Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Waterfall-Manual Aperture settings
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 4, 2012 18:17:19   #
ewiebe Loc: Vancouver Island
 
I'm preparing to demonstrate to a small group of photographers the use and advantages of going at least partially manual with the camera settings to set the"mood". Here are a few examples.
My camera is a Nikon 300s the lens a Nikon DX, AF-S Nikkor 35mm 1:1.8G.
I used a tripod, it was a cloudy day in a forest setting.
Settings #1:200 ISO f2.0 speed 1/160s(chosen by camera) 52mm.
#2:200 ISO f22 speed 1/3s (chosen by camera) 52 mm
#3:200 ISO f4.5 speed 1/20s (chosen by camera) 52mm
These are not meant to be award winning images, but on the other hand give me your critique, good and bad. What is your preferred setting?

Waterfall #1
Waterfall #1...

Waterfall #2
Waterfall #2...

Waterfall #3
Waterfall #3...

Reply
Nov 4, 2012 18:24:53   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Good teaching examples of different shutter durations creating different falling water effects.

I prefer your second image (1/3-second).

Reply
Nov 4, 2012 18:29:39   #
colo43 Loc: Eastern Plains of Colorado
 
The 3rd one for me..

Reply
 
 
Nov 4, 2012 18:51:34   #
jeanbug35 Loc: Jonesboro AR
 
The 3rd one for me.

Reply
Nov 4, 2012 20:10:27   #
Jay Pat Loc: Round Rock, Texas, USA
 
You have excellent examples!
Pat

Reply
Nov 4, 2012 20:19:15   #
Silver Fox Loc: Texas
 
All great shots by I personally like # 1 the natural look.

Reply
Nov 4, 2012 22:24:20   #
ewiebe Loc: Vancouver Island
 
Thank you for your responses.
I will state my opinion(s) of the three images that I've shown here. #1 with a fast shutter speed freezes the water motion and is probably the closest to what we actually see. It is sparkly and clear, but for me it stops all the dynamic of the falling water. It's nice but I'm moving to #2. This is a slow shutter speed and gives a soft dreamy impression. Very relaxing. We don't hear the sound of rushing, falling water which is not relaxing at all. On to #3 which is my favorite. It is a compromise but has my vote.
It is interesting that each sample above got at least one vote. That is good and indicates no right or wrong in many of the images we end up with but it is important that we as photographers know how to obtain that final great image that is just right for us.
I'll get off my soap box now.
Ed

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2012 00:22:28   #
LDM5 Loc: Templeton, MA
 
Well done. #2 gets my vote :thumbup:

Reply
Nov 5, 2012 02:04:29   #
Dixiegirl Loc: Alabama gulf coast
 
Very pretty photos. It's #2 for me, because I really like the silky water effect from slow shutter speed.

Reply
Nov 5, 2012 02:09:28   #
Horseart Loc: Alabama
 
ewiebe wrote:
I'm preparing to demonstrate to a small group of photographers the use and advantages of going at least partially manual with the camera settings to set the"mood". Here are a few examples.
My camera is a Nikon 300s the lens a Nikon DX, AF-S Nikkor 35mm 1:1.8G.
I used a tripod, it was a cloudy day in a forest setting.
Settings #1:200 ISO f2.0 speed 1/160s(chosen by camera) 52mm.
#2:200 ISO f22 speed 1/3s (chosen by camera) 52 mm
#3:200 ISO f4.5 speed 1/20s (chosen by camera) 52mm
These are not meant to be award winning images, but on the other hand give me your critique, good and bad. What is your preferred setting?
I'm preparing to demonstrate to a small group of p... (show quote)


I have always loved the natural look of moving water. The fast shutter speed show the splashes so beautifully. Th slow shutter speed makes water look milky and I'm not a fan of that, though it seems to be what everybody tries. Definitely #1 for me.

Reply
Nov 5, 2012 07:09:44   #
Beagleman Loc: Indiana
 
Definately No.1 it captures the real look. I can almost HEAR and FEEL the water in that one!

Beagleman

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2012 07:25:54   #
Dr. Danny Winbush Loc: On the beach
 
I am not a fan of the milk look and prefer #1. #3 is an ok compromise, IMHO.

Reply
Nov 5, 2012 07:43:43   #
skidooman Loc: Minnesota
 
3 is usually about where I try to get. I agree that it is a nice compromise.

Reply
Nov 5, 2012 07:45:58   #
molsonice Loc: Grand Blanc, MI
 
#2, it is too bad you moved the camera during the shot as this could of made a very interesting HDR photo. Very nice setting and pics.

Reply
Nov 5, 2012 09:18:06   #
jjadeco25 Loc: Alma, AR
 
I like #1 the best. It makes me feel like I am there with the rush of the water. It's a very natural look.
# 3 is my second best. It's kind of a combo of 1 & 2.

Bushkill Falls, PA
Bushkill Falls, PA...

Bushkill Falls, PA
Bushkill Falls, PA...

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.