Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Follow the science! vs Learn to count
Jul 5, 2022 11:29:20   #
hondo812 Loc: Massachusetts
 
Interesting thing landed in my inbox today. It seems that the CDC, that paragon of virtue and settled science has forgotten how to do something even 2nd grader do....count.

https://ijr.com/flashback-you-were-right-cdc-admits-their-c***d-numbers-are-off-by-tens-of-thousands/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flashback: You Were Right - CDC Admits Their C***D Numbers Are Off by Tens of Thousands
By Richard Bledsoe, The Western Journal July 3, 2022 at 2:50pm

The last few years demonstrated the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have not given Americans any reason to trust it.

The latest long-delayed revelation only reinforces suspicions the CDC failed to provide the due diligence required in the complex mix of medicine and politics C***d became.

In yet another credibility-damaging admission, in June the CDC changed the statistics of fatalities from C****-**. The embattled agency revealed it had over-calculated the C***d ** death count by more than 72,000.

As reported in the Daily Wire, the revision was made to 26 states, across all age groups. The CDC chalked up claims of 72, 277 extra C***D fatalities to a “coding logic error.”

The CDC now claims 969,000 died from C****-**. The adjustments represent about a 7.5 percent decrease in the currently reported fatalities.

It is unclear if the current accepted death count will be subject to even more revisions.

The article notes the CDC altered the C***d death counts months ago. The Daily Wire’s Mairead Elordi stated “that back in August, the data on C***D deaths was changed after they identified a data discrepancy.”
For some reason, it is only being reported now.

It was even more impactful on the reporting on kids. “The huge change in the pediatric death count drops the estimate of C***D deaths in children down to 1,341 nationwide. Children were about 19 percent of all C***D cases but only about a quarter of a percent of those cases were fatal,” said Elordi.

It’s peculiar how the CDC’s mishaps always add intensity to the threat levels from C***D, rather than diminish them.

This wasn’t the only recent revision. In March, the CDC admitted erroneous figures were used to boost the fear factor regarding pediatric C***D deaths. After the late adjustment in March , the claimed fatalities for C***D patients under the age of 18 fell a stunning 24 percent.

The explanation for the misleading data? Also a “coding logic error.”

After finding that massive mistake, a proactive and responsible agency would review all its reporting immediately. Yet months later, significant retractions are still trickling out.

The March pediatric correction came only after the wise Latina Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor took the CDC’s exaggerations and ran with them. Sotomayor added her own disinformation to the C***d narrative during a January hearing, when she falsely claimed 100,000 children were hospitalized with C***d, many on ventilators.

Even the CDC’s recommendations on v*****es are subject to sudden shifts. In February, they upped the gap between C***d v*****es doses to eight weeks to cut down on cases of the potentially lethal side effect of myocarditis.

A proactive and responsible agency would take much stronger action than that toward an experimental v*****e.
Also in February, the CDC was blasted for its lack of t***sparency. Experts questioned why the CDC had shared so little of the information it collected. The CDC claimed providing information would only feed disinformation. Critics noted the opposite was true, and wondered what the CDC was trying to hide.

Many have suspected the CDC was inflating the C***d numbers. The CDC’s own admissions prove the skeptics were right.

If the CDC confesses they were off by tens of thousands, it is reasonable to believe the miscounts are even worse than they admit.

By using the coding logic error excuse, the CDC hoped to hide behind bureaucratic blundering. It’s an easy explanation for the way they manipulated the public.

The CDC’s mission these days seems to be the control and prevention of the release of information regarding the CDC’s missteps and malpractice.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply
Jul 5, 2022 12:38:40   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
hondo812 wrote:
Interesting thing landed in my inbox today. It seems that the CDC, that paragon of virtue and settled science has forgotten how to do something even 2nd grader do....count.

https://ijr.com/flashback-you-were-right-cdc-admits-their-c***d-numbers-are-off-by-tens-of-thousands/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flashback: You Were Right - CDC Admits Their C***D Numbers Are Off by Tens of Thousands
By Richard Bledsoe, The Western Journal July 3, 2022 at 2:50pm

The last few years demonstrated the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have not given Americans any reason to trust it.

The latest long-delayed revelation only reinforces suspicions the CDC failed to provide the due diligence required in the complex mix of medicine and politics C***d became.

In yet another credibility-damaging admission, in June the CDC changed the statistics of fatalities from C****-**. The embattled agency revealed it had over-calculated the C***d ** death count by more than 72,000.

As reported in the Daily Wire, the revision was made to 26 states, across all age groups. The CDC chalked up claims of 72, 277 extra C***D fatalities to a “coding logic error.”

The CDC now claims 969,000 died from C****-**. The adjustments represent about a 7.5 percent decrease in the currently reported fatalities.

It is unclear if the current accepted death count will be subject to even more revisions.

The article notes the CDC altered the C***d death counts months ago. The Daily Wire’s Mairead Elordi stated “that back in August, the data on C***D deaths was changed after they identified a data discrepancy.”
For some reason, it is only being reported now.

It was even more impactful on the reporting on kids. “The huge change in the pediatric death count drops the estimate of C***D deaths in children down to 1,341 nationwide. Children were about 19 percent of all C***D cases but only about a quarter of a percent of those cases were fatal,” said Elordi.

It’s peculiar how the CDC’s mishaps always add intensity to the threat levels from C***D, rather than diminish them.

This wasn’t the only recent revision. In March, the CDC admitted erroneous figures were used to boost the fear factor regarding pediatric C***D deaths. After the late adjustment in March , the claimed fatalities for C***D patients under the age of 18 fell a stunning 24 percent.

The explanation for the misleading data? Also a “coding logic error.”

After finding that massive mistake, a proactive and responsible agency would review all its reporting immediately. Yet months later, significant retractions are still trickling out.

The March pediatric correction came only after the wise Latina Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor took the CDC’s exaggerations and ran with them. Sotomayor added her own disinformation to the C***d narrative during a January hearing, when she falsely claimed 100,000 children were hospitalized with C***d, many on ventilators.

Even the CDC’s recommendations on v*****es are subject to sudden shifts. In February, they upped the gap between C***d v*****es doses to eight weeks to cut down on cases of the potentially lethal side effect of myocarditis.

A proactive and responsible agency would take much stronger action than that toward an experimental v*****e.
Also in February, the CDC was blasted for its lack of t***sparency. Experts questioned why the CDC had shared so little of the information it collected. The CDC claimed providing information would only feed disinformation. Critics noted the opposite was true, and wondered what the CDC was trying to hide.

Many have suspected the CDC was inflating the C***d numbers. The CDC’s own admissions prove the skeptics were right.

If the CDC confesses they were off by tens of thousands, it is reasonable to believe the miscounts are even worse than they admit.

By using the coding logic error excuse, the CDC hoped to hide behind bureaucratic blundering. It’s an easy explanation for the way they manipulated the public.

The CDC’s mission these days seems to be the control and prevention of the release of information regarding the CDC’s missteps and malpractice.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting thing landed in my inbox today. It see... (show quote)


We all knew that.
And even the adjusted numbers are false I bet.

Reply
Jul 5, 2022 15:50:51   #
btbg
 
Architect1776 wrote:
We all knew that.
And even the adjusted numbers are false I bet.


You can virtually guarantee that the adjusted numbers are still high. Remember, the adjustment involves only 26 states. That leaves 24 where they still haven't made any adjustments. And, we don't yet know which states they have changed, whether it is states with high population numbers or not. It would not be unreasonable to see the numbers drop by at least another 70,000, and that still does not account for those who entered the hospital for something else, died with c***d and were put on the c***d list even though the other ailment actually k**led them.

We shut down countless businesses, helped cause inflation, and tried to scare everyone. Now, the data shows that the high schools and colleges that are forcing young people to get v******ted have done so based on a lie as the young have virtually no risk from the v***s, yet have substantial risk from the v*****e as proved by the CDC now changing the amount of time between v*****es to lower the risk of a dangerous heart condition caused by the v*****e. High school and college students have less chance of dying from the v***s than from the v*****e, yet it is still not only being recommended, the military and most colleges are requiring it. Shame on the CDC and shame on F***i.

Reply
 
 
Jul 6, 2022 14:21:45   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
hondo812 wrote:
Interesting thing landed in my inbox today. It seems that the CDC, that paragon of virtue and settled science has forgotten how to do something even 2nd grader do....count.

https://ijr.com/flashback-you-were-right-cdc-admits-their-c***d-numbers-are-off-by-tens-of-thousands/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flashback: You Were Right - CDC Admits Their C***D Numbers Are Off by Tens of Thousands
By Richard Bledsoe, The Western Journal July 3, 2022 at 2:50pm

The last few years demonstrated the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have not given Americans any reason to trust it.

The latest long-delayed revelation only reinforces suspicions the CDC failed to provide the due diligence required in the complex mix of medicine and politics C***d became.

In yet another credibility-damaging admission, in June the CDC changed the statistics of fatalities from C****-**. The embattled agency revealed it had over-calculated the C***d ** death count by more than 72,000.

As reported in the Daily Wire, the revision was made to 26 states, across all age groups. The CDC chalked up claims of 72, 277 extra C***D fatalities to a “coding logic error.”

The CDC now claims 969,000 died from C****-**. The adjustments represent about a 7.5 percent decrease in the currently reported fatalities.

It is unclear if the current accepted death count will be subject to even more revisions.

The article notes the CDC altered the C***d death counts months ago. The Daily Wire’s Mairead Elordi stated “that back in August, the data on C***D deaths was changed after they identified a data discrepancy.”
For some reason, it is only being reported now.

It was even more impactful on the reporting on kids. “The huge change in the pediatric death count drops the estimate of C***D deaths in children down to 1,341 nationwide. Children were about 19 percent of all C***D cases but only about a quarter of a percent of those cases were fatal,” said Elordi.

It’s peculiar how the CDC’s mishaps always add intensity to the threat levels from C***D, rather than diminish them.

This wasn’t the only recent revision. In March, the CDC admitted erroneous figures were used to boost the fear factor regarding pediatric C***D deaths. After the late adjustment in March , the claimed fatalities for C***D patients under the age of 18 fell a stunning 24 percent.

The explanation for the misleading data? Also a “coding logic error.”

After finding that massive mistake, a proactive and responsible agency would review all its reporting immediately. Yet months later, significant retractions are still trickling out.

The March pediatric correction came only after the wise Latina Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor took the CDC’s exaggerations and ran with them. Sotomayor added her own disinformation to the C***d narrative during a January hearing, when she falsely claimed 100,000 children were hospitalized with C***d, many on ventilators.

Even the CDC’s recommendations on v*****es are subject to sudden shifts. In February, they upped the gap between C***d v*****es doses to eight weeks to cut down on cases of the potentially lethal side effect of myocarditis.

A proactive and responsible agency would take much stronger action than that toward an experimental v*****e.
Also in February, the CDC was blasted for its lack of t***sparency. Experts questioned why the CDC had shared so little of the information it collected. The CDC claimed providing information would only feed disinformation. Critics noted the opposite was true, and wondered what the CDC was trying to hide.

Many have suspected the CDC was inflating the C***d numbers. The CDC’s own admissions prove the skeptics were right.

If the CDC confesses they were off by tens of thousands, it is reasonable to believe the miscounts are even worse than they admit.

By using the coding logic error excuse, the CDC hoped to hide behind bureaucratic blundering. It’s an easy explanation for the way they manipulated the public.

The CDC’s mission these days seems to be the control and prevention of the release of information regarding the CDC’s missteps and malpractice.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting thing landed in my inbox today. It see... (show quote)


Who is the head of that agency? Some low paid rookie?

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.