Challenge: "Take Two / Re done Images" Sept. 19-24 2022
PAToGraphy wrote:
Worth it, Bob!
Thanks Pat, still could use more changes I think??
RonDavis wrote:
There other evening I saw this strip of golden sunset shinning through the buildings and leading into the park. I got the light behind me to capture my shadow and decided to remove it (PSE). Added the sky and switched to b/w (Luminar) to create the final twilight images....
Nice changes made here Ron!
AnnMurrey wrote:
The 1st is the original, the 2nd is the re do. I changed the sky and cropped a little.
The second one is excellent! What processing software are you using?
RonDavis wrote:
There other evening I saw this strip of golden sunset shinning through the buildings and leading into the park. I got the light behind me to capture my shadow and decided to remove it (PSE). Added the sky and switched to b/w (Luminar) to create the final twilight images....
Light a photographer finds irresistible.
Transbuff1985 wrote:
Thanks Pat, still could use more changes I think??
After a while, your editing mind goes to mush. Leave it and come back to it. Overworking an image isn't always the best.
PAToGraphy wrote:
Ann it is so wonderful to have you posting more frequently again.
I'm glad to see Ann also! Welcome back!!
Transbuff1985 wrote:
Nice changes made here Ron!
Yes, we can put lipstick on a pig.....thanks.
We are talking photo illustration here, not photo journalism.I have no problem with that, but the image done with all the adjustments here should never be passed off as a photo journalistic image. I do understand improving an image for advertising use and do it myself , but There is a fine line that should not be passed. That lighhouse photo is a good example, changing the sky improved the image considerably, but please don't pass it off as journalistic coverage. I am not saying this was the case in this instance as I was not there only expressing my concern if the elements of an image is misused. A very nice and improved image by the way.
Seabastes wrote:
We are talking photo illustration here, not photo journalism.I have no problem with that, but the image done with all the adjustments here should never be passed off as a photo journalistic image. I do understand improving an image for advertising use and do it myself , but There is a fine line that should not be passed. That lighhouse photo is a good example, changing the sky improved the image considerably, but please don't pass it off as journalistic coverage. I am not saying this was the case in this instance as I was not there only expressing my concern if the elements of an image is misused. A very nice and improved image by the way.
We are talking photo illustration here, not photo ... (
show quote)
I feel that it is their image and they can change it and play with it as they wish. No one here is really trying to pass anything over as journalistic, just learning new things. But thank you for your input.
I use lightroom and photoshop. Once in a while I try tuxpi, ACDC, or photoscape. I am still trying to learn how to use photoshop and get the results I want. Thank you.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.