Russia cuts off gas exports to Europe via Nord Stream indefinitely (CNN) (Page 2): I believe it was levying sanctions on companies that were building the pipeline. That could we be...

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Architect1776 wrote:

What interference was there?
What action was taken to interfere?

I believe it was levying sanctions on companies that were building the pipeline. That could we be considered as interfering.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Racmanaz wrote:

I believe it was levying sanctions on companies that were building the pipeline. That could we be considered as interfering.

Prove it.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Architect1776 wrote:

What interference was there?
What action was taken to interfere?

You don’t call america sanctions on anyone helping to build the pipeline. Interference??

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50875935

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Architect1776 wrote:

Prove it.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50875935

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

DennyT wrote:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50875935

That was Congress not Trump.
Yes, he signed it but the sanctions were from Congress.
Whether he signed it or not it would have gone into effect.
Perhaps interfering is wrong. Like interfering in WWI as all the beligrants were pretty much tapped out and the war would have ended shortly regardless of a democrat president getting involved
Now Trump has been proven right for signing it.
So you are correct America interfered and perhaps should not have.
But Europe is suffering for their stupidity.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

DennyT wrote:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50875935

Just curious, are you also opposed to America sending arms and funds to Ukraine to defend themselves from the Russian invasion?

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Architect1776 wrote:

That was Congress not Trump. br Yes, he signed it... (show quote)

I repeat - read carefully

“””” I ask again ( whether it’s the president, congress , democrats. Or republicans)
What right does. American have to interfere. In a pipe line between two sovereign
“”””

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

DennyT wrote:

I repeat - read carefully

“””” I ask again ( whether it’s the president, congress , democrats. Or republicans)
What right does. American have to interfere. In a pipe line between two sovereign
“”””

Easy, global and national security interest.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Racmanaz wrote:

Easy, global and national security interest.

National security ???? How ?

Global security ?? How

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

DennyT wrote:

National security ???? How ?

Global security ?? How

You're a former military man and you don't know this?

The Security Implications of Nord Stream 2 for Ukraine, Poland, and Germany

https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/security-implications-nord-stream-2-ukraine-poland-and-germany

U.S. deeply concerned Nord Stream gas link is security threat

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-gazprom-us-idUSKCN0XX1YG

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Racmanaz wrote:

You're a former military man and you don't know this?

The Security Implications of Nord Stream 2 for Ukraine, Poland, and Germany

https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/security-implications-nord-stream-2-ukraine-poland-and-germany

U.S. deeply concerned Nord Stream gas link is security threat

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-gazprom-us-idUSKCN0XX1YG

All bulls**t to support American militaristic hegonomy,

If we would mind our own business. We would be much better off.

The bottom line is this was deal between sovereign countries not America.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

DennyT wrote:

All bulls**t to support American militaristic hegonomy,

If we would mind our own business. We would be much better off

Well according to the U.S and many other European countries, you are wrong. What makes you right and all them wrong?

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Racmanaz wrote:

Well according to the U.S and many other European countries, you are wrong. What makes you right and all them wrong?

Bull
“””” The US sanctions have angered Russia and the European Unionwhich says it should be able to decide its own energy policies.

“”””
Earlier this week German Chancellor Angela Merkel said she was "opposed to extraterritorial sanctions"against the Nord Stream 2 project.

German foreign minister Heiko Maas struck a more combative tone, saying the sanctions amounted to "interference in autonomous decisions taken in Europe".

“”””
Wanna know what this was about - ?
Congress and their campaign contribution from American LNG companies.

“”””” The Trump administration fears the pipeline will tighten Russia's grip over Europe's energy supply and reduce its own share of the lucrative European market for American liquefied natural gas.
“”””

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50875935

Global or national security my a$$. That’s words for the gullible sheep!!

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

DennyT wrote:

Bull br “””” b The US sanctions have angered Russ... (show quote)

You appear to be wrong and ignorant, I think you really believe you're right on everything. Sorry but you're wrong and look what's happening now Russia's cutting off gas to Germany and the prices are going to rise. You Don't know Jack s***. You're such a Russian troll sympathizer.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Racmanaz wrote:

You appear to be wrong and ignorant, I think you really believe you're right on everything. Sorry but you're wrong and look what's happening now Russia's cutting off gas to Germany and the prices are going to rise. You Don't know Jack s***. You're such a Russian troll sympathizer.

I gave you back up !

Stupid at worst or just to stubborn to admit you’re wrong?
Which is it ?