OM-1 vs. OM-D E-M1 mkiii
Oct 29, 2022 17:40:21 #
Thinking of switching to Olympus/OM Systems but what are your thoughts on these two cameras, particularly from those who have owned/used both models. Is the extra cost of the OM-1 worth it? Use cases - everything from macro, travel, birds (BIF and posed), nature, landscape, etc. So, AF performance is a biggie.
- thanks! Chris
- thanks! Chris
Oct 30, 2022 05:51:22 #
Chris, I use Olympus M43 system cameras with lenses made by Olympus and Panasonic but I have not used either of the cameras you have mentioned. From what I know the OM-1 is a fantastic tool with a lightning fast AF and other technological innovations that you could check with Olympus or online.
If I were in the market for a new mirrorless it would surely be the OM-1 and there is no comparison between it and the OM-1 Mk III, the OM-1 is a superior and more advanced camera.
If I were in the market for a new mirrorless it would surely be the OM-1 and there is no comparison between it and the OM-1 Mk III, the OM-1 is a superior and more advanced camera.
Oct 30, 2022 07:36:21 #
Chris, I went from the EM1 M2 to the OM-1. The OM-1 is worth the cost. The AF is faster, the noise is much better and if you are shooting BIF the bird identification is a must. The continuous shooting is and writing to cards is faster. As an example I am using a Sandisk Extreme Pro UHS-1 card with a write speed of 170. AT 20 frames per second I stopped shooting before it buffered out and had 120 shots at 1/125. There are so many things that make it better. I have only had it for about two weeks so I am still learning the camera.
Oct 30, 2022 07:46:48 #
There is another player taking the field in the OM-5. I am in your position right now as I need a second body to an EM-1 I have. You have to balance just WHAT kind of photography you do as there is quite a diff. in price and features offered by the iii and OM-5 and just might be enough to satisfy you over the OM-1. Seems at first glance the OM-5 might be a sweet spot.
Oct 30, 2022 08:35:23 #
drsdayton
Loc: Dayton, Ohio
I have the OM-1 and the EM1.3 (and the EM1.2). I often wear both the OM-1 and EM1.3 so I can have different lenses going. The EM1.3 is a nice body but I would suggest just going with the OM-1. Subject Detection is unique to that body and it is really good. The menus are better too. The EV is markedly better.
For landscape the EM1.3 is fine, as is the EM1.2.
Go with the OM-1. The price difference will quickly fade from the picture.
For landscape the EM1.3 is fine, as is the EM1.2.
Go with the OM-1. The price difference will quickly fade from the picture.
Oct 30, 2022 08:59:42 #
BikingKen
Loc: Falls Church, VA
I'll add my voice to the chorus of 'go with the OM-1' I've had and been happy with the OMD-EM 1 in its three iterations. But I am happier with the OM 1. The bird detection feature is very good and has led to a higher keeper rate for me and allows me more freedom to compose on the fly. I debated about going from the EM-1 Mk 3 to the OM 1 and have not regretted the decision.
Oct 30, 2022 09:04:27 #
Chris, I have had the EM-1, EM-1 Mk II, EM-1 Mk III and now the OM-1. I have a full array of Pro Zuiko lenses. I thought the series greatly improved through the years. However, the OM-1 is a marked improvement as other responders have remarked. The animal (or plane or car) detection is phenomenal. Image stabilization, as on previous Olympus cameras with image stabilized lenses, allows me to take images at very slow shutter speed and keep the ISO down. Image quality still suffers at higher ISO that comes into play when I am doing BIF in low light. I make use of the easily engaged High Res ability often. I've just finished two long trips with my OM-1 and have not found battery problems at all. I took many BIF images and still had juice at the end of the day. So, if you have the extra cash go for the OM-1 over an older EM-1 Mk III. Earl
Oct 30, 2022 10:32:44 #
Peteso
Loc: Blacks Hills
Comments about how the EM1X fits into this comparative analysis from M43 users?
Oct 30, 2022 10:35:06 #
I am currently traveling in Europe with two MKiii bodies and one OM1 body. For travel photography, landscape, cityscape, there is not much difference between the MKiii and the OM1. I do like the deeper grip and the menu layout on the OM1, it is better in low light and focused faster. The lens I use most for travel photography, the Zuiko 12-100Pro is kept on the OM1. I have two other Pro lenses on the MKiii; 7-14 and 40-150. If I am going for birds or wild life, I will put the 40-150 on the OM1 as it has bird/animal detection and is much faster tracking BIF.
If I am strictly going for birds, I use .my OMD E-X1 with the Zuiko 150-500 lens
If you intend to soot BIF, I think you will be happiest with the OM1 paired a pro Zuiko lens.
If I am strictly going for birds, I use .my OMD E-X1 with the Zuiko 150-500 lens
If you intend to soot BIF, I think you will be happiest with the OM1 paired a pro Zuiko lens.
Oct 30, 2022 11:06:58 #
Thanks all for your replies...looks like it will be the OM-1 with the OM-D EM1 or the new OM-5 as a 2nd body.
Oct 30, 2022 11:40:21 #
Peteso wrote:
Comments about how the EM1X fits into this comparative analysis from M43 users?
I've had the EM-1, the mkII, the mkIII, and the EM-1X. The OM-1 beats them all. Even the bird AI is better on the OM1 than on the X.
The mkII has starry night AI, and the X has bird AI. The OM-1 has both.
That said, my mkIII and X are both for sale here for a combined price of less than a new OM-1.
Oct 30, 2022 11:44:24 #
chrisg-optical wrote:
Thanks all for your replies...looks like it will be the OM-1 with the OM-D EM1 or the new OM-5 as a 2nd body.
If you need a second body, consider a used mkIII--mine of course.
But I should tell you I'm planning on a second OM-1 because I want both bodies identical to avoid confusion when in a hurry to switch bodies to catch that perfect shot.
Oct 30, 2022 11:59:53 #
chrisg-optical wrote:
Thinking of switching to Olympus/OM Systems but what are your thoughts on these two cameras, particularly from those who have owned/used both models. Is the extra cost of the OM-1 worth it? Use cases - everything from macro, travel, birds (BIF and posed), nature, landscape, etc. So, AF performance is a biggie.
- thanks! Chris
- thanks! Chris
The OM-1 digital Micro 4/3 camera (as opposed to the very OLD OM-1 film camera) is the best body that OM Systems sells right now. It got rave reviews all over the Internet when it arrived. OM-1 is arguably the best Micro 4/3 *stills* camera on the market, while the Panasonic Lumix GH6 is the best Micro 4/3 *video* camera on the market. Both of these top models record BOTH stills and video, so if you are heavily in need of one medium more than the other, choose accordingly.
I've been a Micro 4/3 user since 2015. It is a great platform for my needs. It is not for everyone. But it offers dozens of advantages and tools not found in larger formats.
Chief among reasons to buy is the availability of great lenses from Olympus/OM Systems, Panasonic Lumix and Panasonic Leica, and about half a dozen other brands. If you haven't found these sites, check them out:
https://alikgriffin.com/micro-43-lens-buying-guide/
https://www.four-thirds.org/en/lens/
https://www.m43lenses.com
In addition, adapters and "speed boosters" are available to convert SLR, dSLR, and ciné lenses for use on Micro 4/3 cameras. MetaBones makes some of the best: https://www.metabones.com/products/?c=micro-43-system-2
Oct 30, 2022 12:08:47 #
kenArchi
Loc: Seal Beach, CA
I am still doing everything with my em10 ii.
With the Pana 100-300.
It's fun. I know the Om1 is much better.
With the Pana 100-300.
It's fun. I know the Om1 is much better.
Oct 30, 2022 14:13:17 #
Jerry Coupe
Loc: Kent, WA
Excellent discussion of the two models. I am thinking about adding one of the models and now lean toward the OM-1. Then I plan to convert one of my EM1 MKIIs to IR.
Thanks.
Thanks.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.