Help to correct iso mistake
Aug 5, 2022 14:04:01 #
profbowman wrote:
Charlie, I thought I would have some fun working with your image with simple tools available in IrfanView. I got rid of noise with a "Blur" and "Median filter," increased the contrast, and "sharpened" the final image and at a few points in between. I kept it a bit larger than most of the other trials if that is important to you.
I loved the photo. Thanks for the fun. --Richard
I loved the photo. Thanks for the fun. --Richard
Thanks Richard. I appreciate the comment as well as the edit of the photo.
Chuck
Aug 5, 2022 14:07:33 #
Aug 5, 2022 15:27:41 #
Aug 5, 2022 15:40:47 #
charlienow wrote:
What a difference Boone. What software did you use
Chuck
Chuck
I used ON1 2022.5
Aug 5, 2022 16:34:14 #
Aug 5, 2022 16:56:50 #
TheShoe
Loc: Lacey, WA
This has very minor changes (slight increase in contrast and microcontrast, exposure -.97, slight deepening of Blacks) done in DxO. In addition, I turned off DxO's Noise Reduction.
Aug 5, 2022 17:58:08 #
TheShoe wrote:
This has very minor changes (slight increase in contrast and microcontrast, exposure -.97, slight deepening of Blacks) done in DxO. In addition, I turned off DxO's Noise Reduction.
Thanks Shoe. I don’t believe I will be using DxO. Your exit looks good.
Chuck
Aug 5, 2022 18:00:14 #
Orphoto wrote:
How much of this is noise and how much of it is artifacts/loss contrast from shooting through glass/plastic/screen door?
I shot Thru a steel mesh screen that are maybe 6” square. It was not Thru a mesh
Aug 6, 2022 01:45:44 #
Boone wrote:
I used ON1 2022.5
And you produced by far the best yet!!!
Loren - in Beautiful Baguio City
Aug 6, 2022 10:33:44 #
I hate fluctuating ISO. I set mine to the camera's lowest setting and lock it there. If I want to raise it, I can. I've been playing around with my Z fc, and when it's on Auto, it doesn't mind going up to 12,500 ISO. I still get good pictures, but naturally, there's noise, especially when I zoom in.
Aug 6, 2022 11:39:37 #
jerryc41 wrote:
I hate fluctuating ISO. I set mine to the camera's lowest setting and lock it there. If I want to raise it, I can. I've been playing around with my Z fc, and when it's on Auto, it doesn't mind going up to 12,500 ISO. I still get good pictures, but naturally, there's noise, especially when I zoom in.
I usually keep mine locked on something below 1000. I had been playing with high iso and just forgot to lower it to something more acceptable.
Aug 6, 2022 13:50:59 #
TheShoe
Loc: Lacey, WA
charlienow wrote:
Thanks Shoe. I don’t believe I will be using DxO. Your exit looks good.
Chuck
Chuck
I wasn't trying to proselytize. Rather, I listed the adjustments I made that were simple ones that can be made with almost any photo processing s/w.
Aug 7, 2022 02:29:05 #
rlv567 wrote:
Here's a really quick pass through ON1 - only.
Loren - in Beautiful Baguio City
Loren - in Beautiful Baguio City
😳
That’s hurts my eyes!
Aug 7, 2022 02:37:43 #
rlv567 wrote:
As you should know, I could have done it with less sharpening, but that's the way I like it - not the dull, foggy version!!! I do understand that some prefer it that way, but not I. I have seen that view expressed here a number of times previously by others, but I prefer sharp, vivid pictures unless blur and fogginess are called for by the nature of the shot, or that which the photographer wishes to convey.
Loren - in Beautiful Baguio City
Loren - in Beautiful Baguio City
It’s not just the over sharpening. The colors are garish and you also sharpened and increased contrast in the background and totally destroyed what little DOF separation that was in the original.
Aug 7, 2022 02:39:53 #
Boone wrote:
I used ON1 2022.5
Now that I’ve seen results from two people using ON1 I’m happy I haven’t invested in it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.