Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Astronomical Photography Forum
Shooting solar with a CaK blocking filter
Aug 8, 2022 15:34:03   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
This is something that I recently started shooting and I have been very pleased with the results.
This is shooting in the 3900nm range or ultraviolet.
I use a Lunt 102mm doublet telescope with a Lunt CaK 1200 blocking filter.
Images are captured with a Skyris 236M CMOS camera.
I shot 20 second videos, usually at 30 - 60 frames per second depending on the resolution I am shooting.
I stack 10% of the captured video with autostakkert3 and process the stacked photo in Photoshop adding color back into the image.
I have to focus with the laptop because most people cannot see details of CaK directly. I see a purple circle lacking detail but it becomes very clear on screen.
I’ll post my photo train and a resulting photo.
Stay safe.

This is the setup I use
This is the setup I use...
(Download)

This is a final photo
This is a final photo...
(Download)

Reply
Aug 9, 2022 09:36:55   #
JBRIII
 
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
This is something that I recently started shooting and I have been very pleased with the results.
This is shooting in the 3900nm range or ultraviolet.
I use a Lunt 102mm doublet telescope with a Lunt CaK 1200 blocking filter.
Images are captured with a Skyris 236M CMOS camera.
I shot 20 second videos, usually at 30 - 60 frames per second depending on the resolution I am shooting.
I stack 10% of the captured video with autostakkert3 and process the stacked photo in Photoshop adding color back into the image.
I have to focus with the laptop because most people cannot see details of CaK directly. I see a purple circle lacking detail but it becomes very clear on screen.
I’ll post my photo train and a resulting photo.
Stay safe.
This is something that I recently started shooting... (show quote)


Minor PT 390 nm, too many 0's.

Reply
Aug 9, 2022 10:25:58   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
JBRIII wrote:
Minor PT 390 nm, too many 0's.


Correct, I missed that in my editing.
Thank you.
Jim

Reply
 
 
Aug 9, 2022 11:50:52   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
This is something that I recently started shooting and I have been very pleased with the results.
This is shooting in the 3900nm range or ultraviolet.
I use a Lunt 102mm doublet telescope with a Lunt CaK 1200 blocking filter.
Images are captured with a Skyris 236M CMOS camera.
I shot 20 second videos, usually at 30 - 60 frames per second depending on the resolution I am shooting.
I stack 10% of the captured video with autostakkert3 and process the stacked photo in Photoshop adding color back into the image.
I have to focus with the laptop because most people cannot see details of CaK directly. I see a purple circle lacking detail but it becomes very clear on screen.
I’ll post my photo train and a resulting photo.
Stay safe.
This is something that I recently started shooting... (show quote)

Very nice! The filter does an excellent job on contrast.

bwa

Reply
Aug 9, 2022 15:19:11   #
profbowman Loc: Harrisonburg, VA, USA
 
Looks very good, Jim.

On some reading I have done, they suggested that one can view the granulations just below the Sun's surface in this near uv light. Have you seen anything like that? Is this an exceptionally large sunspot, or is the upper shadow from the lens/lens tube? --Richard

Reply
Aug 10, 2022 00:30:54   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
profbowman wrote:
Looks very good, Jim.

On some reading I have done, they suggested that one can view the granulations just below the Sun's surface in this near uv light. Have you seen anything like that? Is this an exceptionally large sunspot, or is the upper shadow from the lens/lens tube? --Richard


This is the actual area. This is all that fits in the image. I have to shoot the sun in 6 pieces and stitch to get a full image with this setup.
Jim

Reply
Aug 10, 2022 00:32:16   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
bwana wrote:
Very nice! The filter does an excellent job on contrast.

bwa


Thank you.
I wasn’t sure if I would like this but it sure pulls the detail.
Jim

Reply
 
 
Aug 10, 2022 08:54:17   #
profbowman Loc: Harrisonburg, VA, USA
 
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
This is the actual area. This is all that fits in the image. I have to shoot the sun in 6 pieces and stitch to get a full image with this setup.
Jim


Thanks, Jim. I thought that might be the case. --Richard

Reply
Aug 11, 2022 12:20:17   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
Here is the stitched image.
Yep those spots are pretty large.
It creates a pretty large file and this has been reduced a bit.
Jim

Here’s a blurb from the Lunt description of the filter spectrum.

“The Calcium K modules line is centered at 393.4 nm. This wavelength is considered to be slightly outside the visible spectrum on the UV side. While most people can visually see the violet color of the wavelength, many cannot resolve the contrast due to yellowing of the cornea. People who have had cataract surgery are often able to see considerable detail. But, it is for these reasons that the Ca-K line is typically studied via the use of cameras, which are able to provide stunning details.“


(Download)

Reply
Aug 11, 2022 13:55:29   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Here is the stitched image.
Yep those spots are pretty large.
It creates a pretty large file and this has been reduced a bit.
Jim

Here’s a blurb from the Lunt description of the filter spectrum.

“The Calcium K modules line is centered at 393.4 nm. This wavelength is considered to be slightly outside the visible spectrum on the UV side. While most people can visually see the violet color of the wavelength, many cannot resolve the contrast due to yellowing of the cornea. People who have had cataract surgery are often able to see considerable detail. But, it is for these reasons that the Ca-K line is typically studied via the use of cameras, which are able to provide stunning details.“
Here is the stitched image. br Yep those spots ar... (show quote)

Great image!

Reply
Aug 13, 2022 07:11:52   #
profbowman Loc: Harrisonburg, VA, USA
 
Thanks for stitching images together and posting the result, Jim. It looks good. --Richard

Reply
 
 
Aug 13, 2022 17:11:36   #
Ballard Loc: Grass Valley, California
 
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
This is something that I recently started shooting and I have been very pleased with the results.
This is shooting in the 3900nm range or ultraviolet.
I use a Lunt 102mm doublet telescope with a Lunt CaK 1200 blocking filter.
Images are captured with a Skyris 236M CMOS camera.
I shot 20 second videos, usually at 30 - 60 frames per second depending on the resolution I am shooting.
I stack 10% of the captured video with autostakkert3 and process the stacked photo in Photoshop adding color back into the image.
I have to focus with the laptop because most people cannot see details of CaK directly. I see a purple circle lacking detail but it becomes very clear on screen.
I’ll post my photo train and a resulting photo.
Stay safe.
This is something that I recently started shooting... (show quote)


Very nice Calcium K-line shots. How narrow band is your filter, does it cover both the K and H lines?

Reply
Aug 17, 2022 13:33:38   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
Ballard wrote:
Very nice Calcium K-line shots. How narrow band is your filter, does it cover both the K and H lines?


Thank you for your compliment.

H and K are close to the 393.4nm wavelength. The Lunt filter is specific to K line.
H is lower and is sometimes captured with less specific filters like Daystar.
I hope this answers your question.

Reply
Aug 17, 2022 13:37:16   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
bwana wrote:
Great image!


Thank you very much.
It’s an expensive filter but very well made.
I wasn’t sure if it was something I was going to use a lot but it’s becoming a favorite.
Stay safe

Reply
Aug 17, 2022 13:40:24   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
profbowman wrote:
Thanks for stitching images together and posting the result, Jim. It looks good. --Richard


Thank you very much for the compliment.
The Skyris 236 series does a great job of capturing but the sensor is small. I just have to capture more photons to get a full image.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Astronomical Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.