Forget Russia, Russia, Russia. It is now FBI, FBI, FBI
Yep, the FBI kept that information from the general public. There's a big conflict of interest with that laptop and Joe Biden, so yes, they did interfere. Because of the honesty of the right leaning news sources, the conservatives knew the laptop was indeed H****r's and that the left was being deceitful.
And now we are supposed to believe that the raid on Trump was legit???!!!
The FBI has zero credibility. They are corrupt at the very top. I believe there are good agents but the top brass are supporting a political agenda and not the rule of law.
LinksUp wrote:
And now we are supposed to believe that the raid on Trump was legit???!!!
The FBI has zero credibility. They are corrupt at the very top. I believe there are good agents but the top brass are supporting a political agenda and not the rule of law.
Do you even know the fact that the person at the very top of the FBI, Director Christopher Bray, was appointed by Donald Trump?
gorgehiker wrote:
Do you even know the fact that the person at the very top of the FBI, Director Christopher Bray, was appointed by Donald Trump?
So? Is that supposed to mean something? BTW his name is Chris Wray.
Blurryeyed wrote:
So? Is that supposed to mean something? BTW his name is Chris Wray.
Sorry about the typo. I was responding to Links who stated that the FBI is corrupt at the top. I guess that means that Links believes that Trump appointed a corrupt director of the FBI.
gorgehiker wrote:
Sorry about the typo. I was responding to Links who stated that the FBI is corrupt at the top. I guess that means that Links believes that Trump appointed a corrupt director of the FBI.
I don't know or believe anything about Wray. All I know is what I can see. And right now I see corruption.
LinksUp wrote:
I don't know or believe anything about Wray. All I know is what I can see. And right now I see corruption.
What is corrupt about recovering
STOLEN US Government documents from Mar-A-Lago?
If the shoe was on the other foot, and it was a Democrat who had stolen this many physical documents from the Federal Government which the FBI needed to recover, would you be
whining that the FBI was corrupt for serving a Search Warrant and recovering boxes upon boxes of stolen documents?
By the way, a simple Google search shows that Christopher Wray was nominated by trump on June 7, 2017, then he was confirmed and sworn in on August 1, 2017.
Here's a link to the redacted affidavit which resulted in the Search Warrant being issued.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22267187-affidavit-malTell us all, what in that affidavit is corrupt?
gorgehiker wrote:
Do you even know the fact that the person at the very top of the FBI, Director Christopher Bray, was appointed by Donald Trump?
do you even know the fact that money talks??? do you think he would still have his job if he refused the orders by Biden/Obama to raid the house????
wilpharm wrote:
do you even know the fact that money talks??? do you think he would still have his job if he refused the orders by Biden/Obama to raid the house????
Your comment reminded me of comments of conversations at our bourbon party last night. In a deep red state, you can imagine how far right the guests were and one of them commented on Clinton/Obama being Biden’s Puppeteers. My follow up was whether there was more proof that Biden is dancing to Sinema/Manchin? They admitted to no proof of the Clinton/Obama claim — just “common sense” and a “feeling” and agreed that Sinema/Manchin have the power. One small sign of moving the dialogue back to the facts and not about unproven conspiracy theories. Have another bourbon.
Triple G wrote:
Your comment reminded me of comments of conversations at our bourbon party last night. In a deep red state, you can imagine how far right the guests were and one of them commented on Clinton/Obama being Biden’s Puppeteers. My follow up was whether there was more proof that Biden is dancing to Sinema/Manchin? They admitted to no proof of the Clinton/Obama claim — just “common sense” and a “feeling” and agreed that Sinema/Manchin have the power. One small sign of moving the dialogue back to the facts and not about unproven conspiracy theories. Have another bourbon.
Your comment reminded me of comments of conversati... (
show quote)
you have no proof otherwise..sounds like you had 3 or 4 too many bourbons...
wilpharm wrote:
you have no proof otherwise..sounds like you had 3 or 4 too many bourbons...
You certainly have no proof either. I can point to the number of times Sinema/Manchin were able to rework the bills toward the right. My audience agreed so all is good.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.