told them so.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.