Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Internet speed
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Jul 19, 2022 19:30:10   #
SX2002 Loc: Adelaide, South Australia
 
How do these figures compare with what you are getting...I reckon these speeds are pretty good from what others have told me they get...
I thought I'd check because having the same speeds pretty much every day, this site (UHH) seems to run quite slow at times...I notice it especially when I open "Newest Pictures" each page is quite slow to load.


(Download)

Reply
Jul 19, 2022 20:09:19   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
I get 66.5 down and 11.8 up.
But we're not paying for premium speeds.
The 66 down is fine for what we do. I don't see an abhorrent delay loading pages here.
I don't notice any great delay updating my website or sending images, which I don't do a lot.
But everyone's needs and expectations are different.

Reply
Jul 19, 2022 20:35:16   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
SX2002 wrote:
How do these figures compare with what you are getting...I reckon these speeds are pretty good from what others have told me they get...
I thought I'd check because having the same speeds pretty much every day, this site (UHH) seems to run quite slow at times...I notice it especially when I open "Newest Pictures" each page is quite slow to load.


On a good day, around 123 Mbps download and 11.8 Mbps upload. Spectrum. Supposedly we're on a 200 Mbps plan, but our old cable modem probably limits it. (We own the modem.)

I just checked. 120 down and 11.6 up. That's over 5GHz WiFi through a ceiling and a wall or two. The 2.4 GHz channel is running 68 down and 10.6 up.

Reply
 
 
Jul 19, 2022 20:41:18   #
NickGee Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
SX2002 wrote:
How do these figures compare with what you are getting...I reckon these speeds are pretty good from what others have told me they get...
I thought I'd check because having the same speeds pretty much every day, this site (UHH) seems to run quite slow at times...I notice it especially when I open "Newest Pictures" each page is quite slow to load.


Your large upload speed seems peculiar, as I, like most, get about 12 (which is usually adequate for upload). What provider do you use? I have an insanely large pipeline as there's a lot going on in the house at any one time. Likely overkill, but hey, speed kills :)



Reply
Jul 19, 2022 20:58:46   #
SX2002 Loc: Adelaide, South Australia
 
NickGee wrote:
Your large upload speed seems peculiar, as I, like most, get about 12 (which is usually adequate for upload). What provider do you use? I have an insanely large pipeline as there's a lot going on in the house at any one time. Likely overkill, but hey, speed kills :)


Escapenet, a local company that uses the NBN (National Broadband Network) I like the fast upload...

Reply
Jul 19, 2022 21:17:22   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
NickGee wrote:
Your large upload speed seems peculiar, as I, like most, get about 12 (which is usually adequate for upload). What provider do you use? I have an insanely large pipeline as there's a lot going on in the house at any one time. Likely overkill, but hey, speed kills :)


The guy is in South Australia…

Reply
Jul 19, 2022 21:20:53   #
NickGee Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
burkphoto wrote:
The guy is in South Australia…


Yes, I see that now. Well, I guess if you're upside down .... :)

Reply
 
 
Jul 19, 2022 21:22:50   #
TonyP Loc: New Zealand
 
SX2002 wrote:
How do these figures compare with what you are getting...I reckon these speeds are pretty good from what others have told me they get...
I thought I'd check because having the same speeds pretty much every day, this site (UHH) seems to run quite slow at times...I notice it especially when I open "Newest Pictures" each page is quite slow to load.


Looks a bit slow compared to what I get here.
UHH always loads pretty quickly. I use Firefox as browser if thats relevant.


(Download)

Reply
Jul 19, 2022 21:33:15   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
TonyP wrote:
Looks a bit slow compared to what I get here.
UHH always loads pretty quickly. I use Firefox as browser if thats relevant.

Cool!

Reply
Jul 19, 2022 22:07:40   #
SX2002 Loc: Adelaide, South Australia
 
TonyP wrote:
Looks a bit slow compared to what I get here.
UHH always loads pretty quickly. I use Firefox as browser if thats relevant.


That's incredibly fast Tony...

Reply
Jul 19, 2022 22:08:29   #
SX2002 Loc: Adelaide, South Australia
 
NickGee wrote:
Yes, I see that now. Well, I guess if you're upside down .... :)


And your point is...??

Reply
 
 
Jul 19, 2022 22:12:10   #
NickGee Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
SX2002 wrote:
And your point is...??


No point. Just wisecrackin'.

Reply
Jul 19, 2022 22:24:04   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Unfortunately, the best Spectrum can provide for me is 200 down and 10 up, and it benchmarks at almost exactly that. Before Spectrum bought TWC (Time Warner cable), I had 200 down and 100 up over the same link. No clue why Spectrum changed the upload, but I’m REALLY glad I did the initial “seeding” of my Amazon S3 cloud account before the change, because now it’s dog slow uploading new data - I just start it as a background task and let it run all night if necessary. Google Fibre is only a few blocks away, but not sure if they’re willing to trench up my 500’ driveway to install the Fibre. It’s symmetrical Gbit (1,000 up and down), but even if I can get it, my wife and I would lose our Roadrunner email addresses (which we’ve had since the beginning of email) unless we pay for both, and that’s a BIG issue for us (my wife has had her account so long it’s just her first name@…).

Reply
Jul 19, 2022 22:55:58   #
TonyP Loc: New Zealand
 
SX2002 wrote:
That's incredibly fast Tony...


Yeah, compared to what I see in this thread..
Most of New Zealand is on fibre optic cable now for telephones/data. Urban areas anyway. Being domestic useage we have just the normal least cost plan, businesses have faster. During the night is when I do any loads to my website, not very often I must say, but when I do the big files move incredibly fast, compared to when we were on copper cable.

Reply
Jul 19, 2022 22:59:50   #
TonyP Loc: New Zealand
 
TriX wrote:
Unfortunately, the best Spectrum can provide for me is 200 down and 10 up, and it benchmarks at almost exactly that. Before Spectrum bought TWC (Time Warner cable), I had 200 down and 100 up over the same link. No clue why Spectrum changed the upload, but I’m REALLY glad I did the initial “seeding” of my Amazon S3 cloud account before the change, because now it’s dog slow uploading new data - I just start it as a background task and let it run all night if necessary. Google Fibre is only a few blocks away, but not sure if they’re willing to trench up my 500’ driveway to install the Fibre. It’s symmetrical Gbit (1,000 up and down), but even if I can get it, my wife and I would lose our Roadrunner email addresses (which we’ve had since the beginning of email) unless we pay for both, and that’s a BIG issue for us (my wife has had her account so long it’s just her first name@…).
Unfortunately, the best Spectrum can provide for m... (show quote)


Your email conundrum is why we had to change to GMail when fibre optic started to roll out around New Zealand. That way we could shift our provider plan to the cheapest whenever they started to offer 'deals'. But it was a hassle for awhile until everyone had our updated GMail address. Now we can change providers without any problems.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.