GoofyNewfie wrote:
Yes, but it’s heavier, more expensive and isn't as wide on the short end.
On the wide end, 6 millimeters makes a bigger difference than the long end.
About three years ago, I bought a 24-120 mm f/4 as a "sometimes alternative" to my 17-55 mm f/2.8. It's a little smaller and lighter, but it is much more agile. It has become the predominant lens on my D500. I find that I rarely miss the 7mm when using the 24-120. Its always possible to shoot a quick three-shot panorama, if necessary. It just depends on how and what you shoot.