Sony A7RII or RX100VII (Page 5): Just got back from 3 weeks out West. I took my RX100VII and my Sony RX10M4. I never used the M4. We’re going to Germany this Christmas and I’m taking...

markwilliam1

SteveG wrote:

We're planning a trip to Portugal next year and I'm debating whether to take my full frame or my compact. What would you take with you? If it is the full frame, then is their one lens you would take with you? (I have a 28-60mm, 16-35mm). Or, is the Sony rx100vii sufficient for a trip to Europe? Looking forward to hearing your opinions!

Just got back from 3 weeks out West. I took my RX100VII and my Sony RX10M4. I never used the M4. We’re going to Germany this Christmas and I’m taking the VII. It’s such a Wonderful camera that should suit you needs Perfectly Plus you can put it in your pocket!

SteveG Loc: Norh Carolina

markwilliam1 wrote:

Just got back from 3 weeks out West. I took my RX100VII and my Sony RX10M4. I never used the M4. We’re going to Germany this Christmas and I’m taking the VII. It’s such a Wonderful camera that should suit you needs Perfectly Plus you can put it in your pocket!

👍👍👍

azted Loc: Las Vegas, NV.

gwilliams6 wrote:

I agree with Zug55 here. I have owned Sony A6500, ... (show quote)

Yes, this is a BS question! Of course you take both, and utilize that which is best for the occasion. For street photography, etc. you have the RX, and for landscape you have the A7R. This type of thread makes me crazy. Take both pieces of equipment and be an artist!

SteveG Loc: Norh Carolina

azted wrote:

Yes, this is a BS question! Of course you take both, and utilize that which is best for the occasion. For street photography, etc. you have the RX, and for landscape you have the A7R. This type of thread makes me crazy. Take both pieces of equipment and be an artist!

What drives ME crazy are those of you that respond like yourself. I'm getting older and don't get around quite as well as I used to. I am seeking others experience with their similar equipment and how they faired. Up to this point the discussion has been excellent and I have been able to reach a tentative solution without anyone being driven crazy by the topic. If it drives you so crazy, change the channel. Your "contribution" to the discussion is the BS.

azted Loc: Las Vegas, NV.

SteveG wrote:

What drives ME crazy are those of you that respond like yourself. I'm getting older and don't get around quite as well as I used to. I am seeking others experience with their similar equipment and how they faired. Up to this point the discussion has been excellent and I have been able to reach a tentative solution without anyone being driven crazy by the topic. If it drives you so crazy, change the channel. Your "contribution" to the discussion is the BS.

I took the time to read almost all of the posts. Everyone has an opinion, of which you asked for. If you don't like my opinion, then don't take it. But this is not exactly high level decision making, is it?

Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak

Hi, Steve. I know I’m coming into this thread a bit late, but here’s my 2 cents. I would recommend the RX100M7. I have that camera and love it. I took it on a cruise we went on a couple years ago, and it performed flawlessly and I never felt that I needed anything wider or longer. The lens is superb and images turned out sharp and clear. Just be careful when you shoot tall buildings close up as it tends to result in some convergence toward the top, or to tilt a little. This can be rectified in post, though. I found the M7 to be light, easy to use and unobtrusive. It’s not a simple point and shoot camera as it has almost all the controls and features that your A7R2 has. Carrying the RX100M7 allows you to carry a small light camera in a pocket or belt pouch instead of a heavy full frame camera and lens plus a second lens. I appreciated the lack of weight on that trip, and I was satisfied with the results. I think, for a travel camera, it’s pretty hard to beat the RX100M7.

SteveG Loc: Norh Carolina

azted wrote:

I took the time to read almost all of the posts. Everyone has an opinion, of which you asked for. If you don't like my opinion, then don't take it. But this is not exactly high level decision making, is it?

Is ANYTHING here "high level" decision making??? You're just one of the grouches here on The Hog and why I don't post more often. Sorry, my point of discussion doesn't reach your high level of intelligence.

SteveG Loc: Norh Carolina

Wingpilot wrote:

Hi, Steve. I know I’m coming into this thread a b... (show quote)

Thanks for your input. I have time to do some comparison work before we go. A year later, and a year older, may end up having me decide to go with just the Rx. 10-20 years ago I wouldn't give this question a thought for carrying the equipment wouldn't be an issue. But it's becoming one. You, and everyone else, have been quite helpful. Thanks again!

Rick from NY Loc: Sarasota FL

Pittsburgher wrote:

…..My main concern is the difficulty in easily adjusting shutter speed/aperture/ISO and focus mode. In Auto, it handles nicely and produces good results…..

I agree that changing the RX 100 settings is not all that easy, partly because the buttons are so tiny and partly because the Sony menu system is notoriously hard to master. But I’ve been able to mitigate the issue to some degree by utilizing the fn button which is customizable and puts 12 most used adjustments in grid along bottom of screen. You also have a generous amount of other customizable buttons available. I’ve become more adapt at adjustments on it, but no question that I can adjust everything faster with my Nikon D850 due more to muscle memory more than anything else.

As with any piece of gear, familiarizing yourself with how it works should be done before embarking on a shoot.

wmurnahan Loc: Bloomington IN

For ease of travel, the RX100 gives you everything you will need and slips into a pocket. I find the shots from mine hold up very well against shots from my FF a7ii when printed at 9x13.

SteveG Loc: Norh Carolina

Rick from NY wrote:

I agree that changing the RX 100 settings is not a... (show quote)

Definitely! I've been doing just that. The Fn button definitely helps

rcarol

CHG_CANON wrote:

A photographer brings their camera.

Very Insightful.

Rick from NY Loc: Sarasota FL

Just thought of one other negative with the RX100 that affects me, but might not others. I am a right eye shooter and since the rear screen is a touch screen, when I put my eye to the finder, my nose moves the focus point all over the place. Or, depending on how the touch screen is configured, my nose may trip shutter or do something else. Since I like to use adjustable (moveable) focus spot, I disable the rear screen touch feature. Not sure if you are a more traditional left eye shooter, there would be a problem

SteveG Loc: Norh Carolina

wmurnahan wrote:

For ease of travel, the RX100 gives you everything you will need and slips into a pocket. I find the shots from mine hold up very well against shots from my FF a7ii when printed at 9x13.

THAT is exactly what I want to know. The A7rII has more resolution but I have to do my own comparisons. Thanks so much!

Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak

Rick from NY wrote:

Just thought of one other negative with the RX100 ... (show quote)

I am a left eye shooter and haven’t had that issue, but then I disabled the touch screen feature anyway.