A National Ban on A******n (Page 2): Lindsey is on an island by himself, he is trying to calm the waters about a******n as many of the red state legislatures are for all practical...

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Triple G wrote:

So much for it being the purview of the states! Lindsey sure exposed that GOP LIE!

Lindsey is on an island by himself, he is trying to calm the waters about a******n as many of the red state legislatures are for all practical purposes banning a******n which is politically unpopular and is the only thing that has given the democrats breath in the midterms.

Triple G

Blurryeyed wrote:

Lindsey is on an island by himself, he is trying to calm the waters about a******n as many of the red state legislatures are for all practical purposes banning a******n which is politically unpopular and is the only thing that has given the democrats breath in the midterms.

Clearly, it's not about banning all a******ns (Christian nationalist view) nor states rights (constitutional originalist view). It's only about control. GOP lies exposed.

alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ

I agree with Blurryeyed regarding a******n laws at the national level.

Bill 45

Graham better be carful in the dark with a lot of women around. He could end up face down in the street and no one known anything.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Triple G wrote:

Clearly, it's not about banning all a******ns (Christian nationalist view) nor states rights (constitutional originalist view). It's only about control. GOP lies exposed.

OMG a democrat talking about control, will the hypocrisy never end? Maybe just maybe it is about protecting an unborn baby....

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

I noticed that everybody that is for a******n has already been born. / Ronald Reagan

Triple G

Blurryeyed wrote:

OMG a democrat talking about control, will the hypocrisy never end? Maybe just maybe it is about protecting an unborn baby....

You were a big arguer that it is all about states' rights! How quickly you pander to changing GOP rhetoric

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Triple G wrote:

You were a big arguer that it is all about states' rights! How quickly you pander to changing GOP rhetoric

Why do you lie??
This is what Blurry said...
"Lindsey is on an island by himself, he is trying to calm the waters about a******n as many of the red state legislatures are for all practical purposes banning a******n which is politically unpopular and is the only thing that has given the democrats breath in the midterms."

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Kmgw9v wrote:

You don’t get it. The Republicans should be talking about inflation, not a******n. A******n might be an Achilles heel.
Understand? States rights, not Federal.

Graham said after 15 weeks. What don't you understand about 15 weeks? That is almost 4 months. Most of the civilized world recognizes that a******n is the taking of life after that time. Most of the civilized world except North Korea, China, and the US understand that and care about it.

Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana

Racmanaz wrote:

But that is not what the OP had said, he lied about what Graham said.

The OP stated his perspective on Graham's announcement. It’s his opinion of the announcement. How can that be a lie?

The OP does not need me to defend him. But it just drives me crazy that discussion of issues has to devolve into ad hominem attacks. I know, it’s because we are in The Attic. So what?

srg

Racmanaz wrote:

Why are you taking his words out of context?? Are you intentionally trying to lie about what he actually said?

Why are you always typing things? None of it makes any sense

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

srg wrote:

Why are you always typing things? None of it makes any sense

The irony of you saying that. LOL maybe if you had an education you'd understand exactly what I said cuz it's pretty clear.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Rab-Eye wrote:

The OP stated his perspective on Graham's announcement. It’s his opinion of the announcement. How can that be a lie?

The OP does not need me to defend him. But it just drives me crazy that discussion of issues has to devolve into ad hominem attacks. I know, it’s because we are in The Attic. So what?

The OP took senator Graham's words out of context to give the impression of something he did not actually say. Graham didn't say he wanted a national ban on a******n as the op implied. Graham said he wanted a national ban on a******n after 15 weeks of gestation.

Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida

Racmanaz wrote:

The OP took senator Graham's words out of context to give the impression of something he did not actually say. Graham didn't say he wanted a national ban on a******n as the op implied. Graham said he wanted a national ban on a******n after 15 weeks of gestation.

I said nothing about the content of Graham’s words, took nothing out of context. The post was about the timing of the bill—on a day that we hear unfavorable economic news, why is Lindsey energizing discussion about a******n—he should be pounding Biden.
Further, do the Republicans want Federal control of a******n, or adhere to the Dobb’s decision?
You should read slowly, and stop making crap up to suit your comfort.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Kmgw9v wrote:

I said nothing about the content of Graham’s words, took nothing out of context. The post was about the timing of the bill—on a day that we hear unfavorable economic news, why is Lindsey energizing discussion about a******n—he should be pounding Biden.
Further, do the Republicans want Federal control of a******n, or adhere to the Dobb’s decision?
You should read slowly, and stop making crap up to suit your comfort.

Lol you are such a LIAR. You posted these words... "A National Ban on A******n" on your tread title and you didn't clarify that it was a national ban on a******n proposal AFTER 15 weeks. So you intentionally implied that it was a National a******n ban. You guys are such a liars.